This article addresses an impasse in debates about online education in university education. One side presents a story of the progressive development of technology as it is applied to the organisation of higher education, leading to pedagogical advances and to the new forms of administration required for the realisation of the technology's full potentials, both pedagogical and economic. The other side views online education as a lever of neoliberal reform that extends to the university a capitalism that is now digital, global, and knowledge-based. Both sides of the debate share the same underlying philosophy of technology, according to which technology is a fait accompli with which the university must comply or which it must reject out of hand in defence of traditional academic values and priorities. The authors argue that critical theory of technology offers a way to redress this impasse by providing a philosophical orientation capable of widening the debate over online education and university restructuring through its emphasis on the dynamics of technological design and development as social and political processes. They examine the case of an early experiment in educational computer conferencing, drawing significant conclusions from it about methodology and policy in the online education debate.
References
1.
American Association of University Professors (AAUP) (1999) Statement on Distance Education, Special Committee on Distance Education and Intellectual Property Issues. Available at: http://www.aaup.org/statements/Redbook/StDistEd.htm
2.
American Association of University Professors (AAUP) (2004) Academic Freedom and Electronic Communications. Report of Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure. Available at: http://www.aaup.org/statements/REPORTS/04AFelec.htm
3.
AronowitzS. (2000) The Knowledge Factory: Dismantling the corporate university and creating true higher learning. Boston: Beacon.
4.
BatesA.W. (2000) Managing Technological Change: Strategies for university leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BatesA.W. (2004) Why Universities Must Change: The challenge of e-learning. Presented February 2004 at The Learning and Instructional Development Centre, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
6.
BlakeN.StandishP. (2000) Enquiries at the Interface: Philosophical problems of online education. Oxford: Blackwell.
7.
BruneauW.SavageD.C. (2002) Counting out the Scholars: The case against performance indicators in higher education. Toronto: James Lorimer & Canadian Association of University Teachers.
8.
CallonM.LatourB. (1981) Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How actors macro- structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so, in Knorr-CetinaK.CicourelA.V. (Eds) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies, pp. 277–303. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
9.
Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) (2004a) Policy Statement on Academic Freedom, Academic Freedom and Tenure Committee. Available at: http://www.caut.ca/en/policies/academicfreedom.asp
CollinsD.J. (2002) New Business Models for Higher Education, in BrintS. (Ed.) The Future of the City of Intellect: The changing American university, pp. 181–202. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12.
CornfordJ.PollockN. (2003) Putting the University Online: Information technology and organisational change. Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
13.
DelantyG. (2001) Challenging Knowledge: The university in the knowledge society. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
14.
DistefanoA.RudestamK.E.SilvermanR.J. (Eds) (2004) Encyclopaedia of Distributed Learning. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
15.
DruckerP. (1997) Interview, Forbes, March.
16.
DuderstadtJ.J. (1999) Can Colleges and Universities Survive in the Information Age? in Katz & Associates (Eds) Dancing with the Devil: Information technology and the new competition in higher education, pp. 1–25. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Educause & Pricewaterhouse Coopers.
17.
FeenbergA. (1989) The Written World: On the theory and practice of computer conferencing, in MasonR.KayeA. (Eds) Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education, pp. 22–39. Oxford: Pergamon.
18.
FeenbergA. (1991) Critical Theory of Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
FeenbergA. (1993) Building a Global Network: The WBSI experience, in HarasimL. (Ed.) Global Networks: Computers and international communication, pp. 185–197. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
FeenbergA. (1995) Alternative Modernity: The technical turn in philosophy and social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
FeenbergA. (2002) Transforming Technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
GalanN.V. (2001) Throwing down the Gauntlet: The rise of the for-profit education industry, in LewisB.SmithR.MasseyC. (Eds) The Tower under Siege: Technology, power, and education, pp. 11–28. Montreal/Kingston: McGill/Queen's University Press.
25.
GottschalkE.C. (1983) California Institute Uses ‘Teleconferences’ to Teach Business Strategy, Computer Use, Wall Street Journal, 10 February.
26.
GunawardenaC.N.McIsaacM.S. (2004) Distance Education, in JonassonD. (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd edn, pp. 355–395. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
HiltzS.R. (1982) Comment CC14: February 21, 1982, in KerrE. (Ed.) Computers in Education. Unpublished computer conference transcript. New Jersey Institute of Technology: Electronic Information Exchange System (EIES), C303.
28.
HiltzS.R. (1994) The Virtual Classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks. Norwood: Ablex.
29.
InglisA.LingP.JoostenV. (2002) Delivering Digitally: Managing the transition to the knowledge media, 2nd edn.London: Kogan Page.
30.
KatzR.OblingerD. (2000) The ‘e’ is for Everything: E-commerce, e-business and e- learning in the future of higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Educause & Pricewaterhouse Coopers.
31.
KayeT. (1987) Computer Conferencing for Distance Education. Paper presented at Nuove Tecnologia e Vita Quotidiana in Europa, 12–14 November, Bologna.
32.
KerrC. (2001) The Uses of the University, 5th edn.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
KerrE.B. (1984) Moderating Online Conferences. Computerised Conferencing and Communications Centre, Research Report 20. Newark: New Jersey Institute of Technology.
34.
KerrE.B.HiltzS.R. (1982) Computer-mediated Communication Systems: Status and evaluation. New York: Academic Press.
LatourB. (1991) Technology is Society Made Durable, in LawJ. (Ed.) A Sociology of Monsters, pp. 103–131. London: Routledge.
37.
LatourB. (1995) Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The sociology of a door closer, in StarS. L. (Ed.) Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and practices in science and technology, pp. 257–277. Albany: SUNY Press.
38.
LatourB. (1999) On Recalling ANT, in LawJ.HassardJ. (Eds) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
39.
LevidowL. (2002) Marketising Higher Education: Neoliberal strategies and counter- strategies. Available at: http://www.thecommoner.org.uk
40.
LewisB.SmithR.MasseyC. (2001) The Tower under Siege: Technology, power, and education. Montreal/Kingston: McGill/Queen's University Press.
41.
LotheringtonH. (2001) Going Virtual: Lessons learned during a strike at York University. Paper presented at the Eighth International Literacy and Educational Research Network Conference, Spetses, Greece. Available at: http://www.yorku.ca/irlt/reports/Learning.htm
42.
LyotardJ.-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
MeeksB. (1987) The Quiet Revolution: Online education becomes a real alternative, Byte, February, pp. 183–190.
45.
MollM., (Ed.) (1997) Tech High: Globalisation and the future of Canadian education. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives & Fernwood Publishing.
46.
MollM., (Ed.) (2001) But it's Only a Tool! The Politics of Technology and Education Reform. Proceedings, Educational Research Association, Montreal, 1999. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
47.
NaiduS., (Ed.) (2003) Learning and Teaching with Technology: Principles and practices. London: Kogan Page.
48.
New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) (1986) EIES Quick Reference Card. Unpublished computer conference transcript.
NobleD. (2002) Digital Diploma Mills: The automation of higher education. Toronto: Between the Lines Press.
53.
PinchT.BijkerW. (1989) The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other, in BijkerW.E.HughesT.P.PinchT. (Eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology, pp. 17–50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54.
Plato (1973) Phaedrus and Letters VII and VIII. HamiltonW. (Trans.). London: Penguin.
55.
ReedM.DeemR. (2002) New Managerialism: The manager-academic and technologies of management in universities – looking forward to virtuality?, in RobinsK.WebsterF. (Eds) The Virtual University? Knowledge, Markets and Management, pp. 126–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
RobinsK.WebsterF. (1999) Times of the Technoculture: From the information society to the virtual life. London: Routledge.
57.
RobinsK.WebsterF. (2002) The Virtual University? Knowledge, Markets and Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SchillerD. (1999) Digital Capitalism: Networking the global market system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60.
SmithN. (2002) Teaching as Coaching: Helping students to learn in a technological world. Educause Review, 37, May/June, pp. 38–47.
61.
SmithS.E. (1958) Educational Structure: The English-speaking Canadian universities, in BissellC. T. (Ed.) Canada's Crisis in Higher Education. Proceedings, National Conference of Canadian Universities, Ottawa, 12–14 November 1957, pp. 8–22. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
62.
SteeplesC.JonesC. (Eds) (2002) Networked Learning: Perspectives and issues. London: Springer.
63.
WallhausR.A. (2000) E-learning: From institutions to providers, from students to learners, in KatzR.OblingerD. (Eds) The ‘e’ is for Everything: E-commerce, e-business and e-learning in the future of higher education, pp. 21–52. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Educause & Pricewaterhouse Coopers.
64.
Western Behavioral Sciences Institute (WBSI) (1986) Proposal for the Creation of a Computer-mediated Social Systems Research and Development Programme at the Western Behavioral Sciences Institute Jointly with the Digital Equipment Corporation. Proposal submitted May. LaJolla: WBSI.
65.
Western Behavioral Sciences Institute (WBSI) (1987) Social Factors in Computer Mediated Communications. Report prepared for Digital Equipment Corporation, 30 March.
66.
WinnerL. (1977) Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67.
WinnerL. (1986) The Whale and the Reactor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
