This article aims to show the segregating effect of the market-like matching of students and schools at the basic school level. The natural experiment case is Tallinn, the capital of Estonia. The current school choice mechanism applied in this case is based on entrance tests. There are increasingly over-subscribed intra-catchment area public schools, where high reputations are reinforced by publicly reported league tables. The current mechanism has resulted in parental strategies of prep-schooling and the manipulation of addresses. Logistic regression results based on survey data assure that, under competitive entrance, families' educational strategies and background characteristics determine the success of admission to schools with good reputations. Understanding this heterogeneous strategic behaviour is important for the effective design of school choice mechanisms.
References
1.
AdnettN. & DaviesD. (2002) Education as a Positional Good: Implications for market-based reforms of state schooling, British Journal of Educational Studies, 5(2), 189–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.00197
2.
AmmermuellerA. & PischkeJ.S. (2009) Peer Effects in European Primary Schools: Evidence from PIRLS, Journal of Labour Economics, 27, 315–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/603650
3.
Basic Schools and Upper Secondary Schools Act (Põhikooli- ja Gümnaasiumiseadus) (2010) Riigi Teataja RT I 2010, 41, 24, 63, 892. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/13337919 (accessed June 10, 2012).
4.
BettsJ. & LovelessT. (Eds) (2005) Getting Choice Right: Ensuring equity and efficiency in education policy. Washington, DC: Brookling Institution Press.
5.
BettsJ. & RoemerJ.E. (2007) Equalizing Opportunity for Racial and Socioeconomic Groups in the United States through Educational-finance Reform, in WoessmannL. & PetersonP.E. (Eds) Schools and the Equal Opportunity Problem, pp. 209–237. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6.
BifulcoR.LaddH.F. & RossS.L. (2009) The Effects of Public School Choice on Those Left Behind: Evidence from Durham, North Carolina, Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 130–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01619560902810104
7.
BreenR. & GoldthorpeJ. (1997) Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a formal rational action theory, Rationality and Society, 9(3), 275–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104346397009003002
8.
BourdieuP. (1984) Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
9.
BourdieuP. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
BourdieuP. & PasseronJ.C. (1977) Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.
11.
BurgessS. & BriggsA. (2006) School Assignment, School Choice and Social Mobility. CMPO Working Paper, 06(157), Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol.
12.
BurgessS.GreavesE.VignolesA. & WilsonD. (2009) What Parents Want: School preferences and school choice. CMPO Working Paper, 09(222), Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol.
13.
BurgessS.GreavesE.VignolesA. & WilsonD. (2011) Parental Choice of Primary School in England: What types of school do different types of family really have available to them?, Policy Studies, 32(5), 531–547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2011.601215
14.
ChauvelL. (2006) Les Classes moyennes à la dérive [The middle classes adrift]. Paris: Seuil.
15.
ChowdryH.GreavesE. & SibietaL. (2010) The Pupil Premium: Assessing the options. London: Institute of Fiscal Studies.
CrozierG.ReayD.JamesD. (2008) White Middle-class Parents, Identities, Educational Choice and the Urban Comprehensive School: Dilemmas, ambivalence and moral ambiguity, British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 29(3), 261–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01425690801966295
18.
CunhaF. & HeckmanJ. (2007) Identifying and Estimating the Distributions of Ex Post and Ex Ante Returns to Schooling, Labour Economics, 14, 870–893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2007.06.002
19.
CurrieJ. (2000) School Quality and the Long-term Effects of Head Start, Journal of Human Resources, 35(4), 755–775. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/146372
20.
CurrieJ. (2001) Early Childhood Education Programs, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 213–38.
21.
De GraafN.De GraafP. & KraaykampG. (2000) Parental Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment in the Netherlands: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective, Sociology of Education, 73(2), 92–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2673239
22.
DemingD. (2009) Early Childhood Intervention and Life-cycle Skill Development: Evidence from the Head Start, American Economic Journal, 1(3), 111–134.
23.
Estonian Ministry of Education and research (EMER) (2007) Development Plan for Primary and Secondary Education 2007–2013. http://www.hm.ee/index.php?03236 (accessed July 10, 2013).
24.
Eurydice (2012) Key Data on Education in Europe 2012. Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). DOI: 10.2797–77414
25.
FriedmanM. (1955) The Role of Government in Education, in SoloR.A. (Ed.) Economics and Public Interest, pp. 123–144New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
26.
FriedmanM. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
GoldthorpeJ. (2007) ‘Cultural Capital’: Some critical observations, Sociologica2, 1–23.
29.
GorardS.TaylorC. & FitzJ. (2003) School Markets and Choice Policies. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
30.
HanushekE. A., & WoessmannL. (2010) The Economics of International Differences in Educational Achievement. NBER Working Paper 15949–04. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
31.
HarmonC.OosterbeekH. & WalkerI. (2003) The Returns to Education: Microeconomics, Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(2), 115–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00191
32.
HirschD. (2002) What Works in Innovation in Education. School: A choice of directions. CERI Working Paper, OECD.
33.
HolmeJ.J. (2002) Buying Home, Buying Schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality, Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 177–205.
34.
JaegerM. & HolmA. (2007) Does Parents' Economic, Cultural, and Social Capital Explain the Social Class Effect on Educational Attainment in the Scandinavian Mobility Regime?, Social Science Research, 36, 719–744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.11.003
35.
KarolyL.A.GreenwoodP.W.EveringhamS.S. (1998) Investing in Our Children: What we know and don't know about the costs and benefits of early childhood interventions. Santa Monica: Rand.
36.
KoopK. (2006) Lapse üleminek lasteaiast kooli — lapsevanema nägemus. Kasvatusteadused, Tallinna Ülikool.
37.
KukkA. & TaltsL. (2009) Does the Location of School Affect the Learning Results of the Children Who are about to Embark on Their School Path? On the Example of Tallinn Kindergartens and Schools, in HytönenJuhani (Ed.) Educational Environment is Early Childhood Education in Estonia and Finland, IV, pp. 109–121. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/15094
38.
Le GrandJ. (2007) The Other Invisible Hand: Delivering public services through choice and competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
LundS. (2008) Choice Paths in the Swedish Upper Secondary Education — a critical discourse analysis of recent reforms, Journal of Education Policy, 23(6), 633–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680930802209743
40.
MartensK. (2007) How to Become an Influential Actor — the ‘comparative turn’ in OECD education policy, in MartensK.RusconiA. & LeuzeK. (Eds) New Arenas of Education Governance. Palgrave McMillian.
41.
MironG.EvergreenS. & UrschelJ. (2008) The Impact of School Choice Reforms on Student Achievement. EPRU Research Paper, Arizona State University and University of Colorado at Boulder.
42.
MussetP. (2012) School Choice and Equity: Current policies in OECD countries and a literature review. OECD Education Working Papers, 66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9fq23507vc-en
43.
NewmanJ. & ClarkeJ. (2009) Publics, Politics and Power: Changing the publics in public services. London: Sage.
44.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2010) PISA 2009 Results: What makes a school successful? — resources, policies and practices (Vol. IV). Paris: OECD. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091559-en
45.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2011) Education at a Glance 2011: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2011-en
46.
PoikolainenJ. (2012) A Case Study of Parents' School Choice Strategies in a Finnish Urban Context, European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 127–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.1.127
47.
PõderK. (2012) What Makes Some Schools Better than Others? Estonian Case, Business Review, Cambridge, 19(2), 216–223.
48.
PõderK.KeremK. & LauriT. (2013) Efficiency and Equity within European Education Systems and School Choice Policy: Bridging qualitative and quantitative approaches, Journal of School Choice, 7(1), 1–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2013.759837
49.
ReynoldsA.J. (1998) Extended Early Childhood Intervention and School Achievement: Age thirteen findings from the Chicago longitudinal study, Child Development, 69(1), 231–246.
50.
RiedelA.ScheneiderK.SchuchartC. & WeishauptH. (2009) School Choice in German Primary Schools: How binding are school districts? Schumpeter Discussion Papers 011, 1–35. Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Germany.
SeppänenP. (2003) Patterns of ‘Public-school Markets’ in the Finnish Comprehensive School from a Comparative Perspective, Journal of Education Policy, 18(5), 513–531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0268093032000124875
WoessmannL. (2003) Schooling Resources, Educational Institutions, and Student Performance: The International evidence, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(2), 117–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.00045
58.
WoessmannL. (2008a) Efficiency and Equity of European Education and Training Policies, International Tax and Public Finance, 15(2), 199–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9064-1
59.
WoessmannL. (2008b) How Equal are Educational Opportunities? Family Background and Student Achievement in Europe and the United States, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 78(1), 45–70.
60.
WoessmannL.LuedemannE.SchuetzG. & WestM.R. (2009) School Accountability, Autonomy, and Choice Around the World. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
