This article is based on research in an ongoing ethnographic investigation of schooling in a multiethnic, multiracial school on the outskirts of a major Swedish conurbation in an area of multidimensional poverty. First, it analyses the use of an individuating, visible pedagogy, which contains a large number of routines that are designed and intended to improve the performances and behaviour of pupils in the school. Secondly, it analyses the subjective responses of the pupils to this pedagogy. Hidden forms of resistance to the main intentions of the pedagogy are presented and discussed.
AnyonJ. (1983) Intersections of Gender and Class: Accommodation and resistance by working-class and affluent females to contradictory sex-role ideologies, in WalkerI.S. & BartonL. (Eds) Gender, Class and Education. Basingstoke: Falmer Press.
3.
ArnesenAnne-Lise & LundahlLisbeth (2006) Still Social and Democratic? Inclusive Education Policies in the Nordic Welfare States, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 285–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743316
4.
BallS.J. (2006) Education Policy and Social Class: Selected works. London: Routledge.
BeachD. & DovemarkM. (2011) Twelve Years of Upper-secondary Education in Sweden: The beginnings of a neo-liberal policy hegemony?, Educational Review, 63(3), 313–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.560249
7.
BeachD. & SernhedeO. (2011) From Learning to Labour to Learning for Marginality: School segregation and marginalisation in Swedish suburbs, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32, 257–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.547310
8.
BernsteinB. (1990) Class, Codes and Control. Vol. 4: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.
9.
BouakazL. (2007) Parental Involvement in School: What promotes and what hinders parental involvement in an urban school. University dissertation, Malmö Högskola.
10.
BunarN. (2010) Choosing for Quality or Inequality: Current perspectives on the implementation of school choice policy in Sweden, Journal of Education Policy, 25(1), 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680930903377415
11.
DovemarkM. (2004) Pupil Responsibility in the Context of School Changes in Sweden: Market constraints on state policies for a creative education, European Educational Researcher Journal, 3(3), 658–673. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2004.3.3.8
12.
FurlongV.J. (1985) The Deviant Pupil: Sociological perspectives. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
13.
GordonT. & HollandJ. (2003) The Construction of Citizenship and Difference in Schools, in BeachD.GordonT. & LahelmaE. (Eds) Democratic Education: Ethnographic challenges, 24–39. London: Tufnell Press.
14.
HögbergR. (2009) Motstånd och konformitet: Om manliga yrkeselevers liv och identitetsskapande i relation till kärnämnena (Linköping Studies in Behavioural Science no. 146 and Linköping Studies in Pedagogic Practices no. 11). Linköping: Linköping University.
15.
HögbergRonny (2011) Cheating as Subversive and Strategic Resistance: Vocational students' resistance and conformity towards academic subjects in a Swedish upper secondary school, Ethnography and Education, 6(3), 341–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2011.610584
16.
HolmA.-S. (2008) Relationer i skolan. En studie av femininiteter och maskuliniteter i år 9 [Relations in school. A study of femininities and masculinities in the 9th grade]. Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 260. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
17.
LarssonS. (2006) Ethnography in Action: How ethnography was established in Swedish research, Ethnography and Education, 1(2), 177–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17457820600715406
MacAnGhaill M. (1988) Young Gifted and Black. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
20.
MunnsG. & McFaddenM. (2000) First Chance, Second Chance or Last Chance? Resistance and Response to Education, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(1), 59–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01425690095162
21.
ÖhrnE. (2005) Att göra skillnad. En studie av ungdomar som politiska aktörer i skolans vardag [to make a difference. A study of young people as political actors in school]. Report no 2005:07, University of Gothenburg, Department of Education.
22.
ÖhrnE. (2009) Challenging Sexism? Gender and Ethnicity in the Secondary School, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(6), 579–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313830903302091
23.
ÖhrnE. (2012) Urban Education and Segregation: The responses from young people, European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 45–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.1.45
SchwartzA. (2010) Att ‘nollställa bakgrunder’ för en effektiv skola, Utbildning & Demokrati, 19(1), 45–62. Tidskrift för didaktik och utbildningspolitik. Stockholm.
26.
SchwartzA. & ÖhrnE. (2012) Fellowship and Solidarity? Secondary Students' Responses to Strong Classification and Framing in Education, in PinkW. (Ed.) Schools and Marginalized Youth: An international perspective. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
27.
TrondmanM. (2008) Bypass Surgery: Re-routing theory to ethnographic study, in WalfordG. (Ed.) How to Do Ethnography, pp. 115–140. London: Tufnell Press.
28.
WacquantL. (2007) Territorial Stigmatization in the Age of Advanced Marginality, Thesis Eleven, 91(1), 66–77.
29.
WacquantL. (2009) Punishing the Poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30.
WillisP. (1977) Learning to Labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Nafferton: Saxon House.
31.
WoodsP.W. (1979) The Divided School. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
32.
YoudellD. (2012) Fabricating ‘Pacific Islander’: Pedagogies of expropriation, return and resistance and other lessons from a ‘Multicultural Day’, Race, Ethnicity and Education, 15(2), 141–155.
33.
ZembylasM. (2010) Pedagogic Struggles to Enhance Inclusion and Reconciliation in a Divided Community, Ethnography and Education, 5(3), 277–292.
