AndreassonI. (forthcoming) Representations of Pupils with Special Needs in Individual Educational Plans. Doctoral dissertation, Göteborg University.
2.
Bank-MikkelsenN.-E. (1964) The Ideological and Legal Basis of the National Service for the Mentally Retarded, in ÖsterJ. & SletvedH. (Eds). International Copenhagen Congress on the Scientific Study of Mental Retardation. Vol. 1. Copenghagen: Det Berlingske Bogtrykkeri.
BrantlingerE. (1997) Using Ideology: Cases of nonrecognition of the politics of research and practice in special education, Review of Educational Research, 67, pp. 425–459. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1170517
5.
CooperP. (1996) Are Individual Education Plans a Waste of Paper?British Journal of Special Education, 23(3), pp. 115–119.
6.
FoucaultM. (1974/1993) Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
7.
FuchsD. & FuchsL.S. (1997) Editorial: Lessons from a welfare ‘reform’, Journal of Special Education, 30(3), pp. 229–231.
8.
ImsenG. (2003) Democratic Evaluation and Evaluation for Learning: A reply to Ove Karlsson, in HaugI.P. & SchwandtT.A. (Ed.). Evaluating Educational Reforms: Scandinavian perspectives. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
9.
KarlssonO. (2003) Democratic Evaluation: An arena for dialogue and learning, in HaugI.P. & SchwandtT.A. (EdS) Evaluating Educational Reforms: Scandinavian perspectives. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
10.
NirjeB. (1992) The Normalization Principle Papers. Uppsala: Centre for Handicap Research, Uppsala University.
11.
OsvoldT.M. (2005) Inkludering — Integrering ute av system. Statped 4/05, p. 23.
12.
Swedish Agency for Education (2003) Kartläggning av åtgärdsprogram och särskilt stöd i grundskolan. Stockholm: Skolverket.
13.
UNESCO (2000) Schools for All: Open file on inclusive education. Paris: UNESCO.