After describing both average scores, dispersion, and social inequalities in achievement in the various countries included in the latest Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) study, this article relates those ‘products' to country economic and cultural characteristics. It then explores relations between student scores and a number of institutional characteristics of countries' educational systems. Results show that relations exist between average scores and certain institutional or pedagogical practices such as grade repeating or tracking. A high degree of social inequality in achievement proves to be associated with overall score dispersion and degree to which educational system differentiates among students.
References
1.
BroadfootP. (1996) Education, Assessment and Society (Buckingham, Open University Press).
2.
CrahayM. & DelhaxeA. (2003) L'enseignement secondaire inférieur: Entre culture de l'intégration et culture de la différenciation, Rapport pour le PIREF-Ministère de la recherché (French Ministry of Research).
3.
DemeuseM.CrahayM. & MonseurC. (2001), Efficiency and Equity, in HutmacherW.CochraneD. & BottaniN. Eds) In Pursuit of Equity in Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4.
Duru-BellatM. (2002) Les Inégalités sociales à l'école: Genèse et myths. Paris: PUF.
5.
Duru-BellatM. (2004) Social Inequality at School and Educational Policies (Fundamentals of Educational Planning, no. 78). Paris: UNESCO.
6.
Duru-BellatM.MonsN. & SuchautB. (2004) Caractéristiques des systèmes éducatifs et compétences des jeunes de 15 ans: L'éclairage des comparaisons entre pays. Cahier de l'Iredu, no. 66. Dijon: IREDU.
7.
GreenA.PrestonJ. & SabatesR. (2003) Education, Equality and Social Cohesion: A distributional approach, Working paper, Wider Benefits of Learning Centre, London.
8.
HanusheckE.A. (1997) Assessing the Effects of School Resources on Student Performance: An update, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), pp. 141–164.
9.
HeynemanS. & LoxleyW. (1983) The Effects of Primary School Quality on Academic Achievement across Twenty-nine High and Low Income Countries, American Journal of Sociology, 88, pp. 1162–1194.
10.
LassibilleG. & Navarro-GomezL. (2000) Organisation and Efficiency of Educational Systems: Some empirical findings, Comparative Education, 36(1), pp. 7–19.
11.
MeuretD. (2003) Pourquoi les jeunes de 15 ans ont-ils à 15 ans des compétences inférieures à celles de jeunes d'autres pays?Revue Française de Pédagogie, 142, pp. 89–104.
12.
MingatA. & SuchautB. (2000) Les systèmes éducatifs africains: Une analyse économique comparative. Brussels: De Boeck.
13.
MonsN. (2004) Politiques de décentralisation en éducation: Diversité internationale, légitimation théorique et justifications empiriques, Revue Française de Pédagogie, 146, pp. 41–52.
14.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2001) Knowledge and Skills for Life. First Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
15.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2003) Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow. Further Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
16.
OpdenakkerM-C. & Van DammeJ. (2001) Relationship between School Composition and Characteristics of School Process and their Effects on Mathematics Achievement, British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), pp. 407–432.
17.
VandenbergheV. (2001) Efficacité-équité dans l'enseignement secondaire: Quelle relation?Reflets et Perspectives de la vie économiques, XL(4) (reproduced in Problèmes économiques, 2.753, 20 mars 2002, pp. 12–16).
18.
WillmsJ.D. & SomersM-A. (2001) Family, Classroom and School Effects on Children's Education outcomes in Latin America, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(4), pp. 409–445.
19.
ZacharyM-D. (2001) Structures scolaires et équité des systèmes d'enseignement en Europe, Wallonie, 66, pp. 93–102.
