The present learning discourse and terms such as ‘learning in practice’, ‘situated learning’, ‘project and problem based learning’ are like variations on a recurrent theme: learning by doing — the striking maxims of progressivism. The newest reforms confirm that the maxim is still alive as a standpoint with consequences for institutional and educational development. The article follows the tracks by analysing significant variations, project work and practice learning, firstly by analysing the practical variations seen from an organisational perspective, and secondly, by analysing a case of business-practice oriented project work seen from the learner's perspective. The analysis shows how the teachers and learners in practice are doing learning. The analyses also show how the learners in action and in words provide the practical confirmation: one learns by doing.
References
1.
ArgyrisC. (1992) On Organizational Learning. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
2.
BatesonG. (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.
3.
BorgnakkeK. (1983) Projektpædagogikken gennem teori og praksis [The project pedagogy through theory and practice], Aalborg University.
4.
BorgnakkeK. (1985) Pædagogisk feltforskning — Del-rapport I og II. Om Sproglig-pædagogisk basisuddannelse, Jysk Abent Universitet 1982–84 [Report of educational fieldwork at the Basic Studies Programme, the Open University of Jutland 1982–84], Aalborg University.
5.
BorgnakkeK. (1995) Projektpædagogikken og de ‘nye’ projektopgaver — En diskussion og analyse af aktuelle udfordringer [Projectpedagogy and ‘new’ project assignments — analysis of current challenges], in SchnackK. (Ed.) Læseplansstudier 3. Copenhagen: The Royal School of Educational Studies.
6.
BorgnakkeK. (1996a) Gender, Educational Theory and Educational Research, in OlesenSalling H. & RasmussenP. (Eds) Theoretical Issues in Adult Education. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.
7.
BorgnakkeK. (1996b) Pædagogisk Feltforskning og Procesanalytisk metodologi [Educational field research and the methodology of process analysis]. Danish University Press.
8.
BorgnakkeK. (1999) Group Work and Learning Processes — viewed practically and analytically, in OlesenSalling & JensenHøjgaard (Eds) Project Studies — a late modern university reform?Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.
9.
BorgnakkeK. (2002) Skærpelse af kritisk teori og analytisk sans for praksis [Sharpening critical theory and analytic sense of practice], Nordisk Pedagogik, 22, pp. 195–214.
10.
BorgnakkeK. & RaaeP.H. (2004) Professionaliseringsgevinsten — lærerprofessionalisering gennem forsøg og udviklingsarbejde, in HjortK. (Ed.) De Professionelle — forskning i professioner og professionsuddannelse. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.
11.
ChaiklinF. & LaveJ. (1993) Understanding Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
DeweyJ. ([1910] 1991) How We Think. New York: Prometheus Books.
13.
DeweyJ. (1956) The School and Society. New York: Phoenix Books.
14.
DeweyJ. (1961) Democracy and Education. London: Macmillan.
15.
EngeströmY. (1986) The Zone of Proximal Development as the Basic Category of Educational Psychology, Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 8(1).
16.
HabermasJ. (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, vols 1 & 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
17.
HabermasJ. (1998) On the Pragmatics of Communication, ed. CookeM.. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
18.
LaveJ. (1997) Learning, Apprenticeship, Social Practice, Special Issue: Apprenticeship — Learning as Social Practice. Nordisk Pedagogik, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
