BoskerR.LamJ.F.LuytenH.SteenR.en de VosH. (1998). Het vergelijken van scholen. Uitgeverij Universiteit Twente.
2.
Darling-HammondL., & AscherC. (1991). Creating accountability in big city schools. New York: Columbia University, ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education, and National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools and Teaching.
3.
DfES (2001). Autumn Package. London, DfES.
4.
EminJ. (1995). La mise en place d'un dispositif d'indicateurs pour le pilotage des établissements secondaires français. Direction de l'évaluation et de la prospective (DEP), Paris.
5.
Fitz-Gibbon (1997). The Value Added National Project: Final Report. London: SCAA.
6.
GoldsteinH. (1993). Assessing group differences. Oxford Review of Education, 19, 141–150.
7.
MEN, (Ministère de l'education nationale, de la recherche et de la technologie) (1999). L'edition 1999des indicateurs de performance des lycées. Communiqué de presse du 31 fev. 1999. Paris.
8.
MEN, (Ministère de l'education nationale, de la recherche et de la technologie) (2000). Les indicateurs des lycées. Communiqué de presse du 3 mars 2000. Paris.
9.
OECD, (2001). Knowlegde and skills for life. First results from PISA 2000.
10.
SOEID, (1997). How good is our school? Taking a closer look at specialist services.
11.
SOEID, (1998). Taking a closer look at attainment in secondary schools in Raising standards — setting targets, Secondary Schools Support Pack, Edinburgh, HMSO.
12.
The Scottish Office, (1997). Raising Standards, Setting targets: Secondary Schools Support Pack. Edinburgh.
ThomasS. (1998). Value-added Measures of school effectiveness in the United Kingdom. Prospects, 28, (1), p. 91–108.
15.
ThomasS.SammonsP. & StreetH. (1997). Value added approaches: Fairer ways of comparing schools. SIN Research Matters, nr. 7, London, Institute of education, University of London.
16.
YangM.GolsteinH.RathT en HillN. (1999). The use of assessment data for improvement purposes. Oxford Review of education, in press.