The authors describe an economics-based game they have developed to instruct student teachers in the value of games and gaming for developing reasoning and decision-making skills in economics in K-12 students (5–18-year-olds). The game is designed to progress through each grade level so that by high school students have a thorough appreciation and understanding of how the world economy is interconnected. Gaming is a feature that both authors are using as part of their curriculum within their social studies methods courses. In particular, the authors are encouraging the use of more sophisticated modes of instruction for elementary teachers in order to redeem the value of the social studies within the elementary curriculum.
BussJ. (2005) The ‘Monster Bank’ Game – or Buss's B.U.S., OAH Magazine of History, 19(3), 40–43.
4.
DunnP.DavidsonT. (2010) One Fish, Two Fish: Balancing economy with ecology as a fishery manager, Science Activities, 46(4), 31–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/SATS.46.4.31-34
5.
Federation of American Scientists (2006) Harnessing the Power of Video Games for Learning. http://fas.org/gamesummit/ (accessed April 4, 2012).
6.
GarrisR.AhlersR.DriskellJ. (2002) Games, Motivation, and Learning: A research and practice model, Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607
7.
JohnstonC.G.JamesR.H.LyeJ.N.McDonaldI.M. (2000) An Evaluation of Collaborative Problem Solving for Learning Economics, Journal of Economic Education, 31(Winter), 13–29.
8.
LiebermanD. (2006) What Can We Learn from Playing Interactives Games?, in VordererP.BryantJ.Playing Video Games: Motives, responses, and consequences, pp. 379–397. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
RitterfieldU.WeberR. (2006) Video Games for Entertainment and Education, in VordererP.BryantJ.Playing Video Games: Motives, responses, and consequences, pp. 399–413. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
SpringerL.StanneM.DonovanS. (1999) Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021
