This article documents what happened in a first grade classroom when young Latina/o children of immigrants had consistent classroom-based opportunities to use their agency in their learning. Applying theoretical constructs from development economics to data from the Agency and Young Children ethnographic project, we explore three forms of agency that young children in Ms Bailey's class used so often that it became routine and normal to see on an everyday basis. These forms of agency include (1) initiating projects, (2) designing projects and (3) pursuing inquiry through questions. With each form of agency, we point out the types of capabilities that were possible because of children being able to use that particular form. We then discuss how these forms of agency debunk some of the deficit discourses that are used to justify the current narrowing of curriculum for young children from marginalized communities, specifically Latina/o children of immigrants.
References
1.
AdairJ.K. (2014) School-based Agency as Expanding Capabilities: What it could mean for young children in the early grades, Harvard Educational Review, 84(2).
2.
AdairJ.K. & ColegroveK.S. (2014) Communal Agency and Social Development: Examples from first grade classrooms serving children of immigrants, Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 8(2), 69–91.
3.
AdairJ.K. & TobinJ. (2007) Listening to the Voices of Parents, in GenishiC. & GoodwinA. (Eds) Diversities in Early Childhood Education: Rethinking and doing, pp. 137–150. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
4.
AldersonP. (2008) Young Children's Rights. London: Jessica Kingsley.
5.
ArzubiagaA.E.NoguerónS.C. & SullivanA.L. (2009) The Education of Children of Im/migrants Families, Review of Research of Education, 33, 246–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0091732X08328243
6.
BousheyG. & MoserJ. (2006) The Daily Five: Fostering literacy independence in the elementary grades. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
7.
BrownC.P. (2009) Pivoting a Pre-kindergarten Program off the Child or the Standard? A Case Study of Integrating the Practices of Early Childhood Education into Elementary School, Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 202–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/605770
8.
CrosnoeR. (2006) Mexican Roots, American Schools: Helping Mexican immigrant children succeed. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
GarciaE. & GonzalesD. (2006) PreK and Latina/os: The foundation for America's future. Washington, DC: PreK Now.
14.
GenishiC. (1988) Children's Language: Learning words from experience, Young Children. 44(1), 16–23.
15.
GenishiC. (Ed.) (1992) Ways of Assessing Children and Curriculum: Stories of early childhood practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
GenishiC. (1997) Assessing against the Grain: A conceptual framework for alternative assessments, in GoodwinA. (Ed.) Assessment for Equity and Inclusion: Embracing all our children, pp. 35–50. New York: Routledge.
17.
GenishiC. (2002) Young English Language Learners: Resourceful in the classroom, Young Children, 57(4), 66–72.
18.
GenishiC. & DysonA.H. (1984) Language Assessment in the Early Years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19.
GenishiC. & DysonA.H. (2009) Children, Language, and Literacy: Diverse learners in diverse times. New York: Teachers College Press and Washington, DC: The National Association for the Education of Young Children.
20.
GoldsteinL.S. (2008) Kindergarten Teachers Making ‘Street-level’ Education Policy in the Wake of No Child Left Behind, Early Education and Development, 19(3), 448–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10409280802065387
GumperzJ.J. (1972) Introduction, in GumperzJ.J. and HymesD. (Eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, pp. 1–25. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
KatzL.G. (1994) The Project Approach, ERIC Digest. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. http://www.ericdigests.org/1994/project.html (accessed February 3, 2012).
25.
LansdownG. (2005) Can You Hear Me? The Right of Young Children to Participate in Decisions Affecting Them, vol. 36. The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.
26.
MacNaughtonG.HughesP. & SmithK. (Eds) (2008) Young Children as Active Citizens: Principles, policies and pedagogies. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
27.
MadridS. & Dunn-KenneyM. (2010) Persecutory Guilt, Surveillance and Resistance: The emotional themes of early childhood educators, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(4), 388–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2010.11.4.388
MitchellL. (2010). Constructions of childhood in early childhood education policy debate in New Zealand. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(4), 328–341. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2010.11.4.328
30.
PhillipsL.G. (2010) Social Justice Storytelling and Young Children's Active Citizenship, Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 31(3), 363–376.
RitchieJ. (2012) Early Childhood Education as a Site of Ecocentric Counter-colonial Endeavour in Aotearoa, New Zealand, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 86–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2012.13.2.86
33.
RyanS. & GrieshaberS. (2005) Shifting from Developmental to Postmodern Practices in Early Childhood Education, Journal of Teacher Education, 5(1), 34–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487104272057
34.
SenA. (1985) Well-being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984, Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2026184
35.
SenA. (1991) Capability and Well-Being, in NussbaumM. & SenA. (Eds) The Quality of Life, pp. 30–53. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
36.
SenA. (1999) Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred Knopf.
37.
SenA. (2003) Development as Capability Expansion, in Fukuda-ParrS., (Eds) Readings in Human Development, pp. 3–16. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
SenA. & AnandS. (1994) Human Development Index: Methodology and measurement, Human Development Report Office Occasional Paper 12 (New York, 1994), reprinted in Fukuda-ParrS. & KumarShiva A.K. (Eds) Readings in Human Development. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
40.
SotoL.D. (1997) Language, Culture, and Power: Bilingual families and the struggle for quality education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
41.
Souto-ManningM. (2009) Educating Latina/o Children: International perspectives and values in early education, Childhood Education, 85(3), 182–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2009.10521388
42.
StiresS. & GenishiC. (2008) Listening to the Voices of Parents, in GenishiC. & GoodwinA. (Eds) Learning English in School: Rethinking curriculum relationships, and time, pp. 49–66. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
43.
TakanishiR. (2004) Leveling the Play Field: Supporting immigrant children from birth to eight, Future of Children, 14(2), 61–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1602794
44.
TobinJ.ArzubiagaA.E. & AdairJ.K. (2013) Children Crossing Borders. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
TobinJ.J.WuD.Y.H. & DavidsonD.H. (1989) Preschool in Three Cultures: Japan, China, and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47.
ValdésG. (2001) Learning and not Learning English: Latina/o students in American schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
48.
ValenzuelaA. (2005) Leaving Children Behind: How Texas-style accountability fails Latina/o youth. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
49.
HeilingVasquez J. (2011) As Good as Advertised? Tracking Urban Student Progress through High School in an Environment of Accountability, American Secondary Education, 39(3), 17–41.
50.
WohlwendK.E. (2009) Early Adopters: Playing new literacies and pretending new technologies in print-centric classrooms, Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(2), 117–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468798409105583
