This article examines two constructs — ritual and intellectual integrity — as they might unfold in early childhood settings. The authors use the popular practices of closed-ended crafts, calendar exercises, and worksheets to highlight the difference between learning experiences that have become formulaic habits and those that reflect rich and potent opportunities for children's thinking, imagining, and reflecting. The authors then analyze the calendar ritual and suggest ways to modify these experiences to indicate intellectual integrity and curricular depth that early childhood educators can offer to children.
References
1.
ArmstrongT. (2006) The Best Schools: How human development research should inform educational practice. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
2.
BenekeS.J.OstroskyM.M. & KatzL.G. (2008) Calendar Time for Young Children: Good intentions gone awry, Young Children, 63(3), 12–16.
3.
BerkL. & WinslerA. (1995) Scaffolding Children's Learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
4.
BlakeS.HurleyS. & ArenzB. (1995) Mathematical Problem Solving and Young Children, Early Childhood Education Journal, 23(2), 81–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02353397
5.
BranscombeN.A.CastleK.DorseyA.G.SurbeckE. & TaylorJ.B. (2003) Early Childhood Curriculum: A constructivist perspective. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6.
BredekampS. & CoppleC. (1997) Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs, 2nd edn.Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
7.
CharlesworthR. & LindK. (2003) Math and Science for Young Children. Clifton Park, NY: Delmar.
8.
ChenfeldM.B. (2006) Handcuff Me Too!Phi Delta Kappan, 87(10), 745–747.
9.
CoppleC. & BredekampS. (2009) Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs, 3rd edn.Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
10.
CrossD.J. & SwimT.J. (2006) A Scholarly Partnership for Examining the Pragmatics of Reggio-Inspired Practice in an Early-Childhood Classroom: Provocations, documentation, and time, Scholarly Partnerships Edu, 1(1), 47–68.
11.
CurtisD. & CarterM. (1996) Reflecting Children's Lives: A handbook for planning child-centered curriculum. St Paul: Redleaf Press.
12.
DahlbergG. & MossP. (2006) Introduction: Our Reggio Emilia, in RinaldiC. (Ed.) In Dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching, and learning, 1–22. New York: Routledge.
13.
DiCamilloK. (2005) Mercy Watson to the Rescue. Cambridge, MA: Candlewick Press.
14.
EdwardsC.GandiniL. & FormanG. (1998) The Hundred Languages of Children: The Reggio Emilia approach — Advanced reflections, 2nd edn.Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
15.
EisnerE. (2000) Cognition and Representation: A way to pursue the American dream? In ParkayF. & HassG. (Eds) Curriculum Planning: A contemporary approach, 7th edn, 248–254. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
EthridgeE.A. & KingJ.R. (2005) Calendar Math in Preschool and Primary Classrooms: Questioning the curriculum, Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(5), 291–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10643-005-4398-0
17.
FosnotC.T. (2005) Constructivism Revisited: Implications and reflections, in FosnotC.T. (Ed.) Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice, 2nd edn, 276–291. New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
HarlanJ. & RivkinM. (2004) Science Experiences for the Early Childhood Years: An integrated affective approach, 8th edn.Upper Saddle River: Merrill.
19.
HelmJ.H.BenekeS. & WorsleyM. (2003) Meeting Standards Effectively, in HelmJ.H. & BenekeS. (Eds) The Power of Projects: Meeting contemporary challenges in early childhood classrooms — Strategies and solutions, 79–96. New York: Teachers College Press & National Association for the Education of Young Children.
20.
HelmJ.H. & KatzL. (2001) Young Investigators: The project approach in the early years. New York: Teachers College Press.
21.
HendrickJ. (2004) Next Steps toward Teaching the Reggio Way: Accepting the challenge to change. Upper Saddle River: Merrill.
22.
HorschP.ChenJ. & NelsonD. (1999) Rules and Rituals: Tools for creating a respectful, caring learning community, Phi Delta Kappan, 81(3), 223–227.
23.
KamiiC. (1982) Principles of Teaching, in KamiiC., Number in Preschool and Kindergarten: Educational implications of Piaget's theory, 27–45. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
LonningR.A.DeFrancoT.C. & WeinlandT.P. (1998) Development of Theme-Based, Interdisciplinary, Integrated Curriculum: A theoretical model, School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 312–319.
National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2002) Early Childhood Mathematics: Promoting good beginnings. Joint Position Statement of NAEYC and NCTM. Washington, DC: NAEYC & NCTM.
28.
RinaldiC. (2006) In Dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching, and learning. New York: Routledge.
29.
SeefeldtC. (2001) Social Studies for the Preschool/Primary Child, 6th edn.Columbus: Merrill.
30.
TateM.L. (2003) Worksheets Don't Grow Dendrites: 20 instructional strategies that engage the brain. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
31.
TorrenceE. (2003) Learning to Think: An American third grader discovers mathematics in Holland, Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(2), 90–93.
32.
TrowbridgeS. (2007) Educational Rituals: Questioning how we educate our children, Phi Delta Kappan, 88(5), 395–398.
WienC.A. (2004) Negotiating Standards in the Primary Classroom: The teacher's dilemma. New York: Teachers College Press.
37.
WienC.A. (2008) Toward a ‘Good-Enough’ Theory of Emergent Curriculum, in WienC.A. (Ed.) Emergent Curriculum in the Primary Classroom: Interpreting the Reggio Emilia approach in schools, 144–161. New York: Teachers College Press & National Association for the Education of Young Children.
38.
WorthK. & GrollmanS. (2003) Worms, Shadows, and Whirlpools: Science in the early childhood classroom. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
