The questions raised in this article have to do with how to take due care of the subjectivity of the persons involved in a research project. My main point is that a researcher's self-reflection on ethical problems is inextricably a part of doing research in early childhood settings, if we want to create knowledge which is valid and takes care of the subjectivity of the persons taking part. Questions concerning ethics and validity thus are intertwined. The article draws from the experiences of being a participant observer and cooperating with preschool teacher-carers in Norwegian preschool day-care centres or nursery schools. The purpose of the article is to draw attention to troubling questions which may arise in all phases of a research project involving practitioners in early childhood settings. The focus is on how reflecting on such questions may challenge the powerful role of the researcher and empower the position of the teacher.
References
1.
BaeB. (1986) Observasjon i barnehagesammenheng — En problematisering [Observation in a preschool context — Some critical problems], in PettersenR.LandeM. & LieJ.B. (Eds) Ny kunnskap på barnehagesektore, del 1 [New knowledge in the field of early childhood education, Part 1], pp. 211–222. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. (Also published in a slightly changed version, as Chapter 2 in Bae [1996a]).
2.
BaeB. (1987a) Aspects of Participant Observation in the Day Care Context. Paper presented at the Symposium for Qualitative Research in Psychology, Perugia.
3.
BaeB. (1987b) Selvutvikling og relasjonserfaringer i barnehage [Self-development and relationship experiences in day-care centres], Nordisk Pedagogikk [Nordic Journal of Educational Research], 3, pp. 140–150.
4.
BaeB. (1988) Relationship Experiences and Self-development in Day Care Centres — A pilot study, in EkbergK. & MjaavatnP.E. (Eds) Growing into a Modern World. Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 246–263. Trondheim: Norsk senter for barneforskning [Norwegian Centre for Child Research].
5.
BaeB. (1992) Relasjon som vågestykke [Relationships as daring deeds], in BaeB. & WaastadJ.E. (Eds) Erkjennelse og anerkjennelse [Understanding and recognition], pp. 33–60. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
6.
BaeB. (1996a) Det interessante i det alminnelige — En artikkelsamling [The interesting in the ordinary — A collection of articles]. Oslo: Pedagogisk Forum.
7.
BaeB. (1996b) The Child as a Learner in Preschool Institutions, in BefringE. (Ed.) Teacher Education for Equality, pp. 152–158. Papers from the 20th annual conference of the Association for Teacher Education in Europe. Oslo: Oslo University College.
8.
BaeB. (2001) Qualitative Aspects of Dialogue Between Children and Adults in Preschool Institutions. Paper presented at the 23rd World Congress of OMEP, Santiago de Chile.
9.
BaeB. (2003) På vei i anerkenende retning [Moving in the direction of recognition], Social Kritikk [Social Critic], 88, pp. 60–71.
10.
BaeB. (2004) Dialoger mellom førskolelærer og barn — En beskrivende og fortolkende studie [Dialogues between preschool teachers and children — A descriptive and interpretive study]. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, Institute of Special Education, University of Oslo.
11.
BlochM. & PopkewitzT. (2000) Constructing the Parent, Teacher, and Child: Discourses of development, in SotoL.D. (Ed.) The Politics of Early Childhood Education, pp. 7–32. New York: Peter Lang.
12.
CannellaG. (1997) Deconstructing Early Childhood Education: Social justice and revolution. New York: Peter Lang.
13.
DahlbergG.MossP. & PenceA. (1999) Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Postmodern perspectives. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
14.
EricksonF. (1986) Qualitative Methods in Research on Teaching, in WittrockM. (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd edn, pp. 119–161. New York: Macmillan.
15.
HatchA. (1995) Ethical Conflicts in Classroom Research: Examples from a study of peer stigmatization in kindergarten, in HatchA. (Ed.) Qualitative Research in Early Childhood Settings, pp. 213–222. Westport: Praeger.
16.
HatchA. (1998) Qualitative Research in Early Childhood Education, in SpodekB.SarachoO. & PellegriniA. (Eds) Issues in Early Childhood Educational Research, pp. 49–75. New York: Teachers College Press.
LeavittR. (1995) Infant Day Care Research. Limitations and Possibilities, in ReifelS. (Ed.) Advances in Early Education and Care, vol. 7, pp. 155–178. London: JAI Press.
19.
LøvlieA.-L. (1981) (later under the name of Schibbye, A.-L.L.) Utvikling av en kvalitativ metode til studiet av ektefelleinteraksjon [Developing a qualitative method to study marital interaction], Nordisk Psykologi [Journal of Norwegian Psychology], 33(2), pp. 122–134.
20.
LøvlieA.-L. (1982a) Part Process Analysis: Toward a new method for studying interaction, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 4, pp. 261–273.
21.
LøvlieA.-L. (1982b) The Self — Yours, mine or ours?Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
22.
LøvlieA.-L. (1982c) The Self of the Therapist, Stagnation and Movement in Psychotherapy. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
23.
MoylesJ.AdamsS. & MusgroveA. (2002) Using Reflective Dialogues as a Tool for Engaging with Challenges of Defining Effective Pedagogy, Early Child Development and Care, 172(5), pp. 463–478.
24.
SchafferH.R. (1998) Making Decisions about Children: Psychological questions and answers. Oxford: Blackwell.
25.
SchibbyeA.-L.L.. (1993) The Role of ‘Acknowledgment’ in the Resolution of a Specific Interpersonal Dilemma, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 2, pp. 175–189.
26.
SchibbyeA.-L.L. (1995) Interaction and Repetition: Qualitative analyses of interactional sequences between couples in therapy. Oslo: Psykologisk institutt, Universitetet i Oslo [Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo].
27.
SchibbyeA.-L.L. (1996) Anerkjennelse — En terapeutisk intervensjon? [Recognition — A therapeutical intervention?], Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening [Journal of Norwegian Research in Psychology], 33, pp. 530–537.
28.
SchibbyeA.-L.L. (2002) En dialektisk relasjonsforståelse i psykoterapi med individ, par og familie [A dialectical understanding of relationships in therapy with individuals, couples and families]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
29.
SommerD. (1998) The Reconstruction of Childhood — Implications for theory and practice, European Journal of Social Work, 1(3), pp. 311–326.
30.
SotoL.D. (Ed.) (2000) The Politics of Early Childhood Education. New York: Peter Lang.
31.
SuranskyV. (1982) (later published under the name of Polakow) The Erosion of Childhood. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
32.
SwadenerB. & MarshM. (1995) Toward a Stronger Teacher Voice in Research: A collaborative study of antibias early education, in HatchA. (Ed.) Qualitative Research in Early Childhood Settings, pp. 173–189. Westport: Praeger.
33.
TobinJ. & DavidsonD. (1990) The Ethics of Polyvocal Ethnography: Empowering vs. textualizing children and teachers, Qualitative Studies of Education, 3, pp. 271–283.
