This article is a dialog between colleagues from different races who struggle with the complexities of doing qualitative research with participants who come from backgrounds that do not match their own. Based on transcriptions of extensive audiotaped conversations, the article explores issues related to studying across difference. The discussion is framed by four qualitative research paradigms: post-positivist, constructivist, critical/feminist, and poststructuralist.
References
1.
Barclay-McLaughlinG. (2000) Communal Isolation: Narrowing the pathways to goal attainment and work, in DanzigerS. & LinA.C. (Eds) Coping with Poverty: The social contexts of neighborhood, work, and family in the African-American Community, pp. 52–75. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2.
BergersonA. (2003) Critical Race Theory and White Racism: Is there room for white scholars in fighting racism in education?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, pp. 51–63.
3.
DillardC. (2000) The Substance of Things Hoped for, the Evidence of Things Not Seen: Examining an endarkened feminist epistemology in educational research and leadership, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, pp. 661–681.
4.
DonelsonR. & RogersT. (2004) Negotiating a Research Protocol for Studying School-based Gay and Lesbian Issues, Theory into Practice, 43, pp. 128–135.
5.
GraceA.HillR.JohnsonC.W. & LewisJ.B. (2004) In Other Words: Queer voices/dissident subjectivities impelling social change, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17, pp. 301–324.
6.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2004) New Directions in Multicultural Education: Complexities, boundaries, and critical race theory, in BanksJ. & BanksC.A. (Eds) The Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education, 2nd edn, pp. 50–67. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
LeeC.D. (2003) Why We Need to Re-think Race and Ethnicity in Educational Research, Educational Researcher, 32, pp. 128–135.
8.
LevinsonB.A. (1998) How Can a Man Do Feminist Ethnography of Education?Qualitative Inquiry, 4, pp. 337–368.
9.
PillowW. (2002) When a Man Does Feminism Should He Dress in Drag?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(5), pp. 545–554.
10.
StanfieldJ.III & DennisR.M. (Eds) (1993) Race and Ethnicity in Research Methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
11.
TateW.F.IV (1997) Critical Race Theory and Education: History, theory, and implications, in AppleM.W. (Ed.) Review of Research in Education, 22, pp. 195–247. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
12.
TillmanL.C. (2002) Culturally Sensitive Research Approaches: An African-American perspective, Educational Researcher, 31, pp. 3–12.
13.
VincentC. & WarrenS. (2001) This Won't Take Long …: Interviewing, ethics and diversity, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(1), pp. 39–53.
