In this article the author highlights some elements of the history of exclusion in Belgian infant care and how it is underpinned by constructions of motherhood. In a Belgian context, infant care means institutional care for children from birth to the age of three, funded by the Family and Health Department, in contrast to and entirely separated from pre-school for children aged three to six years, funded by the Education Department (Organisation for Economic Cooperatin and Development [OECD], 2001). The author does this from a hermeneutical historical point of view. As Escolano (1996) has claimed, this means that by means of the evaluation of the internal coherence of the stories (the organisation of data and discourse) and their external coherence with the social context and with other concordant or discordant stories, the author tries try to understand ideas and representations that may help explain the growing exclusion in Belgian infant care.
References
1.
BelskyJ. (2001) Developmental Risks (Still) Associated with Early Childcare, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, pp. 845–860.
2.
BrougèreG. & RaynaS. (1998) Culture et innovation dans l'éducation préscolaire, in BrougèreG. & RaynaS. (Eds) Culture, Enfance et Education Préscolaire [Culture, Childhood and Preschool Education], pp. 5–44. Paris: Université Paris Nord—INRP—UNESCO.
CourtoisL.PirotteJ. & RosartF. (1989) Femmes des années 80. Un siècle de condition féminine en Belgique. 1889–1989. Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia.
5.
DahlbergG.MossP. & PenceA. (1999) Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care. London: Falmer Press.
6.
DahlbergG.MossP. & PenceA. (2000) Getting beyond the Problem with Quality. European Early Childhood Educational Research Journal, 8, pp. 103–155.
7.
DeleuzeG. (1986) Foucault. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
8.
De SmetC.ProesmansR.StasseI. & Van MechelenR. (1978) Kleine kinderen, grote zorgen. Gent: Lef-Masereelfonds.
9.
De WeerdtD. (1993) De vrouwen van de Eerste Wereldoorlog. Gent: Stichting Mens en Kultuur.
10.
De WinterM. (1986) Het voorspelbare kind. Vroegtijdige onderkenning van ontwikkelingsstoornissen in wetenschappelijk en sociaal-historisch perspectief. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
11.
De WinterM.KronemanM. & BaerveldtC. (1999) The Social Education Gap Report of a Dutch Peer-Consultation Project on Family Policy, British Journal of Social Work, 29, pp. 903–914.
12.
DillonJ.StathamJ. & MossP. (2001) The Role of the Private Market in Day-Care Provision for Children in Need, Social Policy and Administration, 35, pp. 127–144.
13.
EscolanoA. (1996) Postmodernity or High Modernity? Emerging Approaches in the New History of Education, Paedagogica Historica, XXXII, pp. 325–341. Gent: Universiteit Gent.
14.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
FoucaultM. (1975) Surveiller et punir. Paris: Gallimard.
16.
FoucaultM. (2001) L'Herméneutique du sujet. Cours au Collège de France. 1981–1982. Paris: Seuil/Gallimard.
17.
HendrickH. (1997) Constructions and Reconstructions of British Childhood: An interpretative survey, 1800 to the present, in JamesA. & ProutA. (Eds) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood, pp. 34–62. London: Falmer Press.
18.
HultqvistK. & DahlbergG. (2001) The Changing Child in a Changing World. London: Routledge.
19.
HumbletP. (1998) Analyse et évaluation de la mise en oeuvre du programma de l'Oeuvre Nationale de l'Enfance pour les milieux d'accueil de jeunes enfants. Doctoral thesis. Brussels: Faculté de Médecine, ULB.
20.
LecointeA.BoucheryA.Van WijnendaeleN.PedeN.DuclosN. & De SchepperC. (1899) Crèche Louise-Marie. Statuts et règlements. Arrêtées en Assemblée Générale le 16 février 1899. Ostende: Imprimerie Bouchery.
21.
LucJ. (1997) L'invention du jeune enfant au XIXe siècle. De la salle d'asile à l'école maternelle. Paris: Belin.
22.
McGurckH.CaplanM.HennessyE. & MossP. (1993) Controversy, Theory and Social Context in Contemporary Day Care Research, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, pp. 3–23.
23.
MossP.DillonJ. & StathamJ. (2000) The ‘Child in Need’ and ‘the Rich Child’: Discourse, constructions and practice, Critical Social Policy, 20, pp. 233–254.
24.
MozèreL. (1992) Le printemps des crèches. Histoire et analyse d'un mouvement. Paris: L'Harmattan.
25.
Nationaal Werk voor Kinderwelzijn. (1973) Werkverslag van de commissie der kribben en peutertuinen. Intern document. Brussels: NWK.
26.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Early Child Care Research Network (1993) The NICHD Study of Early Child Care: A comprehensive longitudinal study of young children's lives. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 353 0870.
27.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2001) Starting Strong. Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD.
28.
PeetersJ. (1993) Quality Improvement in the Childcare Centres, in BaekelmansR.LaeversF.PeetersJ.SomersA. & VandenbroeckM. (Eds) Working towards Better Childcare. Report over Thirteen Years of Research and Training with the Support of the Van Leer Foundation and Child and Family, pp. 45–84. Gent: RUG—VBJK.
29.
PlaskyE. (1910) La crèche et sa nécessité sociale. Conférence donnée le 5 février 1910 à l'Exposition d'Hygiène des enfants du premier âge. Anvers: Buschmann.
30.
PopkewitzT. (2000) Educational Knowledge. Changing Relationships between the State, Civil Society, and the Educational Community. Albany: State University of New York.
31.
ScholliersP. (1995) A Century of Real Industrial Wages in Belgium, 1840–1939, in ScholliersP. & ZamagniV. (Eds) Labour's Reward: Real wages and economic change in 19th and 20th century Europe, pp. 106–137. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
32.
SingerE. (1993) Shared Care for Children, Theory and Psychology, 3, pp. 429–449.
33.
StormsB. (1995) Het mattheüs-effect in de kinderopvang. Antwerpen: Centrum voor Sociaal Beleid—UIA.
34.
TobinJ.WuD. & DavidsonD. (1989) Preschool in Three Cultures: Japan, China and the United States. New Haven: Yale University Press.
35.
VandellD. (2002) Early Childcare and Children's Development Prior to School Entry: Results from a NICHD study of early childcare, American Educational Research Journal, 39, pp. 133–164.
36.
VandenbroeckM. (2001) The View of the Yeti. bringing up children in the spirit of self-awareness and kindredship. The Hague: Van Leer Foundation.
37.
Van IjzendoornM.TavecchioL.StalsG. & ReilingE. (1998) Quality of Center Day-Care and Attunement between Parents and Caregiver: Center day-care in cross-national perspective, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159, pp. 437–454.
38.
VelgeH. (1940) De bedrijvigheid van het Nationaal Werk voor Kinderwelzijn tijdens vijf en twintig jaar (1915–1940). Brussels: NWK.
39.
VerheggeK. (1994) De beoordelingsschaal voor het pedagogisch functioneren in kinderdagverblijven. Brussels: K & G.
40.
VerreydtG. (1986) Kinderopvang in de provincie Antwerpen. Beschrijving van het aanbod en de participatie aan voorzieningen voor kinderopvang, Het Kind, 1, pp. 15–26.
41.
WoodheadM. (1988) When Psychology Informs Public Policy. The Case of Early Childhood Intervention, American Psychologist, 43, pp. 443–454.
42.
WoodheadM. (1997) Psychology and the Cultural Construction of Children's Needs, in JamesA. & ProutA. (Eds) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood, pp. 63–84. London: Falmer Press.
