This article describes the type of problems young children (aged six) generated in problem-posing contexts. With support, the children began to generate increasingly sophisticated problems that were open-ended in nature. The problem-solving situations provided opportunities for the children to pose problems they enjoyed solving and promoted both a more complex and motivating learning environment. The results indicate that the problem-posing actions of students can be nurtured by teachers' actions.
References
1.
EllertonN.F. (1986) Children's Made-up Mathematical Problems: A new perspective on talented mathematicians, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17, pp. 261–271.
2.
EnglishL. (1997a) Promoting a Problem-posing Classroom, Teaching Children Mathematics, 3, pp. 172–179.
3.
EnglishL. (1997b) The Development of Fifth-grade Children's Problem-posing Abilities, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, pp. 183–217.
4.
KilpatrickJ. (1987) Problem Formulating: Where do good problems come from? in SchoenfeldA.H. (Ed.) Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, pp. 123–147. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
KulmG. (1994) Mathematics Assessment: What works in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
LeungS.K. (1996) Problem Posing as Assessment: Reflections and reconstructions, The Mathematics Educator, 1, pp. 159–171.
7.
LowrieT. (1998) The Importance of Visual Processing in Non-routine and Novel Problem-solving Situations, in McIntoshA. & EllertonN. (Eds) Research in Mathematics Education: Some current trends, pp. 186–210. Perth, Western Australia: MASTEC Publication.
8.
LowrieT. (1999) Free Problem Posing: Year 3/4 students constructing problems for friends to solve, in TruranJ. & TruranK. (Eds) Making a Difference, pp. 328–335. Panorama, South Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
9.
LowrieT. (2000) Grade 1 Children in Problem-posing Contexts: Problem solving prior to completing the task, in BanaJ. & ChapmanA. (Ed.) Mathematics Education Beyond 2000, pp. 385–393. Refereed Proceedings of the Annual Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Conference, Fremantle.
10.
LowrieT. & WhitlandJ. (2000) Problem Posing as a Tool for Learning, Planning and Assessment in the Primary School, in NakaharaT. & KoyamaM. (Eds) Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, pp. 247–254. Hiroshima, Japan.
11.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1989) Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
12.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1991) Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
13.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000) Principals and Standards of School Mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
14.
SilverE.A. (1994) On Mathematical Problem Solving, For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), pp. 19–28.
15.
SilverE.A. (1995) The Nature and Use of Open Problems in Mathematics Education: Mathematical and pedagogical perspectives, International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 27, pp. 67–72.
16.
SilverE. & CaiJ. (1993) Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing by Middle School Students, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Atlanta.
17.
SilverE.A.LeungS. & CaiJ. (1995) Generating Multiple Solutions for a Problem: A comparison of the responses of U.S and Japanese, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28, pp. 35–54.
18.
SilverE.A.Mamona-DownsJ.LeungS. & KennyP.A. (1996) Posing Mathematical Problems in a Complex Environment: An exploratory study, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, pp. 293–309.
19.
StoyanovaE. (1998) Problem Posing in Mathematics Classrooms, in McIntoshA. & EllertonN. (Eds) Research in Mathematics Education: A contemporary perspective, pp. 164–185. Edith Cowan University: MASTEC.
20.
van den Heuvel-PanhuizenM.MiddletonJ. & StreeflandL. (1995) Student-generated Problems: Easy and difficult problems on percentage, For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), pp. 21–27.
