The authors describe a model for feminist-based early childhood practice from two perspectives: the classroom teacher and the teacher educator. Using examples from their own work, the authors outline the assumptions and the principles which guide their work with children and adults. Implications for the field are discussed.
References
1.
AckerJ.BarryK. & EsseveldJ. (1983) Objectivity and Truth: Problems in doing feminist research, Women's Studies International Forum, 6, pp. 423–435.
2.
AlexanderJ. (1982) Theoretical Knowledge in Sociology, Volume 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
BelenkyM.F.ClinchyB.M.GoldbergerN.R. & TaruleJ.M. (1986) Women's Ways of Knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
4.
BlochM.N. (1991) Critical Science and the History of Child Development's Influence on Early Education Research, Early Education and Development, 2, pp. 95–108.
5.
BlochM.N. (1992) Critical Perspectives on the Historical Relationship between Child Development and Early Childhood Education Research, in KesslerS. & SwadenerB. B. (Eds) Reconceptualizing the Early Childhood Curriculum: Beginning the dialogue, pp. 3–20. New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
BredekampS. & CoppleC. (Eds) (1997) Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs, revised edn.Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
7.
CannellaG.S. (1997) Deconstructing Early Childhood Education: Social justice and revolution. New York: Peter Lang.
8.
CookT.D. (1985) Postpositivist Critical Multiplism, in ShotlandL. & MarkM. M. (Eds) Social Science and Social Policy, pp. 21–62. Beverly Hills: Sage.
9.
DelpitL.D. (1988) The Silenced Dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children, Harvard Educational Review, 58, pp. 280–298.
10.
Derman-SparksL. (1989) Anti-bias Curriculum: Tools for empowering young children. Washington DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
11.
DonovanJ. (1985) Feminist Theory: The intellectual traditions of American feminism. New York: Frederick Unger.
12.
EisensteinZ.R. (1982) The Sexual Politics of the New Right: Understanding the ‘crisis of liberalism’ for the 1980s, in KeohaneN. O.RosaldoM. Z. & GelpiB. C. (Eds) Feminist Theory: A critique of ideology, pp. 77–98. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
FerreeM.M. (1990) Beyond Separate Spheres: Feminism and family research, Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, pp. 866–884.
14.
FoucaultM. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon.
15.
FraserN. (1989) Unruly Practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
GergenM.M. (1988) Building a Feminist Methodology, Contemporary Social Psychology, 13, pp. 47–53.
17.
GoldsteinL.S. (1997) Teaching with Love: A feminist approach to early childhood education. New York: Peter Lang.
18.
JipsonJ.A. (1991) Developmentally Appropriate Practice: Culture, curriculum, connections, Early Education and Development, 2, pp. 120–136.
19.
JipsonJ.A. (1992) The Emergent Curriculum: Contextualizing a feminist perspective, in KesslerS. & SwadenerB. B. (Eds) Reconceptualizing the Early Childhood Curriculum: Beginning the dialogue, pp. 149–161. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
KellerE.F. (1982) Feminism and Science, Signs, 7, pp. 589–602.
21.
MacKinnonC.A. (1982) Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An agenda for theory, in KeohaneN. O.RosaldoM. Z. & GelpiB. C. (Eds) Feminist Theory: A critique of ideology, pp. 1–30. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
MillerJ.L. (1992) Teachers, Autobiography, and Curriculum: Critical and feminist perspectives, in KesslerS. & SwadenerB. B. (Eds) Reconceptualizing the Early Childhood Curriculum: Beginning the dialogue, pp. 103–122. New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
National Association for the Education of Young Children (1996) Guidelines for Preparation of Early Childhood Professional.sWashington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
24.
NoddingsN. (1984) Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
ReinhartzS. (1992) Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
RigerS. (1992) Epistemological Debates, Feminist Voices: Science, social values, and the study of women, American Psychologist, 47, pp. 730–740.
27.
SadkerM. & SadkerD. (1994) Failing at Fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Touchstone/Simon & Schuster.
28.
SawyerC. (1993) Democratic Practices at the Elementary School Level: Three portraits, in BermanS. & La FargeP. (Eds) Promising Practices in Teaching Responsibilities. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
29.
VygotskyL.S. (1978) Mind in Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
30.
WalkerA.J.MartinKees S.S. & ThompsonL. (1988) Feminist Programs for Families, Family Relations, 37, pp. 17–22.
31.
WalkerA.J. & ThompsonL. (1984) Feminism and Family Studies, Journal of Family Issues, 5, pp. 545–570.
32.
EllsworthE. (1989) Why Doesn't this Feel Empowering? Working through the repressive Myths of Critical Pedagogy, Harvard Review of Education, 59, pp. 297–324.
33.
LatherP. (1986) Research as Praxis, Harvard Educational Review, 56, pp. 257–277.
34.
LatherP. (1991) Getting Smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Inc.
35.
LubeckS. (1985) Sandbox Society: Early education in black and white America. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
36.
LukeC. & GoreJ. (Eds) (1992) Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
37.
LuttrellW. (1993) ‘The Teachers, They All Had Their Pets’: Concepts of gender, knowledge, and power, Signs, 18, pp. 505–546.
38.
MillerL.B. & BizzellR.P. (1983) The Louisville Experiment: A comparison of four programs, in Consortium for Longitudinal Studies: As the twig is bent … lasting effects of preschool programs, pp. 171–199. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
39.
PaleyV.G. (1984) Boys and Girls: Superheroes in the doll corner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
PrilleltenskyI. (1989) Psychology and Status Quo, American Psychologist, 44, pp. 795–802.
41.
WeedonC. (1987) Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.
42.
WeilerK. (1988Women Teaching for Change: Gender, class and power. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
43.
WeinerG. (1985) Just a Bunch of Girls: Feminist approaches to schooling. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
