Abstract
Cross-vesting operated for over 10 years as a means of alleviating jurisdictional disputes between the different court systems in Australia. When the first challenge to its constitutional validity resulted in a 3-3 split decision in Gould v Brown1 in 1998, it was clear that it would not be long before the issue was tested again. On 17 June 1999, a differently constituted High Court handed down judgment in four cases,2 deciding by a majority of 6-1 that key provisions of the cross-vesting schemes under consideration were invalid.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
