This paper examines the nature, process, and implication of recent community governance reforms in Shanghai with a focus on the potential role of these institutional innovations in generating social solidarity as heralded by social capital and civil society theories. Case analysis demonstrates that the practice of democratic governance creates institutional space and organizational resources for informal, public, and day-to-day engagement among residents. The elected residents’ committee system has become an extraordinary source of community sociability and solidarity. This is summarized and explained by the notion of “empowered autonomy,” in which state-led governance reforms stimulate and thicken horizontal networks and norms of reciprocity within a society.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaiocchiG. (2003). Emergent public spheres: Talking politics in participatory governance.American Sociological Review, 68 (1), 52–74.
2.
Bamboo Garden Resident Committee Office. (1999a). Juweihui xuanju gongzuo jihua [The schedule of residents committee election]. Working report.
3.
Bamboo Garden Resident Committee Office. (1999b). Minxuan juweihui zuzhi kuangjia [The Framework of elected resident committee]. Working report.
4.
Bamboo Garden Resident Committee Office. (2002). Jumin shequ canyu diaocha baogao [A survey report on residents’ community participation]. Working report.
5.
Bamboo Garden Resident Committee Office. (2003). Zhuyuan xiaoqu de juminxiaozu qingkuang [Sketch of sub-groups in Bamboo Garden Community]. Working report.
6.
BenewickR.TongI. & HowellJ. (2004). Self-governance and community: A preliminary comparison between villagers’ committee and urban community councils.China Information XVIII, (1), 11–28.
7.
BermanS. (1997). Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic.World Politics, 49 (30), 401–29.
8.
ChanC. L. (1993). The myth of neighborhood mutual help: The contemporary Chinese community-based welfare system in Guangzhou. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
9.
ChengT. & SeldenM. (1994) The origin and social consequence of China's hukou System.China Quarterly, 139, 664–668.
10.
Civil Affairs Bureau of Luwan District Government. (2001). Sanhui zhidu yibaili [One-hundred examples of how to work ‘three meetings']. Working report.
11.
ColemanJ. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
DavisD. S. (2004). Talking about property in the new Chinese domestic property regime. In Frank Dobbin (Ed.) The New Economic Sociology.New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 288–307.
13.
DerlethJ. & KoldykD. (2004). The Shequ experiment: Grassroots political reform in urban China.Journal of Contemporary China, 13 (41), 747–777.
LeeM. (2000). Chinese occupational welfare in market transition.China Quarterly, 164, 1084–85.
25.
LeviM. (1998). A state of trust. In BraithwaiteV. & LeviM. (Eds.) Trust & Governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. pp. 77–101
26.
LewisJ. W. (1986). The city in communist China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
LieberthalK. (1989). Revolution and tradition in Tientsin, 1949–1952. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
LinS. & MaY. (2000). Shequ zuzhi yu juweihui jianshe: Shanghai pudong xinqu yanjiu baogao [Community organization and residents’ committee building: A research report from Pudong New District, Shanghai]. Shanghai: Shanghai University Press.
29.
LinS. (2002). Zhengdang yu shequ zizhi: dui dang, guojia yu shehui guanxi de weiguan kaocha [Political party vs. community self-governance: A micro exploration of the relationship among party, state and society]Zhongguo Yanjiu [China Studies], 8, 19–36.
30.
LiuC. (2006) Social change and neighborhood policy in Shanghai.Policy and Society25 (1), 133–156.
31.
LiuC. (2005a). The emerging urban grassroots democracy: A case study of community building and neighborhood activism in Shanghai.The Virginia Review of Asian Studies, VIII (Fall), 25–42.
32.
LiuC. (2005b). Zhongguo chengshi sheu xuanju de lilun xiangxiang [Mapping community election in urban China].Shehui [Society] 239 (1), 119–143.
33.
LiuY. (2003). Xieshang zhengzhi: shequ jingying yu gonggong canyu [Deliberative politics: community elite and public participation]. In LinS. (Ed.) Shequ minzhu yu zhili: anli yanjiu [Cases studies of community democratic governance]Beijing: Shehui kexue Wenxian Chubanshe. pp. 198–230.
34.
LuX. & PerryE. (Eds.). (1997). Danwei: the changing Chinese Workplace in historical and comparative perspectives. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
35.
PanT. (2002). Neighborhood Shanghai: Community building in Five Mile Bridge. PhD Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge.
36.
PutnamR. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
37.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community.New York: Touchstone.
38.
ReadB. L. (1999). Revitalizing the state's urban ‘nerve tips.”’ The China Quarterly, 163, 806–820.
39.
ReadB. L. (2003a). State, social networks, and citizens in China's urban neighborhood. PhD Dissertation, Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
40.
ReadB. L. (2003b). Democratizing the neighborhood? New private housing and homeowner self-organization in urban China.” The China Journal, 49, 31–59.
41.
RothsteinB. & StolleD. (2003). Social capital, impartiality, and the welfare state: An institutional approach. In HoogheM. & StolleD. (Eds.). Generating social capital: The role of voluntary associations, institutions and government policy. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
42.
SalaffJ. (1971). Urban neighborhood committees in the wake of the Cultural Revolution. In LewisJ. (Ed.). The city in communist China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 298–324.
43.
SalaffJ. (1967). Urban communes and anti-city experiments in communist China.The China Quarterly29, 82–109.
44.
SchurmannF. (1968). Ideology and organization in communist China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
45.
ShiK. & PanL. (1998). Liangji zhengfu, sanji guanli [Two layers of government, three layers of administration]. Shanghai: Shanghai Remin Chubanshe.
46.
SidelR. (1974). Families of Fengsheng: Urban life in China.Baltimore: Penguin Books.
47.
TangY. (2004). Buwanquan qiyue: shehui bianqian zhong de shequ zhili jiegou [Incomplete contract formation: Community governance structure in a transitional society].Shanghai xingzheng xueyuan xuebao [The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute], 18 (2), 68–78.
48.
TarrowS. (1996). Making democracy work across space and time.American Political Science Review, 90 (2), 389–398.
49.
UngerJ. (1989). State and peasant in post-revolution China.Journal of Peasant Studies, 17, 114–36.
50.
VogelE. F. (1971). Preserving order in the cities. In LewisJ. (Ed). The city in communist China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 75–96.
51.
WalderA. G. (1986). Communist Neo-traditionalism: Work and authority in Chinese industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
52.
WangS. (1993). The politics of private time: Changing leisure patterns in urban China. In DavisD. (Ed.). Urban spaces in contemporary China: Autonomy and community in contemporary China.Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–172.
53.
WhyteM. K. & ParishW. L. (1984). Urban life in contemporary China.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
WongL. (1998). Marginalization and social welfare in China. New York: Routledge.
55.
WuF. (2002). China's changing urban governance in the transition towards a more market-oriented economy.Urban Studies, 39, 1071–1093.
56.
XuZ. (2000). Shanghai shequ fazhan baogao (1996–2000) [Report of community development in Shanghai (1996–2000)]. Shanghai: Shanghai University Press.
57.
YangK. (2002). From ‘danwei’ society to new community building: Opportunities and challenges for citizen participation in Chinese cities.Chinese Public Administration Review, 1 (1), 65–82.
ZhuJ. (1999). Guojia, quanli yu jiequ kongjian [State, power and street community space].Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Jikan [Chinese Social Science Quarterly], 26, 171–193.
60.
ZhuJ. (2002). Zai guo yu jia zhijian: shanghai linong de shiminzuzhi yu shequ yundong de minzuzhi [Between the family and the state: An ethnography of the civil associations and community movement in a Shanghai Linong neighborhood].Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
