In the absence of satisfactory accounts by evolutionary biologists to explain the ubiquity and persistence of art in all human societies, a number of reasons offered by other writers for the existence and effects of art are critically examined for their evolutionary plausibility. These are found to be inadequate because they are only partial and because their “selective value” is more parsimoniously attributed to other behaviors and attributes which art resembles (e.g., play, ritual, fantasy, ordering, and so forth). The necessity for invoking a concept “art” at all is questioned. Instead it is posited that a universal human behavior, “making special,” from which art in the modern sense is derived had evolutionary value because it reinforced the adoption of other selectively-valuable behaviors. Aesthetic ingredients and responses can be called enabling mechanisms to this end. A concluding section discusses peculiarities of advanced technological society that contribute to modern confusion about art and its place — necessary or unnecessary — in human life.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SpencerH., On the Origin and Function of Music (1857) in Essays On Education, Dent, London, 1949.
2.
SpencerH., The Aesthetic Sentiments, Ch. IX in Principles of PsychologyII-2, Williams and Norgate, London, 1880–1882.
3.
SullyJ.Art and Psychology, MindI, Macmillan, London, 1876.
4.
GuyauJ. M., L'art au point de vue sociologique, F. Alcan, Paris, 1889.
5.
GrosseE., The Beginnings of Art, Appleton, New York, 1897.
6.
HirnY., The Origins of Art, Macmillan, London, 1900.
7.
LakoffG. and JohnsonM., Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980.
8.
WorringerW., Abstraction and Empathy, International Universities Press, New York, 1953 (originally published, 1908).
9.
LeeV., The Beautiful, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1913.
10.
PickfordR. W., Psychology and Visual Aesthetics, Hutchinson, 1972.
11.
KreitlerH. and KreitlerS., Psychology of the Arts, Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., 1972.
12.
FreudS., The Economic Problem of Masochism, Standard Edition, vol. 19, (originally published, 1924), Hogarth and the Institute of Psychoanalysis, London.
13.
LaskiM., Ecstasy, Cresset, London, 1961.
14.
StokesA., The Image in Form, Penguin, London, 1972.
15.
NietzscheF., Die Geburt der Tragödie, 1872.
16.
RankO., Art and Artist, Tudor, New York, 1932.
17.
Aristotle, Poeticsvi. 2.
18.
LewisI. M., Ecstatic Religion, Penguin, London, 1971.
19.
ReillyM. (ed.), Play as Exploratory Learning, Sage, New York, 1974.
FordhamM., Children as Individuals, Hodder and Stoughton, London, 1969.
22.
GardnerH., The Arts and Human Development, Wiley, New York, 1973.
23.
BarzunJ., The Use and Abuse of Art, Bollingen Series 35, Princeton, N.J., 1974.
24.
BurnshawS., The Seamless Web, Braziller, New York, 1970.
25.
DeweyJ., Art as Experience, Capricorn, New York, p. 200, 1956 (originally published, 1934).
26.
ReadH., Icon and Idea, Faber and Faber, London, 1955.
27.
ReadH., The Forms of Things Unknown, Faber and Faber, London, 1960.
28.
MandelD., Changing Art, Changing Man, Horizon, New York, 1967.
29.
SchillerF., Letters on the Aesthetic Education of Man, WilkinsonE. H. and WilloughbyL. A., eds., Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1967, 14th Letter (originally published, 1795).
GroosK., The Play of Animals, Macmillan, New York, 1898 (originally published, 1896).
32.
GroosK., The Play of Man, Appleton, New York, 1901 (originally published, 1899).
33.
BrunerJ. S., The Nature and Uses of Immaturity, American Psychologist, 27, pp. 687–708, 1972.
34.
LancyD. F., Play in Species Adaptation, Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, pp. 471–495, 1980.
35.
AllandA., The Artistic Animal, Anchor, Garden City, N.Y., 1977.
36.
KlingerE., Structure and Functions of Fantasy, Wiley Interscience, New York, 1971.
37.
JenkinsI., Art and the Human Enterprise, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1958.
38.
BerlyneD. E., Aesthetics and Psychobiology, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1971.
39.
StorrA., The Dynamics of Creation, Secker & Warburg, London, 1972.
40.
HumphreyN. K., Natural Aesthetics, in MikellidesB. (ed.) Architecture for People, Studio Vista, London, 1980.
41.
GombrichE. H., The Sense of Order, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 1980.
42.
PeckhamM., Man's Rage for Chaos, Chilton, Philadelphia, 1965.
43.
TurnerV., The Ritual Process, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1969.
44.
CassirerE., Art, An Essay on Man, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1971.
45.
YoungJ. Z., An Introduction to the Study of Man, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1971.
46.
PeacockJ. L., Rites of Modernization, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1968.
47.
SmithE. E. and MedinD. L., Categories and Concepts, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1981.
48.
EllisJ. M., The Theory of Literary Criticism, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1974.
49.
DissanayakeE., Art As a Human Behavior: Toward an Ethological View of Art, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Cricitism, 38, pp. 397–406, 1980.
50.
DissanayakeE., Aesthetic Experience and Human Evolution, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 41, pp. 145–155, 1982.
51.
OakleyK. P., The Emergence of Higher Thought 3.0–0.2 Ma B.P., The Emergence of Man, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B292, pp. 205–211, 1981.
52.
SmithW. J., Ritual and the Ethology of Communicating, in d'AquiliE. G.LaughlinC. D.Jr. and McManusJ., The Spectrum of Ritual, Columbia University Press, New York, 1979.
53.
WilsonE. O., On Human Nature, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1978.
54.
DissanayakeE., A Hypothesis of the Evolution of Art From Play, Leonardo, 7, pp. 211–217, 1974.
55.
DissanayakeE., An Ethological View of Ritual and Art in Human Evolutionary History, Leonardo, 12, pp. 27–31, 1979.
56.
ThorpeW. H., Ritualization in the Individual Development of Bird Song, in HuxleyJ. (ed.) A Discussion on Ritualization of Behavior in Animals and Man, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, B 251, pp. 351–358, 1966.
57.
DawkinsR. and KrebsJ. R., Animal Signals: Information or Manipulation? In KrebsJ. R. and DaviesN. B. (eds.), Behavioural Ecology, Blackwell, Oxford, 1978.
