This article examines cognitive and emotional responses produced while reading a short story. The text was presented in the original and in two modified versions, which differed in the presence or absence of anticipations. Readers were presented with a questionnaire concerning their responses. Effects of text version, gender, and type of academic studies were examined. A factorial analysis explored the underlying dimensions of the 15 variables. Three factors emerged, concerning readers' participation in the story, responses to the violation of their expectations, and cognitive evaluation of the textual features that make the story comprehensible. Women scored significantly higher on the first factor and the presence or absence of anticipations significantly influenced the second factor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BonheimH. (1982). How stories begin: Devices of exposition in 600 English, American and Canadian short stories. R.E.A.L., 1, 191–226.
2.
BrewerW. F. (1996). Good and bad story ending and story completedness. In KreuzR. J. & MacNealyM. S. (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 261–274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3.
BrewerW. F., & LichtensteinE. H. (1981). Event schemes, story schemes and story grammars. In LongJ. D. & BaddeleyA. D. (Eds.), Attention and performance IX, (pp. 363–379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
BrewerW. F., & LichtensteinE. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 473–486.
5.
BrombertV. (1980). Opening signals in narrative. New Literary History, 11, 489–502.
6.
CortiM. (1976). Principi della comunicazione letteraria [An introduction to literary semiotics]. Milan: Bompiani.
7.
CupchikG. C., & GebotysR. J. (1990). Interest and pleasure as dimensions of aesthetic response. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8 (1), 1–14.
8.
de MauroT. (1980). Guida all'uso delle parole [Guide to word use]. Rome: Editori Riuniti.
9.
EcoU. (1979). Lector in fabula [The reader in the story]. Milan: Bompiani.
10.
GernsbacherM. A.GoldsmithH. H., & RobertsonR. W. (1992). Do readers mentally represent characters' emotional states?Cognition and Emotion, 6, 89–111.
11.
GerrigR. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. On the psychological activities of reading, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
GerrigR. J. (1996). Participatory aspects on narrative understanding. In KreuzR. J. & MacNealyM. S. (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 127–142). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13.
GraesserA. C.SingerM., & TrabassoT. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
14.
HalászL.ShortM., & VargaA. (2002). A cross-cultural study of fictional and non-fictional text understanding. Poetics, 30, 195–219.
15.
HidiS. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571.
16.
Iran-NejadA. (1987). Cognitive and affective causes of interest and liking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(2), 120–130.
17.
Iran-NejadA., & OrtonyA. (1985). Qualitative and quantitative sources of affect: How valence and unexpectedness relate to pleasantness and preference. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 257–278.
18.
JosèP. E., & BrewerW. F. (1984). Development of story liking: Character identification, suspense and outcome resolution. Developmental Psychology, 20, 911–924.
19.
KintschW. (1980). Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway?Poetics, 9, 87–98.
20.
KintschW. (1996). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
LevoratoM. C. (2000). Le emozioni della lettura [The emotions of reading]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
22.
LevoratoM. C. (2003). Cognitive and emotional responses to short stories. Paper presented at the 10th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Padua, Italy.
23.
LevoratoM. C., & BoscoloP. (2000). Cognitive and affective factors in the reading of narrative text. Paper presented at the 10th Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Lion, France.
24.
LevoratoM. C.NemesioA., & RonconiL. (2004). Risposta emotiva e qualità del testo nella lettura del racconto del mistero [Emotional response and text quality in the reading of a mystery story]. Età evolutiva, 79, 60–67.
25.
LoewensteinG. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychology Bulletin, 116, 75–98.
26.
LucisanoP. (1992). Misurare le parole [Measuring words]. Rome: Kepos.
27.
LucisanoP., & PiemonteseM. E. (1988). GULPEASE: Una formula per la predizione della difficoltà dei testi in lingua italiana [GULPEASE: A formula to predict difficulty in Italian texts]. Scuola e città, 3, 110–124.
28.
MiallD. S. (1989). Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 55–78.
MiallD. S., & KuikenD. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 37–58.
31.
MiallD. S., & KuikenD. (1999). What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28, 121–138.
32.
NemesioA. (1990). Le prime parole. L'uso dell'incipit nella narrativa dell'Italia unita [First words. The use of the incipit in the narrative literature of unified Italy]. Alessandria: Edizioni dell'Orso.
33.
NemesioA. (2000). Some questions for empirical research. Versus, 85-87, 447–460.
34.
NemesioA. (2002). La costruzione del testo. Ricerche empiriche su testi italiani dell'Otto-Novecento [Text construction. Empirical research on eighteenth and nineteenth Italian texts]. Turin: Thélème.
35.
OhtsukaK., & BrewerW. F. (1992). Discourse organization in the comprehension of temporal order in narratives. Discourse Processes, 15, 317–336.
36.
RobertsD. S.CowenP. S., & MacDonaldB. E. (1996). Effects of narrative structure and emotional content on cognitive and evaluative responses to film and text. Empirical Studies of the Art, 14(1), 33–47.
37.
SadoskiM.GoetzE. T., & RodriguezM. (2000). Engaging texts: Effects of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest and recall in four text types. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 85–95.
38.
SaidE. W. (1975). Beginnings: Intention and method, New York: Basic Books.
39.
SchankR. C. (1979). Interestingness: Controlling inferences. Artificial intelligence, 12, 273–297.
40.
SchiefeleU. (1991). Interest, learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299–324.
41.
SchrawG.BruningR., & SvobodaC. (1995). Sources of situational interest. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 1–17.
42.
SegreC. (1985). Avviamento all'analisi del testo letterario [Introduction to the analysis of the literary text]. Turin: Einaudi.
43.
TanE. S. (1996). Emotion and the structure of narrative film. Film as an emotion machine. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44.
TarchettiI. U. (1967). Uno spirito in un lampone [A spirit in a raspberry]. In GhidettiE. (Ed.), Tutte le opere (vol. 2, pp. 73–85). Bologna: Cappelli. (Reprinted from Racconti fantastici, 1869. Milan: Treves).
45.
TodorovT. (1970). Introduction à la littérature fantastique [An introduction to fantastic literature]. Paris: Seuil.
46.
TodorovT. (1971). The two principles of narrative. Diacritics, 3, 39–53.
47.
van OostendorpH., & ZwaanR. A. (1994). Naturalistic text comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
48.
WadeS. E., & AdamsR. B. (1990). Effects of importance and interest on recall of biographical text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 331–353.
49.
ZillmanD. (1996). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In VordererP.WulH. J., & FriedrichsenM. (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses and empirical explorations (pp. 199–231). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50.
ZillmanD., & BryantJ. (1975). Viewer's moral sanction of retribution in the appreciation of dramatic presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 572–582.
51.
ZillmanD.HayT.A., & BryantJ. (1975). The effect of suspense and its resolution on the appreciation of dramatic presentations. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 307–323.
