The problem of Native American language loss can be addressed through the use of computer-assisted technology to teach indigenous languages to Native American learners. Hypermedia technology may provide a mechanism for the development of curriculum materials which reflect appropriate instructional techniques. Whole language methods advocated in second language instruction incorporate observational learning strategies—strategies which are inherent in many Native American homes, but often ignored in school. Hypermedia holds promise as an effective development tool for the creation of Native American language instruction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DowningC., Hearing Before the Select Committee on Indian Affairs: United States Senate, (Report No. S. HRG. 102-809), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1992.
2.
White House Conference on Indian Education, Pre-Conference Recommendations: Native Language and Culture, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1992.
3.
MedicineB., “Speaking Indian”: Parameters of Language Use among American Indians, (Report No. 400-80-0040), Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs, Washington, D.C.: (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 209 052), 1981.
4.
GillilandH., Growth through Native American Learning Styles, in Teaching the Native American, GillilandH. and ReyhnerJ. (eds.), Kendall/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, Iowa, pp. 51–62, 1992.
5.
KaulbackB., Styles of Learning among Native Children: A Review of the Research, in Culture, Style and the Educative Process, ShadeB. (ed.), Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, pp. 137–149, 1989.
6.
MoreA., Native Indian Learning Styles: A Review for Researchers and Teachers, Journal of American Indian Education, 28, pp. 15–27, 1989.
7.
PepperF. and HenryS., Social and Cultural Effects on Indian Learning Style: Classroom Implications, in Culture, Style and the Educative Process, ShadeB. (ed.), Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, pp. 33–42, 1989.
8.
RhodesR., Native American Learning Styles, Journal of Navajo Education, 7: 1, pp. 33–41, 1989.
9.
SkinnerL., Teaching through Traditions: Incorporating Native Languages and Cultures into Curricula, (RC 018 612), Indian Nations at Risk Task Force, Department of Education, Washington, D.C., 1991.
10.
SwisherK. and DeyhleD., The Styles of Learning are Different but the Teaching is Just the Same: Suggestions for Teachers of American Indian Youth, Journal of American Indian Education, 28, pp. 1–13, 1989.
11.
LocustC., Wounding the Spirit: Discrimination and Traditional American Indian Belief Systems, Harvard Educational Review, 58: 3, pp. 315–330, 1988.
12.
OxfordR. and CrookallD., Research on Language Learning Strategies: Methods, Findings, and Instructional Issues, The Modern Language Journal, 73: 4, pp. 404–419, 1989.
13.
ChamotA., Student Responses to Learning Strategy Instruction in the Foreign Language Classroom, Foreign Language Annals, 26: 3, pp. 308–321, 1993.
14.
FoxS., A Whole Language Approach to the Communication Skills, in Teaching the Native American, GillilandH. and ReyhnerJ. (eds.), Kendall/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, Iowa, pp. 97–105, 1992.
15.
KastenW., Bridging the Horizon: American Indian Beliefs and Whole Language Learning, Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 23, pp. 108–119, 1992.
16.
MontgomeryJ., Natural Texts and Delayed Oral Production: An Indigenous Method for the Teaching of American Indian Languages, in Bilingualism and Language Contact: Spanish, English, and Native American Languages, BarkinF.BrandtE., and Ornstein-GalaciaJ. (eds.), Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 241–250, 1982.
17.
GaleL. and BrownB., A Theory of Learning and Skill-Acquisition Applied to Interactive Video, Activities at the David O. McKay Institute, Brigham Young University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. Ed 278 252), 1985.
18.
ShrumJ. and GlisanE., Teacher's Handbook: Contextualized Language Instruction, Heinle and Heinle Publishers, Boston, 1994.
19.
GoodmanY. and GoodmanK., Vygotsky in a Whole Language Perspective, in Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Sociohistorical Psychology, MollL. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 223–250, 1990.
20.
KrashenS., Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition, Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, 1982.
21.
Richard-AmatoP., Making it Happen: Interaction in the Second Language Classroom, Longman, White Plains, New York, 1988.
22.
Language Development & Hypermedia Research Group, Open Software Design: A Case Study, Educational Technology, 32: 2, pp. 43–55, 1992.
23.
ReyhnerJ., Teaching the Native Language, in Teaching the Native American, GillilandH. and ReyhnerJ. (eds.), Kendall/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, Iowa, pp. 139–147, 1992.
24.
GallimoreR. and TharpR., Teaching Mind in Society: Teaching, Schooling, and Literate Discourse, in Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Sociohistorical Psychology, MollL. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 175–205, 1990.
25.
ThomasR., Comparing Theories of Child Development, Wadsworth, Belmont, California, 1979.
26.
WilkinsonL., Communicating in the Classroom, Academic Press, New York, 1982.
27.
Cook-GumperzJ. and GumperzJ., Communicative Competence in Educational Perspective, in Communicating in the Classroom, WilkinsonL. (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 13–26, 1982.
28.
YangJ. S., Theories, Templates, and Tools for Designing and Developing Instructional Hypermedia Systems, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, 1994.
29.
GayG. and MazurJ., Conceptualizing a Hypermedia Design for Language Learning, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 4, pp. 119–126, 1989.
30.
HerronC. and MoosM., Electronic Media in the Foreign and Literature Classroom: A Fusion between Science and the Humanities, Foreign Language Annals, 26: 4, pp. 479–490, 1993.
31.
GleimC. and HarveyF., Viewing Hypermedia through the Prism of Evaluation, Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, USA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 347 990), 1992.
32.
JonassenD., Designing Structured Hypertext and Structuring Access to Hypertext, Educational Technology, 28: 11, pp. 13–16, 1988.
33.
MarchioniniG., Hypermedia and Learning: Freedom and Chaos, Educational Technology, 28: 11, pp. 8–12, 1988.
34.
NelsonW. and PalumboD., Learning, Instruction, and Hypermedia, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1, pp. 287–299, 1992.
35.
SpiroR. and JehngJ., Cognitive Flexibility and Hypertext: Theory and Technology for the Nonlinear and Multidimensional Traversal of Complex Subject Matter, in Cognition, Education, & Multimedia, NixD. and SpiroR. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 163–205, 1990.
36.
AmbroseD., The Effects of Hypermedia on Learning: A Literature Review, Educational Technology, 31: 12, pp. 51–55, 1991.
37.
KingJ. W., Using Media in Teaching, Teaching at UNL, pp. 1–3, 1990.
38.
SpencerD., Technology in the Classroom, in Teaching the Native American, GillilandH. and ReyhnerJ. (eds.), Kendall/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, Iowa, pp. 97–106, 1992.
39.
FletcherJ., Individualized Systems of Instruction (Report No. IDA-D-1190), Institute for Defense Analysis, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 355 917, Alexandria, Virginia, 1992.
40.
BergP. and OhlerJ., Strategic Plans for Use of Modern Technology in the Education of American Indian and Alaskan Native Studies (RC 018 612), Department of Education, Indian Nations at Risk Task Force, Washington, D.C., 1991.
41.
LiuM., Hypermedia Assisted Instruction and Second Language Learning: A Semantic Network-Based Approach, in Multi-Media and Mega-Change: New Roles for Educational Computing, ReedW.BurtonJ., and LiuM. (eds.), Hawthorne, New York, 1995.
