This article presents methods for assessing sets of radiocarbon dates. It is based on the premise that the largest pertinent set of radiocarbon dates is the appropriate context within which to judge problematic dates. Using dates from the Central Plains Tradition, it illustrates a reasonable methodology for cleaning the data set and for assessing the beginnings and ends of constituent phases. In so doing, it demonstrates that the Central Plains Tradition is mis-named; most of the phases assigned to it are contemporary with one another, and most appear to have lasted only a couple of centuries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BareisCharles J. and PorterJames W.1984American Bottom Archaeology: A Summary of the FAI-270 Project Contribution to the Culture History of the Mississippi River Valley, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
2.
BlakesleeDonald J.1994Reassessment of Some Radiocarbon Dates from the Central Plains, Plains Anthropologist, 39, pp. 203–210.
3.
CalabreseF. A.1969Doniphan Phase Origins: An Hypothesis Resulting from Archaeological Investigations in the Smithville Reservoir Area, Missouri: 1968, masters thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri.
4.
ChapmanCarl H.1980The Archaeology of Missouri, II, University of Missouri Press, Columbia.
5.
JantzRichard L.OwsleyDouglas W., and WilleyP.1978, Craniometric Relationships of Central Plains Populations, in The Central Plains Tradition: Internal Development and External Relationships, BlakesleeD. (ed.), pp. 144–156, Office of the State Archaeologist, Iowa City.
6.
LoganBrad and RitterbushLauren1994Late Prehistoric Cultural Dynamics in the Lower Kansas River Basin, Central Plains Archaeology, 4:1, pp. 1–26.
7.
LongAustin and RippeteauBruce1974Testing Contemporaneity and Averaging Radiocarbon Dates, American Antiquity, 39:2, pp. 205–215.
8.
O'BrienPatricia J.1978, Steed-Kisker and Mississippian Influences on the Central Plains, in The Central Plains Tradition: Internal Development and External Relationships, BlakesleeDonald J. (ed.), pp. 67–80, Office of the State Archaeologist, Report 11, Iowa City.
9.
RoperDonna1995Spatial Dynamics and Historical Process in the Central Plains Tradition, Plains Anthropologist, 40:153, pp. 203–221.
10.
StuiverMinze and PearsonGordon W.1993High-Precision Bidecadal Calibration of the Radiocarbon Time Scale, AD 1950–500 BC and 2500–6000 BC, Radiocarbon, 35:1, pp. 1–23.
11.
TaylorR. E.1987Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective, Academic Press, Orlando.
12.
WedelWaldo R.1943Archaeological Investigations in Platte and Clay Counties, Missouri, United States National Museum of Natural History, Bulletin, 174, Washington, D.C.
13.
WedelWaldo R.1986Central Plains Prehistory: Holocene Environments and Culture Change in the Republican River Valley, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
14.
WilleyGordon R. and PhillipsPhilip1958Method and Theory in American Archaeology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
15.
WoodW. Raymond (ed.) 1969Two House Sites in the Central Plains: An Experiment in Archaeology, Plains Anthropologist Memoir, 14–44, Part 2.
