Drug abuse prevention research findings have been inconsistent. These inconsistencies can be related to several issues including study design and methodology. This article presents consensus recommendations developed to enhance drug abuse prevention evaluation research by a group of prevention researchers and practitioners who met at the National Institute on Drug Abuse in Rockville, Maryland during May 1989. As noted by the number of consensus statements, there was a high level of agreement. After exploring various aspects of evaluating prevention interventions, that agreement was reflected in specific recommendations which are directed to modifying prevention approaches; integrating epidemiologic, etiologic and intervention research methods; and expanding prevention research utilization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerberianR. M.GrossC.LovejoyJ.PaparellaC., The Effectiveness of Drug Education Programs: A Critical Review, Health Education Monograph, 4, pp. 377–398, 1976.
2.
BrauchtG. N.FollingstadD.BrakarashD.BerryK. L., Drug Education: A Review of Goals, Approaches, and Effectiveness, and a Paradigm for Evaluation, Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 11, pp. 1279–1292, 1973.
3.
GoodstadtM. S., Myths and Methodology in Drug Education: A Critical Review of Research Evidence, Research on Methods and Programs of Drug Education, GoodstadtM. S. (ed.), Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, Canada, 1974.
4.
SchappsE.DiBartoloR.MoskowitzJ.PalleyC. S.ChurginS., A Review of 127 Drug Abuse Prevention Program Evaluations, Journal of Drug Issues, 11, pp. 17–23, 1981.
5.
PentzM. A.DwyerJ. H.MacKinnonD. P.FlayB. R.HansenW. B.WangE. Y.JohnsonC. A., A Multi-Community Trial for Primary Prevention of Adolescent Drug Abuse: Effects on Drug Abuse Prevalence, Journal of the American Medical Association, 261:22, pp. 3259–3266, 1990.
6.
GlynnT. J.LeukefeldC. G.LudfordJ. P. (eds.), Preventing Adolescent Drug Abuse: Intervention Studies, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1983.
7.
DonohewL.BukoskiW.SypherW., Persuasive Communications and Drug Abuse Prevention, Erlbaum Press, in press.
8.
LeukefeldC. G., The Role of the National Institute on Drug Abuse in Drug Abuse Prevention, in Persuasive Communications and Drug Abuse Prevention, DonohewL.BukoskiW. J.SypherW. (eds.), Erlbaum Press, in press.
9.
SwisherJ. D., Prevention Issues, in Handbook on Drug Abuse, DupontR. L.GoldsteinA.O'DonnellJ. (eds.), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1979.
10.
SilvermanM. M., Prevention Research: Impediments, Barriers, and Inadequacies, Prevention Research Findings. Prevention Monograph 3, Office of Substance Abuse Prevention, pp. 24–45, Rockville, Maryland, 1990.
11.
BukoskiW. J., A Definition of Drug Abuse Prevention Research, Persuasive Communication and Drug Abuse Prevention, DonohewL.BukoskiW. J.SypherM. (eds.), Erlbaum Press, in press.
12.
LastJ. M., Scope and Methods of Prevention, Public Health and Preventative Medicine, LastJ. M. (ed.), Appleton, Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 3–18, 1980.
13.
WilnerD.WalkleyR.O'NeilE., Introduction to Public Health, MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1978.
14.
ArnoldC.KullerL.GreenlickM., (eds.), Advance in Disease Prevention, Springer Publishing Company, New York, 1981.
15.
BukoskiW. J., Drug Abuse Prevention Evaluation: A Meta Evaluation Process. A Paper Presented at The Annual Conference of the American Public Health Association, November 4–6, 1979.
16.
RudnerR. S., Philosophy of Social Sciences, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1966.
17.
FlayB. R.PetraitisJ. M., Methodological Issues in Drug Abuse Prevention Research: Theoretical Foundations, in Drug Abuse Prevention Intervention Research: Methodologic Issues, LeukefeldC. G.BukoskiW. J. (eds.), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., in press.
18.
LettieriD. J.SayersM.PearsonH. W., Theories on Drug Abuse: Selected Contemporary Perspective, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1980.
19.
HawkinsJ. D.CatalanoR. F.BridgesG. S.LakeL.GaineyR.MurphyT., A Risk Based Analysis of Drug Abuse Prevention Strategies and Prospects, unpublished manuscript, 1989.
20.
GilchristL. D., Defining the Intervention and the Target Population, in Drug Abuse Prevention Intervention Research: Methodologic Issues, LeukefeldC. G.BukoskiW. J. (eds.), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., in press.
21.
PentzM. A.TrebowE., Implementation Issues in Drug Abuse Prevention Research, in Drug Abuse Prevention Intervention Research: Methodologic Issues, LeukefeldC. G.BukoskiW. J. (ed.), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., in press.
22.
MarkM. M., Treatment Implementation, Statistical Power, and Internal Validity, Evaluation Review, 7, pp. 543–549, 1983.
23.
SnowD. L.TebesJ. R., Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs in Prevention Research, in Drug Abuse Prevention Intervention Research: Methodologic Issues, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., in press.
24.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C., Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts, 1963.
25.
BentlerP. M., Modeling Intervention Effects, in Drug Abuse Prevention Intervention Research: Methodologic Issues, LeukefeldC. G.BukoskiW. J. (eds.), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., in press.
26.
DwyerJ. N.MacKinnonD. P., Outcome Measurement Issues on Drug Abuse Prevention Studies, in Drug Abuse Prevention Intervention Research: Methodologic Issues, LeukefeldC. G.BukoskiW. J. (eds.), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., in press.
27.
HawkinsJ. D.AbbottR.CatalanoR. F.GillmoreM. R., Assessing Effectiveness of Drug Abuse Prevention: Long Term Effects and Replication, in Drug Abuse Prevention Intervention Research: Methodologic Issues, LeukefeldC. G.BukoskiW. J. (eds.), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., in press.
28.
BiglanA.WoodD.BrozovskyP.OchsL.AryD.BlackC., Subject Attrition in Prevention Research, in Drug Abuse Prevention Intervention Research: Methodologic Issues, LeukefeldC. G.BukoskiW. J. (eds.), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., in press.
29.
FormanS. G.LinneyJ. A., Increasing the Validity of Self Report Data in Effectiveness Trials, in Drug Abuse Prevention Intervention Research: Methodologic Issues, LeukefeldC. G.BukoskiW. J. (eds.), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., in press.
30.
SchinkeS. P.OrlandiM. A., Technology Transfer, in Drug Abuse Prevention Intervention Research: Methodologic Issues, LeukefeldC. G.BukoskiW. J. (eds.), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., in press.
31.
KolbeL. J.IversonD. C., Implementing Comprehensive Health Education: Educational Innovations and Social Change, Health Education Quarterly, 8, pp. 57–80, 1981.
