Abstract
Un-proctored fully asynchronous1 online courses now appear to be a reality in all discipline areas. With full degree programs being offered online, it has become a badge of honor, to some colleges, to graduate students that have never stepped foot on the physical college campus nor have never before met any college representative, faculty, or staff. To many involved in managing, teaching, and implementing these online courses, the idea of academic integrity related to courses taught in a fully online un-proctored modality is therefore of great interest and concern. This review represents a deliberate effort to distinguish the issue of academic integrity in fully asynchronous online courses into two categories: “Writing-Based” (WB) vs. “Math or Fact-Based” (MFB) courses. WB courses, which tend to be subjective in nature, include discipline areas such as English, history, psychology… . MFB courses, which emphasize calculation and/or factual recall, have a tendency to be highly objective in nature, and include discipline areas such as math, science, business, computers, medical technology… . While there are certainly significant areas of overlap in how different assessment instruments are administered in these two categories, most math and many science courses, for instance, tend to focus on calculation and fact-based assessment instruments (such as mid-term and final exams) and most English and history courses, for example, tend to focus on writing-based assessment instruments (such as written assignments and term papers). Based on this distinction, the notion that pedagogical mechanisms (apart from proctored assessments) are sufficient to ensure academic integrity in online MFB courses is questioned and challenged. Recommendations are given to advance the use of proctored assessments in online MFB courses through the creation of universal proctoring standards and the expansion of current and new testing center networks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.