Each major behavior science has a variety of distinct perspectives on our species' capacity for humor. Some psychological, sociological, and anthropological approaches are explained in this article. No theory accounting for or method of studying humor has gained a plurality of adherents in any of these disciplines. This article presents a social psychological analysis, emphasizing the interpersonal and intergroup functions of humor production, expression, and appreciation, with particular attention to gender-based socialization of language and its individual and social consequences. Historical and contemporary examples of women in humor are discussed, in addition to implications of feminist humor for future relations between women and men.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KlinebergO., Social Psychology, Holt, New York, pp. 190–193, 1954.
2.
JamesE. T.JamesJ. W., and BoyerP. S. (eds.), Notable American Women: 1607–1950, Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1971.
3.
RourkeC., American Humor: A Study of National Character, Doubleday Anchor, Garden City, New York, 1955.
4.
MarloweL., Getting Down to Mirth, paper presented at the Seventh National Conference on Feminist Psychology of the Association for Women in Psychology, Santa Monica, California, 1980.
5.
AbelesJ. H., Humoral Humor (Letters), The Sciences, 22: 9, p. 3, 1982.
6.
PeterL.Laughter, Ms Magazine, 11: 11, p. 88, 1983.
7.
FerrisD. R., Humor and Creativity: Research and Theory, Journal of Creative Behavior, 6: 2, pp. 75–79, 1972.
8.
LipsH. M., Women, Men and the Psychology of Power, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 119–120, 1981.
9.
GrochA. S., Generality of Response to Humor and Wit in Cartoons, Jokes, Stories and Photographs, Psychological Reports, 35, pp. 835–838, 1974.
10.
LeventhalH. and CupchikG., A Process Model of Humor Judgment, Journal of Communication, 3, pp. 190–204, 1976.
11.
HenleyN. and ThorneB. (eds.), Language and Sex, Newbury House, Rowley, Massachusetts, (passim), 1975.
12.
LevineJ., Motivation in Humor, Atherton, New York, (passim), 1969.
GoldsteinJ. H., Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 453–456, 1980.
15.
SpradleyJ. P. and MannB. J., The Cocktail Waitress, Wiley, New York, pp. 87–100, 1975.
16.
BernardJ., The Female World, Free Press, New York, Part V (passim), p. 459, 1981.
17.
TortuS., Women and Men: An Intergroup Analysis, paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Women in Psychology, Boston, Massachusetts, 1981.
18.
HackerH., Women as a Minority Group, Social Forces, 30, pp. 60–69, 1951.
19.
KaufmanG. and BlakelyM. K., Pulling Our Own Strings, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, Dear Gloria and Introduction, 1980.
20.
GoffmanE., Gender Advertisements, Harper Colophon, New York, 1979.
21.
CantorJ. R., What Is Funny to Whom?, Journal of Communication, 26: 3, pp. 164–172, 1976.
22.
FineG. A., Obscene Joking Across Cultures, Journal of Communication, 26: 3, pp. 134–140, 1976.
23.
ChapmanA. J. and GadfieldN. J., Is Sexual Humor Sexist?, Journal of Communication, 26: 3, pp. 141–153, 1976.
24.
SchutzC. E., The Phallic Fallacy — Political Potency in Feminist Humor, paper presented at The Second International Conference on Humor, Los Angeles, California, 1979.
25.
WalkerN., Wit, Sentimentality and the Image of Women in the Nineteenth Century, American Studies, 22: 2, pp. 5–22, Fall 1981.
26.
BaronR. A. and ByrneD., Exploring Social Psychology, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 230–232, 1979.
27.
Ms Magazine, p. 24, April 1982.
28.
Van KleefD., Further Antics of Ladies Against Women, Ms Magazine, p. 47, August 1982.
29.
Ms Magazine, p. 12, February 1983.
30.
AllenS., The Uses of Comedy, Journal of Creative Behavior, 6: 2, pp. 83–85, 1972.
31.
FadimanC., Humor as a Weapon, Journal of Creative Behavior, 6: 2, pp. 87–92, 1972.
