Previous studies by Bourdieu and others have shown a tendency for cultural tastes to serve as status markers that distinguish members of social classes differing in economic capital (money, income, wealth) and cultural capital (family background, education, training). However, questions remain concerning the extent to which such findings—especially those obtained over 20 years ago in France—can be meaningfully generalized to the contemporary United States. The present study explores this issue using a large-scale database that covers a broad range of cultural activities pursued by a comprehensive sample of American geodemographic clusters. The results support the Bourdieusian view by showing clear contrasts in differential cultural preferences among groups varying in income, education, and various demographic characteristics.
BlauJ. R. (1989). The shape of culture.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4.
BourdieuP. (1986). The production of belief. Contribution to an economy of symbolic goods. In CollinsR. (Eds.), Media, culture and society (pp. 131–163). London: Sage Publications.
5.
BrantlingerP. (1983). Bread & circuses.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
6.
BrysonB. (1996). “Anything but heavy metal”: Symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes. American Sociological Review, 61, 884–899.
7.
Claritas (1995). Marketing essentials: PRIZM methodology. Working Paper, Claritas, Inc.
8.
DiMaggioP. (1986). Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth-century Boston: The creation of an organizational base for high culture in America. In CollinsR. (Eds.), Media, culture and society (pp. 194–211). London: Sage Publications.
9.
DiMaggloP. (1987). Classification in art. American Sociological Review, 52, 440–455.
10.
DiMaggioP. (1992). Cultural boundaries and structural change: The extension of the high culture model to theater, opera, and the dance, 1900-1940. In LamontM. & FournierM. (Eds.), Cultivating differences (pp. 21–57). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
11.
EricksonB. H. (1996). Culture, class, and connections. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 217–251.
12.
GartmanD. (1991). Culture as class symbolization or mass reification? A critique of Bourdieu's Distinction, American Journal of Sociology, 97, 421–447.
13.
HalleD. (1993). Inside culture.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
HenryW. A.III (1994). In defense of elitism.New York: Doubleday.
15.
HolbrookM. B. (1995). An empirical approach to representing patterns of consumer tastes, nostalgia, and hierarchy in the market for cultural products. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 13, 55–71.
16.
HolbrookM. B., & HollowayD. V. (1984). Marketing strategy and the structure of aggregate, segment-specific, and differential preferences. Journal of Marketing, 48(Winter), 62–67.
17.
HolbrookM. B., & LehmannD. R. (1981). Allocation of discretionary time: Assessing complementarity among activities. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 395–406.
18.
HoltD. B. (1998). Does cultural capital structure American consumption?Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 1–25.
19.
JenkinsR. (1992). Pierre Bourdieu.London: Routledge.
20.
LamontM. (1992). Money, morals, and manners.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
21.
LamontM., & LareauA. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory, 6, 153–168.
22.
LevineL. W. (1988). Highbrow/lowbrow.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
23.
LindauerM. S. (1990). Reactions to cheap art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8, 95–110.
24.
LindauerM. S. (1991a). Comparisons between museum and mass-produced art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 11–22.
25.
LindauerM. S. (1991b). Mass-produced art: Towards a popular aesthetics. Journal of Popular Culture, 25, 57–68.
26.
MacdonaldD. (1953, ed. 1957). A theory of mass culture. In RosenbergB. & WhiteD. M. (Eds.), Mass culture (pp. 59–73). Glencoe: The Free Press.
27.
PetersonR. A. (1992). Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore. Poetics, 21, 243–258.
28.
PetersonR. A., & KernR. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61, 900–907.
29.
PetersonR. A., & SimkusA. (1992). How musical tastes mark occupational status groups. In LamontM. & FournierM. (Eds.), Cultivating differences (pp. 152–186). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
30.
RossA. (1989). No respect.New York: Routledge.
31.
SPSS (1999). SPSS base 9.0: User's guide.Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
32.
StrinatiD. (1995). An introduction to theories of popular culture.London: Routledge.
33.
TwitchellJ. B. (1992). Carnival culture.New York: Columbia University Press.
34.
WeissM. J. (2000). The clustered world.Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
35.
WinstonA. S. (1995). Simple pleasures: The psychological aesthetics of high and popular art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 13, 193–203.
36.
ZolbergV. L. (1990). Constructing a sociology of the arts.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
ZolbergV. L. (1992). Barrier or leveler? The case of the art museum. In LamontM. & FournierM. (Eds.), Cultivating differences (pp. 187–209). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
