This article discusses two conflicts occurring during the first decade of the Royal Society (1660–1670). One conflict concerned the proper method of scientific experimentation, the other the proper writing style for communicating scientific knowledge. Following the method proposed by taxonomists, language would be a vehicle for representing the order of reality in its undisturbed state. Following the method proposed by conjecturalists, language would be a means for constructing a theory and arguing for its validity. Members of the Society were divided over these crucial questions, as evident in scientific documents of the period as well as in Thomas Sprat's History of the Royal Society. Parallels to this division are present in contemporary issues in technical writing, and this article closes by discussing some implications for teaching, practice, and theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BurnettR. E., Technical Communication (2nd Edition), Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California, 1990.
2.
JonesR. F., Science and Language in England of the Mid-Seventeenth Century, in The Seventeenth Century: Studies in the History of English Thought and Literature from Bacon to Pope, JonesR. F. (ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1951.
3.
AdolphR., The Rise of Modern Prose, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, 1968.
4.
StephensJ., Francis Bacon and the Style of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1975.
5.
JonesR. F., Ancients and Moderns: A Study of the Rise of the Scientific Movement in Seventeenth-Century England, Washington University Press, St. Louis, 1961.
6.
KuhnT. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd Edition), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1971.
7.
KennyA. (ed.), Descartes' Philosophical Letters, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1970.
8.
DescartesR., Philosophical Works of Descartes, HaldaneE. and RossG. (trans.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1931.
9.
WilkinsJ., An Essay Toward a Real Character and Philosophical Language, London, 1667.
10.
SlaughterM. M., Universal Languages and Scientific Taxonomy in the Seventeenth Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.
11.
KnowlsonJ., Universal Language Schemes in England and France 1600–1800, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1975.
12.
SpratT., The History of the Royal Society of London, For the Improving of Natural Knowledge, CopeJackson I. and JonesHarold Whitmore (eds.), Washington University Studies, St. Louis, 1958.
13.
HunterM., Establishing the New Science: The Early Royal Society, Boydell, Woodbridge, 1989.
14.
BirchT., The History of the Royal Society, London, 1756, 3 vols.
15.
ScaglioneA, The Classical Theory of Composition, From its Origins to the Present Day: A Historical Survey, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1972.
16.
GageJ. T.Philosophies of Style and Their Implications for Composition, College English, 41, pp. 615–622, 1980.
17.
BazermanC., Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1988.
18.
CrollM. W., Attic Prose: Lipsius, Montaigne, Bacon, in Style, Rhetoric, and Rhythm: Essays by Morris W. Croll, Max PatrickJ. and EvansRobert O. (eds.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1966.
19.
WilliamsonG., The Senecan Amble: A Study in Prose Form from Bacon to Cowley, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1951.
20.
RescherN., Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge, State University of New York Press, Albany, 1977.
21.
WoodP. B.Methodology and Apologetics: Thomas Sprat's History of the Royal Society, British Journal for the History of Science, 13, pp. 1–26, 1980.
22.
WebsterC., The Origins of the Royal Society, History of Science, 8, 1967.
23.
JacobsJ. R., Restoration Ideologies and the Royal Society, History of Science, 18, 1980.
24.
ShapiroB.Latitudinarianism and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, Past and Present, 40, pp. 16–41, 1968.
25.
CopeJ. I., Introduction, The History of the Royal Society of London, for the Improving of Natural Knowledge, by SpratThomasCopeJ. I., and JonesH. W. (eds.), Washington University Studies, St. Louis, pp. xii–xxxii, 1958.
26.
GunningR., The Technique of Clear Writing, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1968.
27.
KennedyG. E. and MontgomeryT. T., Solving Problems Through Technical and Professional Writing, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993.
28.
AndersonP. V., Technical Writing: A Reader-Centered Approach (2nd Edition), Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Fort Worth, 1991.
29.
ToulminS., The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1956.
30.
KentT., Paralogic Rhetoric: A Theory of Communicative Interaction, Bucknell University Press, Lewisburg, 1993.
31.
WaltersFrank D., Taxonomy and the Undoing of Language: Dialogic Form in the Universal Languages of the Seventeenth Century, Style, 1, 1993 (in press).
