Public relations writing has been neglected as a research topic in professional communication. This article uses rhetorical theory from a number of fields to examine a topic of recent concern—shared, or negotiated, meaning—in relation to two very different samples of public relations writing: the public relations texts produced by political-advocacy organizations involved in the midwestern farm crisis of the 1980s and an entry from an organizational newsletter. More specifically, the article studies the role of four rhetorical elements—exophoric and intertextual references, metaphors, and narratives—in generating a shared meaning. In doing so, the article develops the thesis that narratives were particularly important to this public relations writing because they provided a comprehensive, compelling framework for belief and thus contributed greatly to the shared meaning created by writers and readers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GilsdorfJ.Business Communication: The Public Relations Connection, The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 49:3, pp. 20–22, 1986.
2.
BlylerN. R.Rhetorical Theory and Newsletter Writing, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 20:2, pp. 139–152, 1990.
3.
BuchholzW. J.The Boston Study; Analysis of a Major Metropolitan Business- and Technical-Communication Market, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 3:1, pp. 5–35.
4.
MillerC. R., A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing, College English, 40.6 pp. 610–617, 1979.
5.
BrandtD.Toward an Understanding of Context in Composition, Written Communication, 3:2, pp. 139–157, 1986.
6.
PorterJ. E.Intertextuality and the Discourse Community, Rhetoric Review, 5:1, pp. 34–47, 1986.
7.
ClarkG., Dialogue, Dialect, and Conversation. A Social Perspective on the Function of Writing, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, 1990.
8.
BruffeeK. A.Social Construction, Language, and the Authority of Knowledge: A Bibliographic Essay, College English, 48:8, pp. 773–790, 1986.
9.
DasenbrockR. W.Do We Write the Text We Read, College English, 53:1, pp. 7–18, 1991.
10.
KentT., Interpretation and Triangulation: A Davidsonian Critique of Reader-Oriented Literary Theory, in Redrawing the Lines: Analytic Philosophy, Deconstruction, and Literary Theory, DasenbrockR. W. (ed.), Penn State University Press, College Station, forthcoming.
11.
NelsonJ. S.MegillA., and McCloskeyD. N. (eds.), The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1987.
12.
SimonsH. (ed.), Rhetoric in the Human Sciences, Sage, Newbury Park, California, 1989.
13.
FreedR. C. and BroadheadG. J.Discourse Communities, Sacred Texts, and Institutional Norms, College Composition and Communication, 38:2, pp. 154–165, 1987.
14.
KentT., Ethnography and Objectivity, in Paralogic Rhetoric: A Theory of Communicative Interaction, Bucknell University Press, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, forthcoming.
15.
BrowneW. P., Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, 1988.
16.
BrandtD., Text and Context: How Writers Come to Mean, in Functional Approaches to Writing, CoutureB. (ed.), Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, pp. 93–107, 1986.
17.
de BeaugrandeR-A and DressierW., Introduction to Text Linguistics, Longman, New York, 1981.
18.
Iowa Farm Unity CoalitionUncertainty Looms over Final Provisions of 1985 Farm Bill, Iowa Farm Unity News, 2:4, p. 1, 1986.
19.
Center for Rural Affairs, What is Appropriate Alternative Agriculture?Center for Rural Affairs, Walthill, Nebraska, n.d.
20.
OrtonyA.Why Metaphors are Necessary and not just Nice, Educational Theory, 25, pp. 25–53, 1975.
21.
Prairiefire Rural Action, Inc., Family Farms in Crisis, Prairiefire Rural Action, Inc., Des Moines, Iowa, 1986.
22.
HuckinT. N., A Cognitive Approach to Readability, in New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication, AndersonP. V.BrockmannR. J., and MillerC. R. (eds.), Baywood, Amityville, New York, pp. 90–108, 1983.
23.
PrinceG., Introduction, in Narratology. The Form and Function of Narrative, Morton, New York, pp. 1–5, 1982.
24.
MinkL. O., Narrative Form as a Cognitive Instrument, in The Writing of History: Literary Form and Historical Understanding, CanaryR. H. and KoziskiH. (eds.), University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 129–149, 1978.
25.
WhiteH.The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality, Critical Inquiry, 7:1, pp. 5–27, 1980.
26.
GergenK. J. and GergenM. M., Narratives of the Self, in Studies in Social Identity, SarbinT. R. and ScheibeK. E. (eds.), Praeger, New York, pp. 254–273, 1983.
27.
FryeN., Anatomy of Criticism, Four Essays, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1971.
28.
FisherW. R.Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm: The Case of Public Moral Argument, Communication Monographs, 51:1, pp. 1–22, 1984.
29.
BennettW. L. and EdelmanM.Toward a New Political Narrative, Journal of Communication, 35:4, pp. 156–171, 1983.
30.
BormannE. G.Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: The Rhetorical Criticism of Social Reality, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58:4, pp. 396–407, 1972.
31.
BormannE. G.Symbolic Convergence Theory: A Communication Formulation, Journal of Communication, 35:4, pp. 128–138, 1985.
32.
BarleyS. R.Semiotics and the Study of Occupational and Organizational Cultures, Administrative Quarterly, 28, pp. 383–413, 1983.
33.
North American Farm Alliance, North American Farm Alliance. Unity. Prosperity. Justice, North American Farm Alliance, Ames, Iowa, n.d.
34.
National Catholic Rural Life, Ownership. Why are So Many Farm Families Going Broke?National Catholic Rural Life Conference, Des Moines, Iowa, n.d.
35.
Illinois South ProjectPowerful Partners Plot Against Harkin Bill, Farm Advocate Alert, 2:5, p. 3, 1987.
36.
BlylerL. L. and MatsuokaS., Polymer Coatings for Glass Fibers, Bell Laboratories Record, pp. 315–319, December 1979.
37.
FreedR. C., Postmodernist Practice: Perspectives and Prospects, in Professional Communication: The Social Perspective, BlylerN. R. and ThrallsC. (eds.), Sage, Newbury Park, California, forthcoming.
38.
BlylerN. R., co-editor (with Charlotte Thralls), Professional Communication: The Social Perspective, Sage Publishing, forthcoming.
39.
BlylerN. R., “Reading Theory and Persuasive Business Communications: Guidelines for Writers,”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, forthcoming.
40.
BlylerN. R., “Rhetorical Theory and Newsletter Writing,”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 20:2, pp. 139–152, 1990.
41.
BlylerN. R., “Purpose and Composition Theory: Issues in the Research,”Journal of Advanced Composition, 9:1, pp. 97–111, 1989.
