A survey of residents in the vicinity of the Three Mile Island nuclear generating facility four years after the accident examined level of interest in cancer detection and treatment, radiation monitoring, and epidemiology of cancer as a function of degree of ongoing worry, perceived control and demographic variables. Interest in information was found to be related to worry for all three topics, indicating that residents who had higher degrees of worry were more interested in seeking information than avoiding it. Control expectancy was related to interest in information about epidemiological distribution of cancer. Implications for the dissemination of information in the aftermath of a disaster are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrometE., Three Mile Island: Mental Health Findings, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 1980.
2.
FlynnC. B. and ChalmersJ. A., The Social and Economic Effects of the Accident at Three Mile Island (prepared for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as Document NUREG/CR-1215), Mountain West Research, Tempe, Arizona, 1979.
3.
HoutsP.MillerR.TokuhataG., and HamK., Health Related Behavioral Impact of the Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident, report submitted to the TMI Advisory Panel on Health Related Studies of the Pennsylvania Department of Health, November 1980.
4.
HoutsP. S. and GoldhaberN. K., Psychological and Social Effects on the Population Surrounding Three Mile Island After the Nuclear Accident, in Energy, Environment and the Economy, MajumdarS. (ed.), Pennsylvania Academy of Science, 1981.
5.
DohrenwendB. P.DohrenwendB. S.KaslS. V., and WarheitG. J., Report of the Task Force on Behavioral Effects of the President's Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island, Washington, D.C., 1979.
6.
SeoT. and ImanakaT., Radioactive Nobel Gas Released from the TMI Accident, Kaqaka-52, pp. 42–52, January 1982.
7.
BeyeaJ., A Review of Dose Assessments at TMI and Recommendations for Future Research, report completed for TMI Public Health Fund, Philadelphia, August, 1984.
8.
MohlholtB., Summary of Acute Symptoms by TMI Area Residents During Accident, Proceedings of the Workshop on Three Mile Island Dosimetry, Philadelphia Three Mile Island Public Health Fund, A109-A111, 1985.
9.
BaumA.GatchelR., and SchaefferM., Emotion, Behavioral and Physiological Effects of Chronic Stress at Three Mile Island, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, pp. 656–672, 1983.
10.
EpsteinS. and RoupenianA., Heart Rate and Skin Conductance During Experimentally Induced Anxiety: The Effect of Uncertainty About Receiving Noxious Stimulus, The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, pp. 20–28, 1970.
11.
DeaneG. E., Cardiac Activity During Experimentally Induced Anxiety, Psychophysiology, 6, pp. 17–30, 1969.
12.
ElliottG. R., Effects of Uncertainty About the Nature and Advent of a Noxious Stimulus: “Shock” Upon Heart Rate, The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, pp. 353–356, 1966.
13.
FolkmanS. and LazarusR. S., An Analysis of Coping in a Middle-aged Community Sample, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, pp. 219–239, 1980.
14.
LazarusR. S., Psychological Stress and the Coping Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966.
15.
CollinsD. L.BaumA., and SingerJ. E., Coping with Chronic Stress at Three Mile Island: Psychological and Biochemical Evidence, Health Psychology, 2, pp. 149–166, 1983.
16.
Prince-EmburyS. and RooneyJ. F., Beliefs and Worries of TMI Area Residents, ERIC/Social Science Information Clearinghouse, Document #SO 016 656, 1985.
17.
AverillJ. R.O'BrienL., and DeWittG. W., The Influence of Response Effectiveness on the Preference for Warning and on physiological Stress Reactions, Journal of Personality, 45, pp. 396–418, 1977.
18.
AverillJ. R. and RosennM., Vigilant and Nonvigilant Coping, Strategies and Psycho-physiological Stress Reactions During the Anticipation of an Electric Shock, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, pp. 128–141, 1972.
19.
BerlyneD. E., Conflict Arousal and Curiosity, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960.
20.
Calvert-BoyanowskyJ. and LeventhalH., The Role of Information in Attenuating Behavioral Responses to Stress: A Reinterpretation of the Misattribution Phenomenon, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, pp. 214–221, 1960.
21.
EpsteinS., Expectancy and Magnitude of Reaction to a Noxious Use, Psychophysiology, 10, pp. 100–107, 1973.
22.
MillerS. M., Coping with Impending Stress: Psychophysiological and Cognitive Correlates of Choice, Psychophysiology, 16, pp. 572–581, 1979.
23.
MillerS. M., When Is a Little Information a Dangerous Thing?Coping with Stressful Events by Monitoring Blunting, Coping and Health Proceedings of a NATO Conference, Plenum Press, New York, 1980.
24.
MillerS. M., Why Having Control Reduced Stress: If I Can Stop the Roller Coaster, I Don't Want to Get Off, in Human Helplessness Theory and Applications, GarberJ. and SeligmanM. (eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1980.
25.
MillerS. M., Predictability and Human Stress: Toward a Clarification of Evidence and Theory, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, pp. 203–255, 1981.
26.
MillerS. M. and ManganC. E., Interacting Effects of Information and Coping Style in Adapting to Gynecologic Stress: Should the Doctor Tell All?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45: 1, pp. 223–236, 1983.
27.
MonatA.AverillJ. R., and LazarusR. S., Anticipatory Stress and Coping Reactions Under Various Conditions of Uncertainty, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, pp. 237–252, 1972.
28.
MonatA., Temporal Uncertainty, Anticipation Time, and Cognitive Coping Under Threat, Journal of Human Stress, 2, pp. 32–43, 1976.
29.
SorensenJ. H., Knowing How to Behave Under the Threat of Disaster: Can It Be Explained?Environment and Behavior, 15: 4, pp. 438–457, 1983.
30.
LanzettaJ. J. and DriscollJ. M., Preference for Information about an Uncertain but Unavoidable Outcome, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, pp. 96–102, 1966.
31.
PervinL. A., The Need to Predict and Control Under Conditions of Threat, Journal of Personality, 31, pp. 570–587, 1963.
32.
SokolovE. N., Perception and the Conditioned Reflex, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1963.
33.
RothbartM. and MellingerM., Attention and Responsivity to Remote Dangers — Laboratory Simulation for Assessing Reactions to Threatening Events, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, p. 132, 1972.
34.
TokuhataG. K. and DigonE., Cancer Mortality and Morbidity (Incidence) Around TMI, unpublished report, Department of Epidemiology Research, Pennsylvania Department of Health, September 1985.
35.
PharesE. J., Perceived Control, in Introduction to Personality, Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company, Columbus, p. 510, 1984.
36.
StricklandB. R., Internal-external Expectancies of Health-related Behaviors, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, pp. 1192–1211, 1978.
37.
Simpson-HousleyP. and BradshawP., Personality and the Perception of Earthquake Hazard, Australian Geographical Studies, 16, pp. 65–72, 1978.
38.
DavidsonL. M.BaumA., and CollinsD. L., Stress and Control Related Problems at Three Mile Island, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, pp. 349–359, 1982.
39.
BaumA. and DavidsonM., A Suggested Framework for Studying Factors that Contribute to Trauma in Disaster, in Disasters and Mental Health: Selected Contemporary Perspectives, SowderB. (ed.), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland, pp. 29–40, 1985.
40.
RotterJ. B., Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement, Psychological Monographs, 80, (1, Whole No. 609), 1966.
