Employers must frequently choose between hiring a professional writer or a technician to communicate high technology to the lay public. The professional writer may well be the better choice. Writers can develop their technical writing skills to meet this challenge by practicing Technical Communication Competency, by standardizing technical objectives, by learning to write readable and interesting technical documents, and by requesting diagrams that clearly show functions and relationships. At the same time, writers must keep up with the rapid changes in technology if they want to continue providing a valuable link between the lay public and this technology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnesonD. J., The Official Computer Hater's Handbook, Dell Publishing Co., New York, 1983.
2.
BrusawC. T., Dismantling the Tower of Babel in Computer Documentation, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 10:2, pp. 133–139, 1980.
3.
SangerD. E., Technical Writers Can Write Their Own Ticket, New York Times, Employment Outlook Section, p. 22, March 27, 1983.
4.
TveitoS., Why Are Today's Technical Descriptions Still “A Journey Through the Unknown?,”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 12:2, pp. 161–166, 1982.
5.
StrawS. B., Assessment and Evaluation in Written Composition: A Commonsense Perspective, in Research in the Language Arts, FroeseV. and StrawS. B. (eds.), University Park Press, Maryland, pp. 181–202, 1981.
6.
BushD., Content Editing, An Opportunity for Growth, Technical Communication, pp. 15–18, 1981.
7.
BalkW. L., A New Technical Writer?, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 2:4, pp. 289–294, 1972.
8.
KellyR. S., Translating Jabberwocky! From Teaching English to Technical Writing, Technical Writing Teacher, 9:3, pp. 147–149, 1982.
FlowerL. and HayesJ. R., The Cognition of Discovery: Defining a Rhetorical Problem, College Composition and Communication, 31, pp. 21–32, 1980.
11.
BrandtD. R. and PowersW. G., An Approach to Developing Communicative Competence in Scientific and Technical Communicators, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 10:3, pp. 213–221, 1980.
12.
JohnsonP. H.GarrardJ., and HausmanW., A Method for Translating Technical to Nontechnical Prose, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 12:3, pp. 191–200, 1982.
13.
McCaskeyD. S., Technical Writing: The Importance of Reader Interest, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 3:3, pp. 217–221, 1973.
14.
SelzerJ., What Constitutes a “Readable” Technical Style?, in New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication, AndersonP. V. (eds.), Baywood Publishing Co., Farmingdale, New York, 1983.
15.
ShoreJ. N., Professional Personality of the Technical Communicator, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 2:4, pp. 269–279, 1972.
