In this study, the researcher developed a computer-based learning (CBL) courseware that presented the abstract concept with a concrete analogy through five different versions: 1) static graphic group; 2) static graphic with full audio group; 3) animation group; 4) animation with cued audio group; and 5) animation with full audio group. The participants were 316 college students and were divided into three ability levels based on their IQ reasoning score. Research results found that either static graphics without audio narration or animation with full audio can help students understand the abstract concepts better than either static graphics with full audio or animation alone groups. Animation with full audio has the best effect on long term retention. Students' IQ reasoning ability significantly helps them build associations between abstract and concrete knowledge more accurately and efficiently. The results of this study will contribute to the application of using multimedia CBL in teaching abstract concepts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DedeC. J., The Future of Multimedia: Bridging to Virtual Worlds, Educational Technology, 32: 5, pp. 54–60, 1992.
2.
MannB. L., Focusing Attention with Temporal Sound, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27: 4, pp. 402–424, 1995.
3.
LaiS. L., The Effects of Visual Display on Analogies Using Computer-Based Learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25: 2, pp. 151–160, 1998.
4.
LaiS. L., Influence of Audio-Visual Presentations on Learning Abstract Concept, International Journal of Instructional Media, 27: 2, pp. 199–206, 2000.
5.
PaivioA., Imagery and Verbal Processes, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1979.
6.
PaivioA., Mental Representation: A Dual Coding Approach, Oxford University Press, New York, 1990.
7.
PaivioA., Mental Imagery in Associative Learning and Memory, Psychological Review, 76, pp. 241–263, 1969.
8.
PaivioA., The Empirical Case for Dual Coding, in Imagery, Memory and Cognition-Essays in Honor of Allan Paivio, YuilleJ. C. (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1983.
9.
ChanLinL. J. and ChanK. C., Computer Graphics and Metaphorical Elaboration for Learning Science Concepts, paper presented at the Association for Educational Communication and Technology conference, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 392 390, 1996.
10.
KatzA. N. and PaivioA., Imagery Variables in Concept Identification, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, pp. 284–293, 1975.
11.
McDanielM. A. and DonnellyC. M., Learning with Analogy and Elaborate Interrogation, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88: 3, pp. 508–519, 1996.
12.
RieberL. P., Computers, Graphics, & Learning. Wm. C. Brown Communications Inc., Dubuque, Lousiana, 1994.
13.
MayerR. E. and AndersonR. B., The Instructive Animation: Helping Students Build Connections Between Words and Pictures in Multimedia Learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84: 4, pp. 444–452, 1992.
14.
SchnotzW. and GrzondzielH., Knowledge Acquisition with Static and Animated Pictures in Computer-Based Learning, paper presented at the American Educational Research Association conference, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 401 878, 1996.
15.
MilheimW. D., How to Use Animation in Computer Assisted Learning, British Journal of Educational Technology, 24: 3, pp. 171–178, 1993.
16.
RieberL. P., Animation as A Distracter to Learning, International Journal of Instructional Media, 23: 1, pp. 53–57, 1996.
17.
ReedS. K., Effect of Computer Graphics on Improving Estimates to Algebra Word Problems, Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, pp. 258–298, 1985.
18.
RieberL. P., The Effects of Computer Animated Elaboration Strategies and Practice on Factual and Application Learning in An Elementary Science Lesson, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54, pp. 431–444, 1989.
19.
PaivioA., Dual Coding Theory: Retrospect and Current Status, Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45: 3, pp. 255–287, 1991.
20.
CraikF. I. M. and LockhartR. S., Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, pp. 671–684, 1972.
21.
ParkO., Visual Displays and Contextual Presentations in Computer-Based Instruction, Educational Technology Research and Development, 46: 3, pp. 37–50, 1998.
22.
BrennerM. E.MayerR. E.MoseleyB.BrarT.DuranR.ReedB. S., and WebbD., Learning by Understanding: The Role of Multiple Representations in Learning Algebra, American Educational Research Journal, 34: 3, pp. 663–689, 1997.
23.
MayerR. E.BoveW.BrymanA.MarsR., and TapangeoL., When Less Is More: Meaningful Learning from Visual and Verbal Summaries of Science Textbook Lessons, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88: 1, pp. 64–73, 1996.
24.
BaggettP., Role of Temporal Overlap of Visual and Auditory Material in Forming Dual Media Associations, Journal of Educational Psychology, 76: 3, pp. 408–417, 1984.
25.
JaspersF., The Relationship of Sound-Image, International Journal of Instructional Media, 18: 2, pp. 161–174, 1991.
26.
ClementC. A. and YanowitzK., Using Analogy to Model Causal Mechanisms in a Narrative Text, paper presented at the American Educational Research Association conference, Montreal, Canada, April, 1999.
27.
AltenS. R., Audio in Media, Wadsworth, Belmont, California, 1990.
28.
DanielsD., Audio-Vision: Audio-Visual Interaction in Desktop Multimedia, paper presented at the International Visual Literacy Association conference, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 380 063, 1995.
29.
GrimesT., Audio-Video Correspondence and Its Role in Attention and Memory, Educational Technology Research & Development, 38, pp. 15–25, 1990.
30.
JaspersF., Speech and Voice in Instructional Programs, Educational Media International, 31: 2, pp. 114–122, 1994.
31.
LangA., Defining Audio/Video Redundancy from a Limited-Capacity Information Processing Perspective, Communication Research, 22: 1, pp. 86–115, 1995.
32.
BarronA. E. and AtkinsD., Audio Instruction in Multimedia Education: Is Textual Redundancy Important?Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3: 3/4, pp. 259–306, 1994.
33.
NugentG. G., Pictures, Audio, and Print: Symbolic Representation and Effect on Learning, Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 30: 3, pp. 163–174, 1982.
34.
EdwardsonM.GroomsD., and PringleP., Visualization and TV News Information Gain. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 20, pp. 373–380, 1976.
35.
GunterB., Poor Reception: Misunderstanding and Forgetting Broadcast News, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1987.
36.
JohnstonJ., Electronic Learning: From Audiotape to Videotape, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1987.
37.
HobanC. F. and Van OrmerE. B., Instructional Film Research 1918–1950, Arno Press & The New York Times, New York, 1970.
38.
BartonE. A. and DwyerF. M., The Effect of Audio Redundancy on Students' Ability to Profit from Printed-Verbal/Visualized Instruction, International Journal of Instructional Media, 14, pp. 93–98, 1987.
39.
CateW. M., Making the Most of Imagery: Theoretical Issues in Selecting Metaphorical Images, paper presented at the American Educational Research Association conference, Georgia, April, 1993.
40.
LaiS. L. and RepmanJ., The Effects of Analogies and Mathematics Ability on Students' Programming Learning Using Computer-Based Learning, International Journal of Instructional Media, 23: 4, pp. 335–364, 1996.
41.
AlesandriniK. L., A Look at Computer Graphics, The Computing Teacher, 12: 5, pp. 23–25, 1985.
42.
FlemingM., Designing Pictorial/Verbal Instruction: Some Speculative Extensions from Research to Practice, in The Psychology of Illustration: Vol. 2. Instructional Issues, WillowsD. M. and HoughtonH. A. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 137–157, 1987.
43.
HsiaH. J., Intelligence in Auditory, Visual, and Audiovisual Information Processing, AV Communication Review, 17, pp. 272–282, 1969.
44.
LuJ. Y. and HoZ. G., IQ Reasoning Ability for College Students, Chinese Behavior Science, Taiwan, 1986.
