The present paper addresses the question of on-site supportive services in retirement housing facilities for the well-elderly. Six hundred residents were interviewed, 100 at each of six widely varied sites in California: retirement hotel, urban high-rise apartments, life-care home, and three retirement villages. Data were also collected on 600 matched controls in age-integrated housing. Questions were asked pertaining to caring for health needs, desire for counseling services, and expected support in crises. Results showed for the most part a good match between personal needs and environmental provisions. However, at one site considerable insecurity was expressed with regard to medical provisions and support in crises, and a desire was expressed for counseling services. There was no evidence of an erosion of independence at the sites where services are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HamovitchM. B., Social and psychological factors in adjustment in a retirement village. In CarpF. M. (Ed.), The retirement process: Report of a conference, December 1966. PHS Publication No. 1778, USGPO, Washington, 1968.
2.
KleemeierR. W., Attitudes toward special settings for the aged. In WilliamsR. H.TibbittsC., and DonahueW. (Eds.), Processes of aging, Vol. II. New York: Atherton Press, 1963.
3.
RosowI., Retirement housing and social integration. In TibbittsC. and DonahueW. (Eds.), Social and psychological aspects of aging. New York: Columbia University Press, 1962.
4.
White House Conference on Aging. Toward a National Policy on Aging. Final Report, Volume II. Washington: USGPO, 1973, 0-468-218.
5.
ShermanS. R., The choice of retirement housing among the well-elderly. Aging and Human Development, 1971, 2, 118–138.
6.
LawtonM. P., Supportive services in the context of the housing environment. The Gerontologist, 1969, 9, 15–19.
7.
WalkleyR. P.MangumW. P.Jr.ShermanS. R.DoddsS. and WilnerD. M., Retirement housing in California. Berkeley: Diablo Press, 1966.
8.
White House Conference on Aging. Housing the Elderly: Background and Issues. Washington: USGPO, 5247–0025, 1971.
9.
DonahueW., Impact of living arrangements on ego development in the elderly. In CarpF. M. (ed.), Patterns of housing of middle-aged and older people. Washington, D.C.: USGPO, 1966.
10.
LawtonM. P. and NahemowL., Ecology and the aging process. In EisdorferC. and LawtonM. P. (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging. Washington: American Psychological Association, 1973.
11.
WilnerD. M. and WalkleyR. P., Some special problems and alternatives in housing for older persons. In McKinneyJ. C. and deVyverF. T. (Eds.), Aging and social policy. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
12.
AtchleyR. C. (Ed.), Ohio's older people. Prepared under contract for the Division of Administration on Aging, Department of Mental Hygiene and Correction, by the Scripps Foundation for Research in Population Problems, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, 1972.
13.
BarkerM. B., California Retirement Communities Special Report No. 2. Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics, Institute of Urban and Regional Development. Berkeley: University of California, 1966.
14.
KaplanJ., Gerontology in 21st century. Presented at meeting of hospital coordinators of geriatric services, New York State Department of Mental Hygiene, Albany, November 1972.
15.
LawtonM. P. (Ed.), Housing. International research and education in social gerontology: Goals and strategies. The Gerontologist, 1972, 12, 3–10.
16.
CarpF. M., A future for the aged: Victoria plaza and its residents. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1966.
17.
ShanasE.TownsendP.WedderburnD.FriisH.MilhøjP. and StehouwerJ., Old people in three industrial societies. New York: Atherton Press, 1968.
18.
BeattieW. M.Jr., Responsibility of the long-term facility to the long-term patient. Hospitals, 38, 1964.
19.
HavighurstR. J. (Ed.), The status of research in applied social gerontology. The Gerontologist, 1969, 9, No. 4, entire issue.
20.
PinkertonT. C., Site visits to six retirement housing facilities. University of California, Los Angeles, School of Public Health, 1968.
21.
ShermanS. R., Satisfaction with retirement housing: Attitudes, recommendations and moves. Aging and Human Development, 3, 1972, 339–366.
22.
CavanR. S.BurgessE. W.HavighurstR. J. and GoldhamerH., Personal adjustment in old age. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1949.
23.
KutnerB.FanshelD.TogoA. M. and LangerT. S., Five hundred over sixty. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1956.
24.
NeugartenB. L.HavighurstR. J. and TobinS. S., The measurement of life satisfaction. Journal of Gerontology, 1961, 16, 134–143.
25.
ShermanS. R., Housing environment for the well-elderly: Scope and impact. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, August, 1973, Montreal.
