Either before or after being interviewed for a volunteer position, a young or old protagonist (i.e., target) gave an excuse for forgetting. Study participants (i.e., perceivers) had a higher opinion of the target's memory, were more confident in the target's capability of performing memory-related tasks, and attributed the target's memory failures more to bad luck when the excuse was given after (damage-control strategy) rather than before (self-handicapping strategy) the interview. Moreover, the excuse given before the interview had no significant effect on perceivers' judgments when compared with data from an earlier study in which the target gave no excuse for forgetting. The present findings suggest that a damage-control strategy can ameliorate negative capability impressions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bieman-CoplandS., & RyanE. B. (1996). At my age my forgettery is better than my memory. An intergenerational analysis of age excuse behavior. Presented at the Third International Conference on Communication, Aging, and Health, May, 1996, Kansas City, Missouri.
2.
CavanaughJ. D.GradyJ. G., & PerlmutterM. (1983). Forgetting and use of memory aids in 20 and 70 year olds' everyday life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 17, 113–122.
3.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
CrawfordM.HerrmannD. J.HoldsworthM. J.RandallE. P., & RobbinsD. (1989). Gender and beliefs about memory. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 391–401.
5.
ErberJ. T.CaiolaM. A., & PupoF. A. (1994). Age and forgetfulness: Managing perceivers' impressions of targets' capability. Psychology and Aging, 9, 554–561.
6.
ErberJ. T.EtheartM. E., & SzuchmanL. T. (1992). Age and forgetfulness: Perceivers' impressions of targets' capability. Psychology and Aging, 7, 479–483.
7.
ErberJ. T., & PragerI. G. (1997). Age and forgetfulness: Absolute versus comparison decisions about capability. Experimental Aging Research, 23, 355–367.
8.
ErberJ. T.PragerI. G.WilliamsM., & CaiolaM. A. (1996). Age and forgetfulness: Confidence in ability and attribution for memory failures. Psychology and Aging, 11, 310–315.
9.
ErberJ. T., & RothbergS. T. (1991). Here's looking at you: The relative effect of age and attractiveness on judgments about memory failure. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, P116–P123.
10.
ErberJ. T.SzuchmanL. T., & RothbergS. T. (1990a). Everyday memory failure: Age differences in appraisal and attribution. Psychology and Aging, 5, 236–241.
11.
ErberJ. T.SzuchmanL. T., & RothbergS. T. (1990b). Age, gender, and individual differences in memory failure appraisal. Psychology and Aging, 5, 600–603.
12.
Florida Department of Criminal Law Enforcement (1995). Uniform crime reports, State of Florida.Tallahassee, Florida.
13.
GentryM., & HerrmannD. J. (1990). Memory contrivances in everyday life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 241–253.
14.
HigginsR. L. (1990). Self-handicapping: Historical roots and contemporary branches. In HigginsR. L.SnyderC. R., & BerglasS. (Eds.), Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn't (pp. 1–35). New York: Plenum Press.
15.
JacksonL. A.SullivanL. A., & HodgeC. N. (1993). Stereotype effects on attribution, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 69–84.
16.
KolditzT. A., & ArkinR. M. (1982). An impression management interpretation of the self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 492–502.
17.
ParrW. V., & SiegertR. (1993). Adults' conceptions of everyday memory failures in others: Factors that mediate the effects of target age. Psychology and Aging, 8, 599–605.
18.
RyanE. B. (1992). Beliefs about memory changes across the adult life span. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47, P41–P46.
19.
SchlenkerB. R., & LearyM. R. (1982). Audiences' reactions to self-enhancing, self-denigrating, and accurate self-presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 89–104.
20.
SchlenkerB. R., & WeigoldM. F. (1992). Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. In RosenzweigM. R. & PorterL. W. (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, 43, (pp. 133–168). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc.
21.
ShipleyW. C. (1940). A self-administering scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. The Journal of Psychology, 9, 371–377.
22.
SmithA. D. (1996). Memory. In BirrenJ. E. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gerontology: Age, aging, and the aged, Volume 2, (pp. 107–117). New York: Academic Press.
23.
SnyderC. R., & HigginsR. L. (1988). Excuses: Their effective role in the negotiation of reality. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 23–35.
24.
SquireL. R. (1987). Memory and brain.New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
WeinerB.AmirkhanJ.FolkesV. S., & VeretteJ. A. (1987). An attributional analysis of excuse giving: Studies of a naive theory of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 316–324.
26.
WeinerB.Figueroa-MunozA., & KakiharaC. (1991). The goals of excuses and communication strategies related to causal perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 4–13.
