Well-selected metaphoric terminology can reduce the fear and ignorance that often dishearten first-time computer users and can help them grasp new concepts and procedures. Many people are amused by terms such as bit, byte, and mouse and are enlightened by terms such as menu and wild card. Some users of computers, however, are offended by the metaphoric terminology that is commonly used in writing about computers and computing. They bridle at words like memory and intelligence applied to computing machinery. They are annoyed by casual uses of interface and parameter or puzzled by words like spool, boot, and argument. With the concept of usability as their guiding principle, writers in the computer industry can assess the appropriateness of metaphoric terminology by applying seven criteria: 1) Is a metaphoric term needed? 2) Is the old word familiar? 3) Is the metaphoric relation close? 4) Is the usage of the word consistent? 5) Is the metaphoric word brief? 6) Is the metaphoric usage acceptable? 7) Is the metaphoric word memorable?
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WrightP., Usability: The Criterion for Designing Written Information, Processing Visible Language, 2, KolersP. A. (eds.), Plenum Publishing, New York, 1980.
2.
WrightP., Prerequisites of Writing for Computer Users, a report based on the Keynote Address at the second annual conference on Writing for the Computer Industry, Plymouth State College, Plymouth, NH, June 15, 1985.
3.
ChisholmR. M., New Metaphors for Understanding the New Machines: A Workshop of Selecting Figurative Terminology in Writing for the Computer Industry, a paper presented at the fourth annual conference of SIGDOC of ACM (Special Interest Group on System Documentation of the Association for Computer Machinery), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, June 20, 1985.
BlackM., Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1962.
6.
TurbayneC. M., The Myth of Metaphor, Revised Edition, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, 1970.
7.
BarnhartC. (ed.), The Barnhart Dictionary of New English Since 1963, Barnhart/Harper & Row, Publishers, New York, 1973.
8.
PorushD. H., What's a Metaphor For?: A Prolegomena to Future Study of the Uses of Metaphor in Technical Writing, Troy, New York, May 26, 1983.
9.
ColbyJ., Models for Technical Communicators: Figures of Speech, Technical Communication, Third Quarter, p. 64, 1985.
10.
GermanC. J. and SoderstonC., Empirical Evidence that Analogy Aids Recall in Computer Documentation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, (Typescript), no date.
11.
BartelR., Metaphors and Symbols: Forays into Language, National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, 1983.
12.
BolterJ. D., Turing's Man: Western Culture in the Computer Age, The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1984.
13.
CarbonellJ. C., Metaphor: An Inescapable Phenomenon in Natural-Language Comprehension, in Strategies for Natural Language Processing, LehnertW. G. and RingleM. H. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 415–434, 1982.
14.
GowersE.Sir., The Complete Plain Words, Revised by FraserBruceSir, Penguin Books, New York, 1977.
15.
HoneckR. P. and HoffmanR. F. (eds.), Cognition and Figurative Language, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1980.
16.
LakoffG. and JohnsonM., Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980.
17.
PercyW., Metaphor as Mistake, reprinted in Reclaiming the Imagination: Perspectives for Writers and Teachers of Writing, BerthoffA. E. (ed.), Boynton/Cook, Publishers, Inc., Upper Montclair, NJ, pp. 132–144, 1984. Originally published in The Message in the Bottle. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, Inc., 1958, 1975.
18.
HarrisJ. S., The Naming of Parts: An Examination of the Origins of Technical and Scientific Vocabulary, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 14:3, pp. 183–191, 1984.
19.
OlsenM., Terminology in the Computer Industry: Wading Through the Slough of Despond, Proceedings of the 31st International Technical Communication Conference, April 29–May 2, 1984, Seattle, Washington. Washington, D.C.: Society for Technical Communication, 1984.
20.
WebsterS. P., Computer Terminology: What's it Doing to Us? paper presented at the second conference on Writing for the Computer Industry, June 15, 1985, Plymouth State College, Plymouth, NH. Photocopied.
21.
WeinbergG., The Psychology of Computer Programming, Computer Science Series, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 1971.
22.
LewisC. S., Bluspels and Flalansferes: A Semantic Nightmare in Rehabilitations and Other Essays, LewisC. S. (ed.), Oxford University Press, London, pp. 133–158, 1939.
23.
RichardsI. A., The Philosophy of Rhetoric, Oxford University Press, New York, 1936.
24.
ClantonC., The Future of Metaphor in Man-Computer Systems, BYTE, 8:12, pp. 263–280, December 1983.
25.
MurryJ. M., The Problem of Style, Oxford University Press, London, 1922, 1960.
26.
UptonA., Design for Thinking: A First Book of Semantics, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1941, 1961.
27.
ChisholmR., Technical Terminology and the Nature of Metaphor, paper presented at the annual fall conference of the Northern New England Philosophy Association, November 8–9, 1985, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, Typescript.
28.
HawkesT., Metaphor, The Critical Idiom, JumpJohn D., General Editor, Methuen & Co. Ltd., London, 1972.
29.
BurkeK., A Grammar of Motives, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1969, 1945.
30.
QuinnJ., Hopefully, They Will Shut Up, Reprinted in Gary Goshgarian, Exploring Language, 4th Edition, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, pp. 30–32, 1986.
31.
WordsworthW., Preface to the Second Edition of “Lyrical Ballads,” 1800, Selected Poetry, Van DorenMark (ed.), The Modern Library, New York, pp. 675–698, 1950.
32.
Oxford Dictionary of Computing, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 42, 1983.
33.
RichardsI. A., Interpretation in Teaching, Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York, 1938.
34.
LanhamR. A., Analyzing Prose, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1983.
35.
MenckenH. L., The American Language, 4th Edition, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1936, 1960.
36.
KirkmanJ., That's Not Writing, That's Typing, Keynote Address at the Conference on Writing for the Computer Industry, Plymouth State College, Plymouth, NH, June 1984.
37.
HallD., Writing Well, reprinted in GoshgarianGary, Exploring Language, Little Brown and Company, Boston, p. 453, 1983.
