New criteria for the design of liberal arts programs are formulated. These criteria concern the relationships among liberal arts content, process, and delivery system. The central role of process in time-variable educational systems is stressed. Crucial questions concerning the concept of purpose in the design of a liberal arts experience are raised.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BellD., The reforming of general education, Columbia University Press, 1966.
2.
WhiteheadA. N., The aims of education, Macmillan Co., New York, 1930.
3.
LevineA. and NeingartJ., Reform of undergraduate education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1973.
4.
Cameigie Commission, Less time, more options, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971.
5.
ArangurenJ. L., Human communication, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.
6.
DeweyJ., Experience and education, Macmillan Co., New York, 1965.
7.
MeadowsD., Limits to growth, Potomac Associates, Washington, D.C., 1972.
8.
MayhewL. and FordP., Changing the curriculum, Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco. 1971.
9.
KeetonM. T., Models and Mavericks, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971.
10.
FordF.MetzgerW., Rights and responsibilities, Daedalus, 1970.
