With elderly people becoming an ever larger part of our society, the usability of modern technical products for these people is becoming an ever more important issue. Instructions that optimally fit the needs of this elderly audience could enhance the usability of the products they belong to. The study described in this article is aimed at an investigation of this gerontological research literature to find out what is already known about age deficiencies in cognitive processes which might adversely influence instructional text processing. On the basis of the findings from this research, tentative guidelines could be given on how such manuals could be designed and written. Moreover, we propose several kinds of follow-up research that still have to be carried out to gather more knowledge on the topic of manuals for the elderly.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KelleyC. L. and CharnessN., Issues in Training Older Adults to Use Computers, Behavior and Information Technology, 14, pp. 107–120, 1995.
2.
CzajaS. J., Microcomputers and the Elderly, in Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, HelanderM. (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.
3.
RabbittP. M. A., How Do Old People Know What to Do Next? in Aging and Cognitive Processes, CraikF. I. M. and TrehubS. (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, 1982.
4.
van HeesM., Oud geleerd, oud gedaan: optimalisering van handleidingen voor ouderen (Learned in Old Age, Done in Old Age: Optimization of Manuals for the Elderly), unpublished master's thesis, Utrecht, 1994.
5.
CharnessN., Aging and Problem-Solving Performance, in Aging and Human Performance, CharnessN. (ed.), Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1985.
6.
RebokG. W., Age Effects in Problem Solving in Relation to Irrelevant Information Dimensional Preferences, and Feedback, Experimental Aging Research, 7, pp. 393–403, 1981.
7.
CaplanL. J. and SchoolerC., The Effects of Analogical Training Models and Age on Problem-Solving in a New Domain, Experimental Aging Research, 16, pp. 151–154, 1990.
8.
NewellA. and SimonH. A., Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1972.
9.
HayesJ. R., The Complete Problem Solver (2nd Edition), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1989.
10.
HasherL. and ZacksR. T., Automatic and Effortful Processes in Memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, pp. 356–388, 1979.
11.
JohnsonM. M. S., Age Differences in Decision Making: A Process Methodology for Examining Strategic Information Processing, Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 45, pp. 75–78, 1990.
12.
BrighamM. C. and PressleyM., Cognitive Monitoring and Strategy Choice in Younger and Older Adults, Psychology and Aging, 3, pp. 249–257, 1988.
13.
KauslerD. H., Episodic Memory: Memorizing Performance, in Aging and Human Performance, CharnessN. (ed.), Chichester, 1985.
14.
HartleyJ. T., Aging and Individual Differences in Memory for Written Discourse, in Language, Memory, and Aging, LightL. L. and BurkeD. M. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York, 1988.
15.
FiskA. D. and RogersW. A., Toward an Understanding of Age-Related Memory and Visual Search Effects, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, pp. 131–149, 1991.
16.
CerellaJ., Age-Related Decline in Extrafoveal Letter Perception, Journal of Gerontology, 40, pp. 727–736, 1985.
17.
AllenP. A.PattersonM. B., and PropperR. E., Influence of Letter Size on Age Differences in Letter Matching, Journal of Gerontology, 49, pp. 24–26, 1994.
18.
BoumaH., Is Large Print Easy to Read?IPO Annual Progress Report, 17, pp. 84–90, 1982.
19.
HessT. M., Effects of Semantically Related and Unrelated Contexts on Recognition Memory of Different-Aged Adults, Journal of Gerontology, 39, pp. 444–451, 1984.
20.
KemperS., Imitation of Complex Syntactic Constructions by Elderly Adults, Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, pp. 277–287, 1986.
21.
FeierC. D. and GerstmanL. J., Sentence Comprehension Abilities throughout the Adult Life Span, Journal of Gerontology, 35, pp. 722–728, 1980.
22.
CohenG., Language Comprehension in Old Age, Cognitive Psychology, 11, pp. 412–429, 1979.
23.
van DijkT. A. and KintschW., Strategies of Discourse Comprehension, Academic Press, New York, 1983.
24.
DixonR. A., Text Recall in Adulthood as a Function of Level of Information, Input Modality, and Delay Interval, Journal of Gerontology, 37, pp. 358–364, 1982.
25.
CohenC. and FaulknerD.Memory for Text: Some Age Differences in the Nature of the Information that is Retained after Listening to Texts, in Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes, BoumaH. and BouwhuisD. G. (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1984.
26.
SpilichG. J., Life-Span Components of Text Processing: Structural and Procedural Differences, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, pp. 231–244, 1983.
27.
ZelinskiE. M.LightL. L., and GilewskiM. J., Adult Age Differences in Memory for Prose: The Question of Sensitivity to Passage Structure, Developmental Psychology, 20, pp. 1181–1192, 1984.
28.
CohenG., Inferential Reasoning in Old Age, Cognition, 9, pp. 59–72, 1981.
29.
ZacksR. T. and HasherL., Capacity Theory and the Processing of Inferences, in Language, Memory, and Aging, LightL. L. and BurkeD. M. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York, 1988.
30.
BelmoreS. M., Age-Related Changes in Processing Explicit and Implicit Language, Journal of Gerontology, 36, pp. 316–322, 1981.
31.
LightL. L. and CappsJ. L., Comprehension of Pronouns in Young and Older Adults, Developmental Psychology, 22, pp. 580–585, 1986.
32.
KlineD. W. and SchieberF., Vision and Aging, in Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (2nd Edition), BirrenJ. E. and SchaieK. W. (eds.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1985.
33.
MorellR. W. and ParkD. C., The Effects of Age, Illustrations, and Task Variables on the Performance of Procedural Assembly Tasks, Psychology and Aging, 8, pp. 389–399, 1993.
34.
CremeerR. and ZeefE. J., What Kind of Noise Increases with Age?Journal of Gerontology, 42, pp. 515–518, 1987.
35.
FrazierL. and HoyerW. J., Object Recognition by Component Features: Are There Age Differences, Experimental Aging Research, 18, pp. 9–14, 1992.
36.
SalthouseT. A. and PrillK. A., Effects of Aging on Perceptual Closure, American Journal of Psychology, 101, pp. 217–238, 1988.
37.
WhitfieldK. E. and EliasJ. W., Age Cohort Differences in the Ability to Perform Closure on Degraded Figures, Experimental Aging Research, 18, pp. 67–73, 1992.
38.
PludeD. J.MilbergW. P., and CerellaJ., Age Differences in Depicting and Perceiving Tridimensionality in Simple Line Drawings, Experimental Aging Research, 12, pp. 221–225, 1986.
39.
Johnson-LairdP. N., Mental Models in Cognitive Science, Cognitive Science, 4, pp. 71–115, 1980.
40.
SchmalhoferF. and GlavanovD., Three Components of Understanding a Programmers' Manual: Verbatim, Propositional and Situational Representations, Journal of Memory and Language, 25, pp. 279–294, 1986.
41.
RadvanskyG. A., Younger and Older Adults' Use of Mental Models as Representations for Text Materials, Psychology and Aging, 5, pp. 209–214, 1990.
42.
NebesR. D. and MaddenD. J., The Use of Focused Attention in Visual Search by Young and Old Adults, Experimental Aging Research, 9, pp. 139–143, 1983.
43.
NissenM. J. and CorkinS., Effectiveness of Attentional Cueing in Older and Younger Adults, Journal of Gerontology, 40, pp. 185–191, 1985.
44.
PludeD. J. and HoyerW. J., Attention and Performance: Identifying and Localizing Age Deficits, in Aging and Human Performance, CharnessN. (ed.), Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1985.
45.
FozardJ. L., Physiology of Aging, in Gerontechnology, BoumaH. and GraafmansJ. A. M. (eds.), Amsterdam, 1992.
46.
HaighR., The Ageing Process: A Challenge for Design, Applied Ergonomics, 24, pp. 9–14, 1993.
47.
KallmanD. A.PlatoC. C., and TobinJ. D., The Role of Muscle Loss in Age-Related Decline of Grip Strength: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Perspectives, Journals of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 45, pp. 82–86, 1991.
48.
HartleyJ., Designing Instructional Text (3rd Edition), Kogan Page, London, 1994.
49.
JohnsonM. M. S., Thinking about Strategies During, Before, and After Making a Decision, Psychology and Aging, 8, pp. 231–241, 1993.
50.
HillO. L., Media Design for an Aging Workforce, Technical Communications, 5, pp. 639–641, 1995.
