This study examines gender differences in computer attitudes and experiences of adolescents. A sample of students from five Bay Area high schools was surveyed for their uses of computers before and during their high school years, in both formal instruction and informal settings. Adolescent males had greater total exposure to computers, based primarily on higher enrollments in computer programming classes and participation in voluntary experiences, such as home computer use. Fewer gender differences were found in enrollment in classes using computers for purposes other than programming. Overall, males held more positive attitudes of interest in and confidence with computers than did females. Controlling for amount of computer experience, however, males and females responded with similar levels of interest. Social influences, especially those among peer groups, are explored as important factors for differential rates of participation in computer activities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChenM., A Macrofocus on Microcomputers: Eight Utilization and Effects Issues, in Children and Microcomputers: Research on the Newest Medium, ChenM. and PaisleyW. J. (eds.), Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, pp. 19–36, 1985.
2.
LepperM., Microcomputers in Education: Motivational and Social Issues, American Psychologist, 40: 1, pp. 1–18, 1985.
3.
PaisleyW. and ChenM., The Second Electronic Revolution: The Computer and Children, in Communication Yearbook 8, BostromR. (ed.), Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, pp. 106–136, 1984.
4.
BeckerH., How Schools Use Microcomputers: Results From a National Survey, in Children and Microcomputers: Research on the Newest Medium, ChenM. and PaisleyW. J. (eds.), Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, pp. 87–108, 1985.
5.
Center for Social Organization of Schools, School Uses of Microcomputers: Reports From a National Survey, Issue No. 3, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, April, 1983.
6.
RogersE. M.DaleyH., and WuT., The Diffusion of Home Computers, Stanford University, Institute for Communication Research, Stanford, California, 1982.
7.
ChipmanS. F. and ThomasV. G., Women's Participation in Mathematics: Outlining the Problem, in Women and Mathematics: Balancing the Equation, ChipmanS. F.BrushL. R., and WilsonD. M. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 1–25, 1985.
8.
MacCobyE. E. and JacklinC., The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1974.
9.
ArmstrongJ., A National Assessment of Achievement and Participation of Women in Mathematics, Education Commission of the States, Denver, Colorado, 1979.
10.
Educational Testing Service, National College-Bound Seniors, College Entrance Examination Board, Princeton, New Jersey, 1979.
11.
FennemaE. and ShermanJ., Sex-related Differences in Mathematics Achievement, Spatial Visualization, and Affective Factors, American Educational Research Journal, 14, pp. 51–71, 1977.
12.
FennemaE. and ShermanJ., Sex-related Differences in Mathematics Achievement and Related Factors: A Further Study, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9, pp. 189–203, 1978.
13.
WiseL.SteelL., and MacDonaldC., Origins and Career Consequences of Sex Differences in High School Mathematics Achievement, American Institutes for Research, Palo Alto, California, 1979.
14.
LockheedM., Women, Girls, and Computers: A First Look at the Evidence, Sex Roles, in press.
15.
HawkinsJ., Computers and Girls: Rethinking the Issues, Sex Roles, in press.
16.
LinnM. C., Fostering Equitable Consequences from Computer Learning Environments, Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California, Berkeley, 1984.
17.
RockD.EkstromR.GoertzM.PollackJ., and HiltonT., A Study of Excellence in High School Education: Longitudinal Study, 1980–1982, unpublished manuscript, National Center for Education Research.
18.
BeckerH., The Second National Survey of Instructional Uses of School Computers: A Preliminary Report, Classroom Computer Learning, in press.
19.
HessR. and MiuraI. T., Gender Differences in Enrollment in Computer Camps and Classes: The Extracurricular Acquisition of Computer Training, Sex Roles, in press.
20.
RevelleG.HoneyM.AmselE.SchaubleL., and LevineG., Sex Differences in the Use of Computers, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, April, 1984.
21.
KieslerS.SproullL., and EcclesJ. S., Poolhalls, Chips, and War Games: Women in the Culture of Computing, Psychology of Women Quarterly, in press.
22.
KieslerS.SproullL., and EcclesJ. S., Second-class Citizens?, Psychology Today, pp. 41–48, 1983.
23.
LinS. and LepperM., Correlates of Children's Usage of Videogames and Computers, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, in press.
24.
CarpenterT.CoburnM. K.KepnerH. S.Jr.LindquistM., and ReysR. E., Results from the Second Mathematics Assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia, 1981.
25.
AndersonR. O.KlassenD. L.KrohnK. R., and Smith-CunnienP., Assessing Computer Literacy: Computer Awareness and Literacy: An Empirical Assessment, Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium, Minneapolis, 1982.
26.
California Assessment Program, Computer Literacy of California's Sixth and Twelfth Grade Students, California State Department of Education, Sacramento, California, 1984.
27.
EastmanS. T. and KrendlK. A., Computers and Gender: Differential Effects of Electronic Search on Students' Achievement and Attitudes, Indiana University, Department of Telecommunications, Bloomington, Indiana, 1984.
28.
ChenM., “Gender Differences in Adolescents' Uses of and Attitudes Toward Computers,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Department of Communication, Stanford, California, 1985.
29.
Dataquest, Survey Bulletin: February 1985 Top Line Survey Data, San Jose, California, 1985.
30.
ChipmanS. F. and WilsonD. M., Understanding Mathematics Course Enrollment and Mathematics Achievement: A Synthesis of the Research, in Women and Mathematics: Balancing the Equation, ChipmanS. F.BrushL. R., and WilsonD. M. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 275–328, 1985.
31.
MacCobyE. E., Social Groupings in Childhood: Their Relationships to Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Boys and Girls, in Development of Antisocial and Prosocial Behavior, BlockJ.OlweusD., and YarrowM. R. (eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1986.
32.
Eccles-ParsonsJ.AdlerT. F.FuttermanR.GoffS.KaczalaC.MeeceJ. L., and MidgleyC., Expectancies, Values, and Academic Choice, in Achievement and Achievement Motivation, SpenceJ. (ed.), W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1983.
