This report describes the consequences and some aspects of the origin and development of victim blaming in accident analysis, and some methods for investigating such events, with particular emphasis on the situation in Brazil. In Brazil, the spread of this practice seems to have been helped by several factors. (1) The idea that occupational accidents are simple phenomena with a limited number of causal factors linked to unsafe actions and/or conditions. In the past, the theory of accident proneness had less influence than in other countries. (2) Government regulations that stipulate the hiring of health and safety officers, production of “educational” material, and “preventive” campaigns that emphasize the role of the victim's “faulty” behavior in the origin of an accident. (3) Mandatory implementation of standardized models for accident investigation directed toward searching for a single “cause.” Usually one conclusion, expressed in terms of unsafe acts or conditions, is formulated so that whoever performs an unsafe act is responsible for the accident. (4) Lack of knowledge, as shown in Brazilian publications on occupational accidents and in the evolution of studies on the nature of accident phenomena and of strategies adopted for their prevention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HaddonW., Jr. The changing approach to the epidemiology, prevention and amelioration of trauma: The transition to approaches etiologically rather than descriptively based. Am. J. Public Health58(8): 1431–1438, 1968.
2.
HaleA. R., and HaleM.A Review of the Industrial Accident Research Literature. Committee on Safety and Health at Work Research Paper. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1972.
3.
DwyerT., and RafertyA. E., Industrial accidents are produced by social relations of work: A sociological theory of industrial accidents. Appl. Ergon.22(3): 167–178, 1991.
4.
DwyerT.A produção social dos acidentes de trabalho. 1⊃ seminário Franco Brasileiro sobre “Emprego, Divisão de trabalho, Divisão de Riscos e Saúde”—USP. São Paulo, 1984.
5.
DwyerT.Life and Death at Work: Industrial Accidents as a Case of Socially Produced Error. Plenum Press, New York, 1991.
6.
NicholsT.The sociology of accidents and the social production of industrial injury. In People and Work, edited by EslandG.. pp. 217–229. Holmes McDougal/Open University Press, Edinburgh/Milton Keynes, 1975.
7.
WigglesworthE. C., The fault doctrine and injury control. Trauma18(12): 789–794, 1978.
8.
CarterF. A., and CorlettE. N.Shiftwork and accidents. In Psychological Approaches to Night and Shiftwork: International Research Papers, edited by WidenburnA. and SmithP.. Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, 1984.
9.
LeplatJ., and CunyX.Les accidents du travail. P.U.F., Paris, 1979.
10.
AllegranteJ. P., and SloanR. P., Ethical dilemmas in workplace health promotion. Prev. Med.15: 313–320, 1986.
11.
FeyerA. M., and WilliamsonA. M., A classification system for causes of occupational accidents for use in preventive strategies. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health.17: 302–311, 1991.
12.
SaasR., and CookG., Accident proneness: Science or non-science?Int. J. Health Serv. 11(2): 175–190, 1981.
13.
SzaszA., Accident proneness: The career of an ideological concept. Psychol. Soc. Theory.4: 24–35, 1984.
14.
HoyosC. G., and ZimolongB.Occupational Safety and Accident Prevention: Behavioural Strategies and Methods. Advances in Human Factors/Ergonomics, No. 11. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.
15.
CohnA.Acidentes do trabalho: Uma forma de violência. Ed. Brasiliense, CEDEC, São Paulo, 1985.
16.
Serviço Social da Indústria, Departamento Regional de São Paulo.Evite acidentes. CIPA J.XVIII(141): 2–3, 1967.
17.
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas.Cadastro de acidentes. Norma Brasileira 18. ABTN, São Paulo, 1975.
18.
MielnikI.Higiene mental do trabalho. Artes Médicas, São Paulo, 1976.
19.
FilhoRibeiro L. F.Acidente do trabalho. In Curso de medicina do trabalho, Livro 3, pp. 765–791. Ministério do Trabalho—Fundacentro, São Paulo, 1981.
20.
ZocchioA.Prática da prevenção de acidentes: ABC da segurança do trabalho. Atlas, São Paulo, 1980.
21.
OushiroO. M.Manual de prevenção de acidentes para o trabalho e têxtil. Fundacentro, São Paulo, 1980.
22.
Ministério do Trabalho-Fundacentro.Manual de prevenção de acidentes para o trabalhador têxtil. São Paulo, 1980.
23.
Ministério do Trabalho-Fundacentro.Manual de prevenção de acidentes para agentes de mestria na indústria têxtil. São Paulo, 1981.
24.
Ministério do Trabalho-Fundacentro.CIPA. Curso de treinamento, Ed. 2. São Paulo, 1983.
25.
ClementeD.Análise e comunicação do acidente do trabalho. In Curso de engenharia do trabalho, Livro 6, pp. 1439–1454. Fundacentro, São Paulo, 1981.
26.
SaadE. G.Introdução a engenharia de segurança do trabalho. Fundacentro, São Paulo, 1981.
27.
CamargoD. A.A influência dos fatores psicológicos nos acidentes do trabalho, pp. 162–173. Mimeo. Hospital do SEPACO. Serviço Social da Indústria do Papel, Papelão e Cortiça do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, 1988.
28.
Sulzer-AzaroffB.Behavioural approaches to occupational safety and health. In Handbook of Organisational Behaviour Management, edited by FrederiksenL., pp. 505–538. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982.
29.
Sulzer-AzaroffB., The modification of occupational safety behaviour. J. Occup. Accid.9(3): 177–197, 1987.
30.
BinderM. C. P.AzevedoN. D., and AlmeidaI. M., A construção da culpa. Trabalho & Saúde14(37): 15–17, 1994.
31.
WallerJ. A., Injury: Conceptual shifts and preventive implications. Annu. Rev. Public Health8: 21–49, 1987.
32.
VidalM., A evolução conceitual da noção de acidente do trabalho: Consequências metodológicas sobre o diagnóstico de segurança. Cadernos DEP13: 1–29, 1991.
33.
BrownI. D.Accident reporting and analysis. In Evaluation of Human Work: A Practical Ergonomics Methodology, edited by WilsonJ. R. and CorlettE. N., pp. 755–778. Taylor & Francis, London, 1990.
34.
HeinrichH. W.Industrial Accident Prevention: A Scientific Approach. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959.
35.
MonteauM., and PhamD.L'Accident du travail—evolution des conceptions. In Traité de psychologie du travail, edited by Levy-LeboyerC. and SperandioJ. C.. P.U.F., Paris, 1988.
36.
RasmussenJ.The definition of human error and a taxonomy for technical system design. In New Technology and Human Error, edited by RasmussenJ.DuncanK., and LeplatJ., pp. 23–30. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1987.
37.
RasmussenJ.Cognitive control and human error mechanisms. In New Technology and Human Error, edited by RasmussenJ.DuncanK., and LeplatJ.. pp. 53–61. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1987.
38.
LeplatJ.Erreur humaine, fiabilité humaine dans le travail. Armand Colin, Paris, 1985.
39.
KirwanB., Human error: Identification in human reliability assessment. Part 1: Overview of approaches. Appl. Ergon.23(5): 299–318, 1992.
40.
KirwanB., Human error: Identification in human reliability assessment. Part 2: Detailed comparison of techniques. Appl. Ergon.23(6): 371–381, 1992.
41.
BerlinguerG.A doença. Cebes-Hucitec, São Paulo, 1988.
42.
BerlinguerG., A relação entre saúde e trabalho do ponto de vista bioético. Saúde e Sociedade2(2): 101–134, 1993.
43.
WisnerA.O trabalhador diante dos sistemas complexos e perigosos. In A inteligência no trabalho, pp. 57–70. Ministério do Trabalho—Fundacentro, São Paulo, 1994.
44.
LangleyJ. D., The need to discontinue the use of the term “accident” when referring to unintentional injury events. Accid. Anal. Prev.20(1): 1–8, 1988.
45.
MéricM.Enseignements tires de formations en enterprises a L'arbre des causes d'un accident: De la transmission d'une technique à la formation-action. Communication presented at Illème Congrés Psychologie du Travail de Langue Française, Paris, February 20–23, 1984.
46.
MonteauM.La gestion de la prise de risque chez l'operateur. In La prise de risque dans le travail, edited by GoguelinP. and CunyX., pp. 237–252. Octares Edition, Paris, 1989.
47.
JohnsonW. G., Sequences in accident causation. J. Safety Res. 5(2): 54–57, 1973.
48.
JohnsonW. G., MORT: The management oversight and risk tree. J. Safety Res. 7(1): 4–15, 1975.
49.
MonteauM.Essai de classement des risques professionelles et des actions de prévention. Cahiers de Notes Documentaires78, 1974.
50.
MonteauM.Bilan des méthodes d'analyse d'accidents du travail. Report No. 456/RE. INRS, Nancy, France, 1979.
DumaineJ., La modélisation du phénomène accident. Accidentologie et recherche a priori des risques graves. Securité et Medicine du Travail71: 11–22, 1985.
53.
NolterJ. C., and JohnsonR. D.How to conduct an accident investigation. In Handbook of Occupational Safety and Health, edited by LawrenceS.. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1987.
54.
MonteauM., and FavaroM., Bilan des méthodes d'analyse a priori des risques. 1. Des contrôles à l'ergonomie de systémes. Cahiers de Notes Documentaires138: 91–114, 1990.
55.
SimardM.La prise de risque dans le travail, un phénomene organisationnel. In La prise de risque dans le travail, edited by GoguelinP. and CunyX., pp. 71–85. Octares Edition, Paris, 1989.
56.
PhamD., Quelques facteurs de réussite ou échec de l'introduction dans l'entreprise de la méthode “arbre des causes” de l'INRS. Etude comparative dans deux établissements d'un groupe industriel. Cahiers de Notes Documentaires135: 347–354, 1989.
57.
HofmanD. A.JacobsR., and LandyF., High reliability process industries: Individual, micro, and macro organisational influences on safety performance. J. Safety Res. 26(3): 131–149, 1995.
58.
MonteauM.La sécurité en entreprise: Facteurs et evolution. Mimeo. Institut National de Récherche et de Sécurité, Vandoeuvre, n.d.
59.
WigglesworthE. C., Occupational injuries: An exploratory analysis of successful Australian strategies. Med. J. Aust.1: 335–339, 1976.
60.
HaddonW.Jr., and Baker, S. P. Injury control. In Preventive and Community Medicine, edited by ClarkD. W. and MacMahonB., pp. 109–140. Little, Brown, Boston, 1981.
GielenA. C., Health education an injury control: Integrating approaches. Health Educ. Q.19(2): 203–218, 1992.
63.
WigglesworthE. C., A teaching model of injury causation and a guide for selecting countermeasures. Occup. Psychol.46: 69–78, 1972.
64.
HiranoS.RedkoC. P., and FerrazV. R. T., A cidadania do trabalhador acidentado: (Re)conhecimento do direito aos direitos sociais. Tempo Social: Revista de Sociologia da USP2(1): 127–150, 1990.
65.
Estado de São Paulo. A morte no trabalho. São Paulo, October 5, 1996.
