Abstract
The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the ability of photography students to focus a camera accurately under two levels of illumination (high/low) with three types of focusing screens (plain groundglass, split-image and microprism). The participants were required to focus each screen three times under each light level; scores were focus errors in feet. A 2 × 3 MANOVA design was used, and post hoc comparisons were made for plain vs. split-image, plain vs. microprism, and plain vs. microprism and split-image combined.
There was significantly less focus error (p < .05) under the low illumination level, but no significant difference between screen types across both light levels. The screen type X light level interaction was much higher than the p .05 required in this study. Plain groundglass produced the least overall error; microprism yielded the least error under low illumination and the highest error under high illumination; and split-image was the most accurate under high illumination and the least accurate for the low light level condition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.