The use of visual representation to learn science can be traced to Louis Agassiz, Harvard Professor of Zoology, in the mid-19th century. In Agassiz's approach, students were to study nature through carefully observing, drawing and then thinking about what the observations might add up to. However, implementation of Agassiz's student-centered approach has struggled with the conflict between science as a form of developing “mental discipline” in which mastery of scientific facts is the goal and science learning as a socially situated activity with an emphasis on the process of learning, not merely its products. Present-day attempts to have students draw to learn science often succumb to these same conflicts, limiting their full realization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgassizL., Methods of Study in Natural History, Atlantic Monthly, 9, pp. 1–13, January, 1862.
2.
CooperL., Louis Agassiz as a Teacher: Illustrative Extracts on His Method of Instruction, Ithaca, Comstock, New York, 1917.
3.
ScudderS., In the Laboratory with Agassiz, Every Saturday, 6, pp. 369–370, April 4, 1874.
4.
PoteatW. L., The Laboratory as Means of Culture, School Science, 1: 6, pp. 287–288, 1901.
5.
How to Educate Young Scientists. The New York Times, p. A14, July 3, 2006.
6.
SchonbornK. J. and AndersonT. R.The Importance of Visual Literacy in the Education of Biochemists, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34: 2, pp. 94–102, 2006.
7.
AgassizE. C. (ed.), Louis Agassiz: His Life and Correspondence, Houghton, Mifflin, Boston, 1886.
8.
RudolphE. D., History of the Botanical Teaching Laboratory in the United States, American Journal of Botany, 83: 5, pp. 661–671, 1996.
9.
CampbellJ. P., Biological Teaching in the Colleges of the United States, Bureau of Education, Washington, 1891.
10.
LurieE., Louis Agassiz: A Life in Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1960.
11.
TellerJ. D., Louis Agassiz, Scientist and Teacher, Ohio State University Press, Columbus, 1947.
12.
GuralnickS. M., Science and the Ante-Bellum American College, American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, 1975.
13.
RudolphF., The American College and University: A History, Knopf, New York, 1962.
14.
HofstadterR. and HardyC. D., The Development and Scope of Higher Education in the United States, Columbia University Press, New York, 1952.
15.
RosenS., A History of Science Teaching in the American Public High School, 1820–1920, Dissertation, Harvard University Graduate School of Education, 1955.
16.
Report of the Committee of Ten on Secondary School Studies, National Educational Association/American Book Company, New York, 1894.
17.
LocyW. A., On Teaching Zoology to College Classes, Education, 9: 10, pp. 673–683, 1889.
18.
HydeI. H., Laboratory Outlines of Physiology, University of Kansas Dept. of Physiology, 1914, University of Kansas Archives, RG 17/40/19, Folder, Physiology. Hyde. Laboratory Outlines.
19.
HydeI. H., Laboratory Guide, Elementary Physiology, University Extension Division, Correspondence-Study Department, 1914. University of Kansas Archives, RG 17/40/19, Folder, Physiology. Assignments, Final Examinations, 1914.
20.
CofrancescoH. W., Anatomy Laboratory Sketchbook, 1923. Yale University Manuscripts and Archives, RU 159, Box 15.
21.
DeweyJ., Science as Subject-Matter and as Method, Science, 31: 787, pp. 121–127, 1910.
22.
CreminL. A., The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education, 1876–1957, Vintage, New York, 1961.
23.
GrierN. M., On the Approval for Accrediment of College Science Laboratories, Science Education, 19: 1, pp. 19–23, 1935.
24.
DeBoerG. E., A History of Ideas in Science Education, Teachers College Press, New York, 1991.
25.
VeyseyL. R., The Emergence of the American University, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1965.
26.
UrofskyM. I., Reforms and Response: The Yale Report of 1828, History of Education Quarterly, 5: 1, pp. 53–67, 1965.
27.
HuxleyT. H., Science and Education, Appleton, New York, 1899.
28.
FreireP., Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Herder and Herder, New York, 1972.
29.
RothW.-M., Construction Sites: Science Labs and Classrooms, in The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, TobinK. (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 145–170, 1993.
30.
TobinK. and TippinsD., Constructivism as a Referent for Teaching and Learning, in The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, TobinK. (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 3–21, 1993.
LearnerN., A History of WAC at a College of Pharmacy, Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, 5: 1, pp. 6–19, 2001.
37.
HobsonE. and LernerN., Writing Centers/WAC in Pharmacy Education: A Changing Prescription, in Writing Centers and Writing Across the Curriculum Programs: Building Interdisciplinary Partnerships, BarnettR. W. and BlumnerJ. S. (eds.), Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, pp. 155–175, 1999.
38.
LernerN.PadsDrill, Teaching Machines, and Programmed Texts: Origins of Instructional Technology in Writing Centers, in Wiring the Writing Center, HobsonE. H. (ed.), Utah State University Press, Logan, pp. 119–136, 1998.
