Automated medication dispensing systems for hospital pharmacies, heralded as an important means of reducing drug errors and improving labor productivity, have also been seen as a means of furthering the transformation of the pharmacy profession from its role in dispensing prescriptions to a clinical profession concerned with treatments and patient outcomes. Automation aids this transformation by transferring the responsibility for routine dispensing to technicians performing rationalized and computer-mediated tasks. Not all pharmacists agree with these trends. Some fear a loss of professional status and employment as their knowledge is expropriated and incorporated into machinery operated by those with lesser qualifications. They fear an industrial rather than a clinical future. Their concerns are compounded by health care cutbacks. These issues were studied at two hospitals in Canada and one in France, all mid-sized public hospitals with automated unit dose drug delivery systems installed in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Preliminary results indicated national differences in approaches to hospital pharmacy automation. In Canada, pharmacists have resisted major changes in their control of the dispensing process and in their traditional roles vis à vis doctors and pharmacy technicians. In France, where hospital pharmacy as a profession is less developed than in North America, automation has brought about a far more radical substitution for pharmacists' labor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BirnbaumA.In the Shadow of Medicine. General Hall, New York, 1990.
2.
KnightsD., and WillmottH. (eds.). Labour Process Theory. Macmillan, London, 1990.
3.
HeplerC.The third wave in pharmaceutical education: The clinical movement. Am. J. Pharm. Educ.15: 369–383, 1987.
4.
HeplerC., and StrandL.Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 47: 533–543, 1990.
5.
MuzzinL.BrownG., and HornostyR.Professional ideology in Canadian pharmacy. Health Can. Soc.1: 319–345, 1993.
6.
BroadheadR., and FaccinettiN.Drug iatrogenesis and clinical pharmacy: The mutual fate of a social problem and a clinical movement. Soc. Probl. 32: 425–436, 1985.
7.
ReichR.The Work of Nations. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1991.
8.
MannJ., and GrahamK.Hospital pharmacy in the twenty first century. On Continuing Pract. 16: 27, 1989.
9.
ParkerP.Improving post graduate pharmacy residency training. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 47: 88–90, 1990.
10.
IveyM.Shifting pharmacy's paradigm. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 50: 869–874, 1993.
11.
ConklinD.Human Resources and Hospital Pharmacy. Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists, Markham, Ont., 1991.
12.
Pharmacy manager, “Salvation General Hospital.”Private communication. Winnipeg, June 1994.
WichmanK.Technology—Threat or opportunity. Can. J. Hosp. Pharm. 46: 128, 1993.
15.
HynnimanC.Drug product distribution systems and departmental operations. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 48(Suppl. 1): 524–535, 1991.
16.
ShaikenH.Work Transformed: Automation and Labor in the Computer Age. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1985.
17.
WollerT., and PloetzP.Expanding the role of pharmacy technician. Top. Hosp. Pharm. 22: 16–26, 1987.
18.
ManasseH.The twenty-first century hospital: Where is the pharmacist?Hosp. Pharm. 22: 16–26, 1987.
19.
PaluckE.StrattonT., and GreerM. A.A study of selected issues involving pharmacy technician training in Canada. Can. J. Hosp. Pharm. 46: 197–205, 1993.
20.
JessM.Adapting pharmaceutical care to reality. Hosp. Pharm. 28: 896–898, 1993.
21.
HallK., pharmacy manager, Health Sciences Centre. Private communication. Winnipeg, May 1994.
22.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Health Care Systems in Transition: The Search for Efficiency. Paris, 1990.
23.
NavarroV.Why some countries have national health insurance, others have national health services, and the United States has neither. Int. J. Health Serv.19: 383–404, 1989.
24.
SchnellB.A study of unit dose drug distribution in four Canadian hospitals. Can. J. Hosp. Pharm., May/June 1976, pp. 85–90.
25.
O'BrodovichM., and RappoportP.A study of pre and post unit dose conversion in a pediatric hospital. Can. J. Hosp. Pharm. 44: 5–15, 1991.
26.
MoulsmaA.La pharmacie clinique au Québec: Ses aspects pratiques. Le Pharmacien Hospitalier89: 15–24, 1987.
27.
KlammerG., and EnsomR.Pharmacy refill checking: Safe and practical. Can. J. Hosp. Pharm. 47: 117–123, 1994.
28.
JonesD.CraneV., and TrusselR.Automated medication dispensing: The ATC system. Hosp. Pharm. 24: 604–610, 1989.
29.
PaluckE.StrattonT., and GreerM.A study of selected issues involving pharmacy technician training in Canada. Can. J. Hosp. Pharm. 46: 197–205, 1993.
30.
ZuboffS.In the Age of the Smart Machine. Basic Books, New York, 1988.
31.
NessJ.SullivanS., and StergachisA.Accuracy of technicians and pharmacists in identifying dispensing errors. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 51: 354–357, 1994.
32.
RoachS.America's Technology Dilemma: A Profile of the Information Economy. Special Economic Study. Morgan Stanley, New York, April 1987.
33.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Technology and the Economy: The Key Relationships. Paris, 1992.
34.
SleathB., and FacchinettiN.Impact of computerization on New England hospital pharmacy personnel. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 47: 2070–2071, 1990.
35.
WollerT.Checking of unit dose cassettes by pharmacy technicians at three Minnesota hospitals. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 48: 1952–1956, 1991.
36.
Province of Manitoba.Manitoba Pharmaceutical Act. Undated.
37.
HammerG., and EnsomR.Pharmacy refill checking: Safe and practical. Can. J. Hosp. Pharm. 47: 117–123, 1994.
38.
BraunW.Letter to Manitoba Pharmaceutical Association. Winnipeg, March 22, 1994.
39.
Ad Hoc Committee, Manitoba Pharmaceutical Association.Institutional Unit Dose Drug Distribution Draft Guidelines. June 21, 1994.
40.
RambourgP.Prescription-dispensation dans les hôpitaux fran&çais en 1992. Pharm. Hosp. Fr. 103: 35–37, 1992.
41.
Synicat national des pharmaciens praticiens et residents des établissements fran&çais d'hôpitalisation.Livre Blanc de la Pharmacie Hospitalière Fran&çaise. Synpreph, 1994.
42.
GenelleB.Plaidoyer pour la dispensation nominative. Le Moniteur Hospitalier49: 34–40, 1992.
43.
MarianiM., and MaggioG.Réflexions sur l'organisation des pharmacies hospitalières. Techniques Hospitalières553: 41–42, 1991.
44.
LapeyreM., and SchmittE.Maitriser les dépenses pharmaceutiques hospitalières. Gestion Hospitalière272: 25–34, 1988.
45.
CaudronS.La pharmacie hospitalière de l'empirisme à la gestion informatique. Decision Santé40: 26–29, 1993.
46.
BlocquauxV.Le pharmacien d'hôpital. Espace Social Européen7: 12, 1992.
47.
Le Statut de Préparateur en Pharmacie. Décret No. 48-822 du 10 mai 1948. Extrait.
48.
ThurowL.Head to Head. William Morrow, New York, 1992.
49.
RudnichiA.La prescription pharmaceutique informatisée dans PCS: Principe et expérience. Informatique et Santé2: 170–180, 1989.
50.
CariouS.Suivi quotidien des interactions médicamenteuses à l'hôpital Robert Debré. Act. Pharm. Biol. Clin., 1994, pp. 539–541.
51.
SchroederC., and PierpaoliP.Direct order entry by physicians in a computerized hospital information system. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 43: 355–359, 1986.
52.
ArmstrongP., and ArmstrongH.Take Care: Warning Signals for Canada's Health System. Garamond Press, Toronto, 1994.
53.
NobleD.Progress Without People. Between the Lines, Toronto, 1995.
