Can regulation work in health services, given the present political context? General issues in the regulatory process are discussed, followed by a consideration of the relevance of these issues to the health care field. Regulatory processes are reviewed for the United States in four areas: credentialling of people, surveillance of delivery systems, quality of materials and technology, and rate-setting or cost control. It is concluded that the process cannot work. Four alternatives are presented and briefly evaluated: tinkering, centralized regulation, national health service, and general nationalization of most major economic sectors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NollR.Reforming Regulation. An Evaluation of the Ash Council Proposals. Brookings Institution, Washington, 1971.
2.
JaffeL.NathansonN.Administrative Law: Cases and Materials. Little, Brown, Boston, 1968.
3.
FriendlyH.The Federal Administrative Agencies: The Need for Better Definition of Standards. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1962.
4.
FellmethR., editor. The Interstate Commerce Omission: Ralph Nader's Study Group Report on the Interstate Commerce Commission and Transportation. Grossman, New York, 1969.
5.
GreenM.MooreB.WassersteinB.The Closed Enterprise System: Ralph Nader's Study Group Report on Antitrust Enforcement. Grossman, New York, 1972.
6.
GreenM.The Monopoly Makers: Ralph Nader's Study Group Report on Regulation and Competition. Grossman, New York, 1973.
7.
GouldenJ.The Superlawyers. The Small and Powerful World of the Great Washington Law Firms. Weybright and Talley, New York, 1971.
8.
BanfieldE.Revenue sharing in theory and practice. Public Interest23: 33–45, 1971.
9.
WrightD.Intergovernmental relations: An analytical overview. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science416: 1–16, 1974.
10.
WoodR.AlmendingerV.1400 Governments. The Political Economy of the New York Metropolitan Region. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1961.
11.
WildavskyA.The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Little, Brown, Boston, 1964.
12.
FreidsonE.Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. Dodd, Mead, New York, 1970.
13.
RayackE.Professional Power and American Medicine: The Economics of the American Medical Association. World Publishing Company, Cleveland, 1967.
14.
AlfordR.The political economy of health care: Dynamics without change. Politics and Society2(2): 127–164, 1972.
15.
CurranW.A severe blow to hospital planning: “Certificate of need” declared unconstitutional. N. Engl. J. Med.288: 723–724, 1973.
16.
CurranW.New paramedical personnel—To license or not to license?N. Engl. J. Med.282: 1085–1086, 1970.
17.
SchlickeC.American Surgery's Noblest Experiment. President's Address, 80th Annual Meeting, Western Surgical Association, Rochester, Minnesota, November 16, 1972.
18.
HoppockJ.The Joint Commission's Role. Paper presented to the New Jersey Hospital Association, North Brunswick, New Jersey, February 28, 1973.
19.
Massachusetts House Bill 6120, 1973 (defeated).
20.
KrauseE.Health and the politics of technology. Inquiry8(3): 51–59, 1971.
21.
KrauseE.The legal profession. In The Sociology of Occupations by KrauseE., Ch. 6. Little, Brown, Boston, 1971.
22.
DerbyshireR.Medical Licensure and Discipline in the United States. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1969.
23.
McCleeryR.KeeltyL.LamM.PhillipsR.QuirinT.One Life-One Physician. An Inquiry into the Medical Profession's Performance in Self-Regulation. Public Affairs Press, Washington, D.C., 1971.
24.
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Report on Licensure and Related Health Personnel Credentialling. DHEW Publication No. (HSM) 72-11. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1971.
25.
CohenH.Professional licensure, organizational behavior, and the public interest. Milbank Mem. Fund Q.: Health and Society51(1): 73–88, 1973.
26.
CohenH.MiikeL.Toward a more responsive system of professional licensure. Int. J. Health Serv. 4(2): 265–272, 1974.
27.
Procedure for retrospective medical care audit in hospitals. In Trustee-Administrator Physician Institutes. Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Hospitals, Chicago, 1972.
28.
PageJ.O'BrienM-W.Bitter Wages: Ralph Nader's Study Group Report on Disease and Injury on the Job. Grossman, New York, 1973.
29.
BrodeurP.Expendable Americans. Viking, New York, 1974.
30.
ScottR.Muscle and Blood. Dutton, New York, 1974.
31.
KrauseE.Health planning as a managerial ideology. Int. J. Health Serv. 3(3): 445–463, 1973.
32.
CohenH.Regulating health care facilities: The certificate-of-need process re-examined. Inquiry10(3): 3–9, 1973.
33.
CurranW.National Survey and Analysis of Certification-of-Need Laws: Health Planning and Regulation in State Legislatures, 1972, p. 27American Hospital Association, Chicago, 1973.
34.
HavighurstC.Regulation of health facilities and services by “certificate of need.”Virginia Law Review59: 1143–1232, 1973.
35.
TurnerJ.The Chemical Feast: Ralph Nader's Study Group Report on the Food and Drug Administration. Grossman, New York, 1970.
36.
SilvermanM.LeeP.Pills, Profits and Politics. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1974.
37.
TitmussR.The Gift Relationship. From Human Blood to Social Policy. Allen and Unwin, New York, 1971.
38.
SurgenorD.Progress toward a national blood system. N. Engl. J. Med.291: 17–22, 1974.
39.
Staff estimate. National Center for Health Service Research, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, January 31, 1975.
40.
Public Law 92-603, Section 1152 (a).
41.
CohenH.Regulatory Politics: The Case of Medical Care Review and Public Law 92–603. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 5, 1973.
42.
Staff estimate. Office of Professional Standards Review, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, January 31, 1975.
43.
Three separate, informal, and “not for attribution” opinions by staffers at the Office of Professional Standards Review, Bureau of Quality Assurance, and Legal Division, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, January 31, 1975.
44.
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons et al. v. Caspar Weinberger (HEW), U.S. District Court, Northern Illinois, Civil 73-C-1653, 1973.
45.
Texas Medical Association v. Caspar Weinberger (HEW), U.S. District Court, Western Texas, Civil A-74-CA-102, 1974.
46.
Legislative History of Professional Standards Review Organization Provisions of the Social Security Act Amendments. Office of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, November, 1972.
47.
CaperP.The meaning of quality in medical care. N. Engl. J. Med.291: 1136–1137, 1974.
48.
Office of the Administrator, Health Resources Administration, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Summary of S. 2994, National Health Planning and Resources Development Act of 1974, December 26, 1974 (signed in late December 1974 in this form by the President).
