All-Female Classes in High School Computer Science: Positive Effects in Three Years of Data

Abstract

In a three-year study, female students from all-female computer science (CS) classes were compared to male and female students from mixed-gender CS classes. Participants were 250 students enrolled in an elective Grade 11 CS course (63 females from three all-female classes and 155 males and 32 females from nine mixed-gender classes). Participants completed a questionnaire assessing perceived support from teachers and parents, computer-related attitudes, and future academic and occupational intentions. Females from all-female classes reported higher levels of perceived teacher support, confidence, and future academic and occupational intentions than did females from mixed-gender classes. Females from all-female classes reported levels as high as those reported by males on perceived teacher support, whereas males reported higher levels than did females from mixed-gender classes on perceived teacher support, confidence, intrinsic value, and future intentions. The present study provides some initial empirical evidence supporting the positive effects of all-female classes in CS at the high school level.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of University Women Educational Foundation Commission on Technology, Gender, and Teacher Education (2000). Tech-savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.

Braddock

(1999). Occupational employment projections to 2008. Monthly Labor Review, 122, 51–77.

Busch

(1996). Gender, group composition, cooperation, and self-efficacy in computer studies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15(2), 125–135.

Camp

(1997). The incredible shrinking pipeline. Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery, 40(10), 103–110.

Campbell

N. J.

(1990). High school students' computer attitudes and attributions: Gender and ethnic group differences. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5, 485–499.

Campbell

N. J.

(1992). Enrollment in computer courses by college students: Computer proficiency, attitudes, and attributions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25, 61–74.

Clarke

V. A.

Teague

G. J.

(1996). Characterizations of computing careers: Students and professionals disagree. Computers and Education, 26, 241–246.

Comber

Colley

Hargreaves

D. J.

Dorn

(1997). The effects of age, gender, and computer experience upon computer attitudes. Educational Research, 39, 123–133.

Corston

Colman

A. M.

(1996). Gender and social facilitation effects on computer competence and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(2), 171–183.

10.

Crombie

Abarbanel

Anderson

(2000). Bridging the gender gap in high-technology education. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 84(618), 64–73.

11.

Crombie

Armstrong

P. I.

(1999). Effects of classroom gender composition on adolescents' computer-related attitudes and future intentions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(4), 317–327.

12.

Crombie

Long

Chetcuti

Anderson

(1999). Bridging the gender gap in computer science education. Available on-line: http://cythera.ic.gc.ca/htos/cs_gendergap/.

13.

Digest of Education Statistics 1999. (1999). Table 287: Earned degrees in computer and information sciences conferred by institutions of higher education, by level of degree and sex of student: 1970–71 to 1996–97. Available on-line: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/digest99/d99t287.html

14.

Eccles

J. S.

(1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.

15.

Eccles (Parsons)

Adler

T. F.

Futterman

Goff

S. B.

Kaczala

C. M.

Meece

J. L.

Midgley

(1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In Spence

J. T.

(Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.

16.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

Schiefele

(1998). Motivation to succeed. In Damon

Eisenberg

(Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed.) (pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley.

17.

Fennema

Sherman

(1976). Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by males and females. Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6, 31.

18.

Fisher

Margolis

Miller

(1997). Undergraduate Women in Computer Science: Experience, Motivation and Culture. Available on-line: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/∼gendergap/papers/sigcse97/sigcse97.html

19.

Gardner

D. G.

Dukes

R. L.

Discenza

(1993). Computer use, self-confidence, and attitudes: A causal analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 427–440.

20.

Gurney

(1999). Computer class for girls only. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Educational Computing Organization of Ontario.

21.

Haag

(1998) Single-sex education in grades K-12: What does the research tell us? In Separated by sex: A critical look at single-sex education for girls (pp. 13–38). Washington, DC: American Association of University Women, AAUW Education Foundation.

22.

Hanor

J. H.

(1998). Concepts and strategies learned from girls' interactions with computers. Theory Into Practice, 37, 64–71.

23.

Hess

R. D.

Miura

I. T.

(1985). Gender differencesin enrollment in computer camps and classes. Sex Roles, 13, 193–203.

24.

Hyde

J. S.

Fennema

Ryan

Frost

L. A.

Hopp

(1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 299–324.

25.

Jones

Clarke

V. A.

(1995). Diversity as a determinant of attitudes: A possible explanation of the apparent advantage of single-sex settings. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(1), 51–64.

26.

Kahle

J. B.

Meece

(1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In Gabel

D. L.

(Ed.), Handbook of research on science teachings, and learning: A project of the national science teachers association (pp. 542–557). New York: Macmillan.

27.

Kimball

M. M.

(1989). A new perspective on women's math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198–214.

28.

Lee

V. E.

(1998). Is single-sex secondary schooling a solution to the problem of gender inequity? In Separated by sex: A critical look at single-sex education for girls (pp. 41–52). Washington, DC: American Association of University Women, AAUW Education Foundation.

29.

Levine

Donitsa-Schmidt

(1998). Computer use, confidence, attitudes, and knowledge: A causal analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 125–146.

30.

Mael

F. A.

(1998). Single-sex and coeducational schooling: Relationships to socioemotional and academic development. Review of Educational Research, 68, 101–129.

31.

Margolis

Fisher

Miller

(1999). The anatomy of interest: Women in undergraduate computer science. Available on-line: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/project/gendergap/www/papers/anatomyWSQ99.html

32.

Nelson

C. S.

Watson

J. A.

(1990). The computer gender gap: Children's attitudes, performance and socialization. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 19, 345–353.

33.

Newburger

E. C.

(1999). Computer use in the United States: Population characteristics. Current Population Reports, U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau. Available on-line: http://www.census.gov/prod/99pubs/p20-522.pdf

34.

Parker

Rennie

(1996). Single-sex grouping: Issues for school administrators. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

35.

Sadker

(1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. New York: Scribner.

36.

Schofield

J. W.

(1995). Computers and classroom culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.

37.

Shashaani

(1993). Gender-based differences in attitudes toward computers. Computers and Education, 20, 169–181.

38.

Shashaani

(1994). Gender-differences in computer experience and its influence on computer attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(4), 347–367.

39.

Shashaani

(1997). Gender differences in computer attitudes and use among college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(1), 37–51.

40.

Smith

Caputi

Crittenden

Jayasuriya

Rawstorne

(1999). A review of the construct of computer experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 227–242.

41.

Stipek

(1992). The child at school. In Bornstein

M. H.

Lamb

M. E.

(Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (3rd ed.) (pp. 579–625). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

42.

Stumpf

Stanley

J. C.

(1997). The gender gap in advanced placement computer science. College Board Review, 181, 22–27.

43.

Temple

Lips

H. M.

(1989). Gender differences and similarities in attitudes toward computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 5, 215–226.

44.

The College Board Advanced Placement Program (2000). National summary reports. Available on-line: http://cbweb1s.collegeboard.org/ap/2000/national_2000.pdf

45.

The Condition of Education 2000. (2000). Section 3—Degrees earned by women. Available on-line: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/coe2000/section3/indicator37.html

46.

Whitley

B. E.

Jr. (1996). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes: It depends on what you ask. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 275–289.

47.

Whitley

B. E.

Jr. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1–22.

48.

Woodrow

J. E. J.

(1994). The development of computer-related attitudes of secondary students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(4), 301–338.

49.

Worthington

V. L.

Zhao

(1999). Existential computer anxiety and changes in computer technology: What past research on computer anxiety has missed. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(4), 299–315.