Writing good computer manuals for beginners is a demanding job. Recently, rhetoricians have advised manual writers who want to write better manuals to consider the audience (computer users) carefully. However, my rhetorical analysis of several computer manuals shows that writers should also consider genre, subject, and writer's purpose. I also found that, while some writers accommodate their rhetorical situation, they may do it unconsciously, given the inconsistency of their rhetorical choices. In conclusion, by paying attention to the overall rhetorical situation, manual writers will surely produce better manuals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WinklerV.FergusonR., and YoungquistD., “Procedures for Designing and Evaluating Training Materials,” paper presented at the 1984 Penn State Conference on Rhetoric and Composition, University Park, Pennsylvania, July, 1985.
2.
CarsonD., Audience in Technical Writing: The Need for Greater Realism in Identifying the Fictive Reader, The Technical Writing Teacher, 7: 1, pp. 7–8, Fall, 1979.
3.
IBM, Improving the Usability of Programming Publications, IBM Systems Journal, 20: 3, pp. 306–320, 1981.
4.
AnnettC., A Structured Approach to Technical Project Documentation, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 13: 4, pp. 299–306, 1983.
5.
GusfieldJ., The Literary Rhetoric of Science: Comedy and Pathos in Drinking Driver Research, American Sociological Review, 41, pp. 16–34, February, 1976.
6.
ParkD., The Meanings of “Audience,”College English, 44: 3, pp. 247–257, March, 1982.
7.
OngW., The Writer's Audience is Always a Fiction, PMLA, 90, pp. 9–21, 1975.
8.
MillerC., “The Rhetorical Genre: An Explanatory Concept for Technical Communication,” paper presented at the MLA convention, New York, 1980.
