This article describes a study of written communication on-the-job and reports writing practices found in seventeen agricultural and engineering firms and agencies in the authors' immediate geographical region. Information was gathered by questionnaire and on-site interviews. Data confirmed the importance of writing on-the-job. Our findings demonstrate the importance of context and reveal the variations in types and length of documents, rhetorical genres, and strategies. The study proved useful for designing instructional materials and strategies and for expanding our basic understanding of what on-the-job writing entails.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BizzellP., Cognition, Convention and Certainty: What We Need to Know about Writing, Pre/Text, 3:3, pp. 213–243, 1982.
2.
DavisR. M., Technical Writing in Industry and Government, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 7:3, pp. 235–242, 1977.
3.
FaigleyL. and MillerT. P., What We Learn from Writing on the Job, College English, 44:6, pp. 557–569, 1982.
4.
KimelW. R. and MonseesM. E., Engineering Graduates: How Good Are They?Engineering Education, 70:2, pp. 210–212, 1979.
5.
StineD. and SkarzenskiK., Priorities for the Business Communication Classroom: A Survey of Business and Academe, The Journal of Business Communication, 16:3, pp. 15–20, 1979.
6.
StormsG., What Business School Graduates Say About the Writing They Do At Work: Implications for the Business Communications Course, The ABCA Bulletin, XVLI:4, pp. 13–18, 1983.
7.
AtlasM., Addressing an Audience: A Study of Expert-Novice Differences in Writing, Document Design Project: No. 3, ERIC 132338, 1979.
8.
RedishJ. C. and RacetteK., Teaching College Students How to Write: Training Opportunities for Document Designers, Document Design Project: No. 4, ERIC 192333, 1979.
9.
CoutureB. and GoldsteinJ., Cases for Technical and Professional Writing, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1985.
10.
FlowersL. and HayesJ. R., Plans that Guide the Composing Process, in Writing: Process, Development and Communication, Volume 2 of Writing: The Nature, Development and Teaching of Written Communication, FrederiksenC. and DominicJ. F. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 39–58, 1981.
11.
BrockmannR. J. (ed.), The Case Method in Technical Communication: Theory and Methods, Association of Teachers of Technical Writing, 1984.
12.
GubaE. G. and LincolnY. S., Epistemological and Methodological Bases of Naturalistic Inquiry, Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, pp. 233–252, 1982. (Developed into the Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California, 1985).
13.
OdellL. and GoswamiD., Writing in Nonacademic Settings, The Guilford Press, New York, 1985.
14.
HillocksG.Jr., Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching, ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills, Urbana, Illinois, 1986.
15.
AndersonP. V.BrockmannR. J., and MillerC. R. (eds.), New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, Practice, Volume 2, Baywood Publishing Company, Inc., Farmingdale, New York, 1983.
16.
OdellL.GoswamiD.HerringtonA., and QuickD., Studying Writing in Nonacademic Settings, in New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, Practice, Volume 2, AndersonP. V.BrockmannR. J., and MillerC. R. (eds.), Baywood Publishing Company, Inc., Farmingdale, New York, pp. 17–40, 1983.
17.
SpretnakC. M., A Survey of the Frequency and Importance of Technical Communication in an Engineering Career, The Technical Writing Teacher, 9:3, pp. 133–136, Spring 1982.
18.
LockerK. O., What Do Writers in Industry Write?Technical Writing Teacher, IX:3, pp. 122–127, Spring 1982.
19.
AndersonP. V., What Survey Research Tells Us About Writing at Work, in Writing in Nonacademic Settings, OdellL. and GoswamiD. (eds.), The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 3–83, 1985.
20.
HoupK. W. and PearsallT. E., Reporting Technical Information, 5th Edition, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, 1984.
