This study examined the effects of a Web site design project on students' motivation and achievement. Tenth-grade biology students worked together in teams on an ecology project that required them to locate relevant information on the Internet, decide which information should be included on their Web site, organize the information into Web pages, and link the pages together. A comparison group received traditional ecology instruction that included lectures and labs. Data sources included motivation questionnaires, achievement tests, student attitude questionnaires, and teacher interviews. While both groups showed similar achievement gains, the students that designed Web sites were more motivated than the students that received traditional instruction. Advantages and disadvantages of the Web site design project are reported and discussed. The results of this study indicate that it is feasible for a high-school teacher to use a student-as-designer model of instruction with Web-based technology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
TrotterA., A Question of Effectiveness, Education Week, 18:5, pp. 6–9, 1998.
2.
KozmaR. B., Constructing Knowledge with Learning Tool, in Cognitive Tools for Learning, KommersP. A. M.JonassenD. H.MayesT. (eds.), Springer, Berlin, pp. 23–32, 1992.
3.
LajoieS. P.DerryS. J. (eds.), Computers as Cognitive Tools, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1993.
4.
PiagetJ., To Understand is to Invent, Grossman, New York, 1973.
5.
VygotskyL., Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1978.
6.
LehrerR., Authors of Knowledge: Patterns of Hypermedia Design, in Computers as Cognitive Tools, LajoieS.DerryS. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 197–227, 1993.
7.
LehrerR.EricksonJ.ConnellT., Learning by Designing Hypermedia Documents, Computers in the Schools, 10, pp. 227–254, 1994.
8.
LiuM.RutledgeK., The Effect of a “Learner as Multimedia Designer” Environment on At-Risk High School Students' Motivation and Learning of Design Knowledge, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16:2, pp. 145–177, 1997.
9.
McGrathD.CumaranatungeC.JiM.ChenH.BroceW.WrightK., Multimedia Science Projects: Seven Case Studies, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30:1, pp. 18–37, 1997.
10.
KafaiY. B.ChingC. C.MarshallS., Children as Designers of Educational Multimedia Software, Computers and Education, 29:2/3, pp. 117–126, 1997.
11.
HarrisJ., Wetware: Why Use Activity Structures?Learning and Leading With Technology, 25:4, pp. 13–17, 1997/98.
12.
PapertS., Mindstorms, Basic Books, New York, 1980.
13.
PerkinsD. N., Knowledge as Design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1986.
14.
WisnudelM., Constructing Hypermedia Artifacts in Math and Science Classrooms, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 13:1, pp. 5–15, 1994.
15.
AllenC. L., Multimedia Learning Environments Designed with Organizing Principles from Non-School Settings, in Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem-Solving, de CorteE.LinnM.MandlH.VerschaffleL. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 463–484, 1992.
16.
CarverS. M.LehrerR.ConnellT.EricksonJ., Learning by Hypermedia Design: Issues of Assessment and Implementation, Educational Psychologist, 27:3, pp. 385–404, 1992.
17.
TurnerS. V.DipintoV. M., Students as Hypermedia Authors: Themes Emerging from a Qualitative Study, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25:2, pp. 187–199, 1992.
18.
TolhurstD., Hypertext, Hypermedia, Multimedia Defined?Educational Technology, 35:2, pp. 21–26, 1995.
19.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S., The Development of Achievement Task Values: A Theoretical Analysis, Developmental Review, 12, pp. 265–310, 1992.
20.
GottfriedA. E., Academic Intrinsic Motivation in Elementary and Junior High School, Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, pp. 631–645, 1985.
21.
SwannW. B.PittmanR. S., Initiating Play Activity of Children: The Moderating Influence of Verbal Cues on Intrinsic Motivation, Child Development, 48, pp. 1128–1132, 1977.
22.
ZuckermanM.PoracJ.LathinD.SmithR.DeciE. L., On the Importance of Self-Determination for Intrinsically Motivated Behavior, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, pp. 443–446, 1978.
23.
DeciE. L.SchwartzA. J.SheinmanL.RyanR. M., An Instrument to Assess Adults' Orientation toward Control versus Autonomy with Children: Reflections on Intrinsic Motivation and Perceived Competence, Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, pp. 642–650, 1981.
24.
BlumenfeldP. C.SolowayE.MarxR. W.KrajcikJ. S.GuzdialM.PalincsarA., Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning, Educational Psychologist, 26:3/4, pp. 369–398, 1991.
25.
FormanG.PufallP. B. (eds.), Constructivism in the Computer Age, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1988.
26.
President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology, Report to the President on the Use of Technology to Strengthen K-12 Education in the United States, March 1997.
27.
SalomonG., AI in Reverse: Computer Tools that Turn Cognitive, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4:2, pp. 123–134, 1988.
28.
JonassenD. H., Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model, Educational Technology, 34:4, pp. 34–37, 1994.
29.
JonassenD. H., Supporting Communities of Learners with Technology: A Vision for Integrating Technology with Learning in Schools, Educational Technology, 35:4, pp. 60–63, 1995.
30.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, The Jasper Experiment: An Exploration of Issues in Learning and Instructional Design, Educational Technology Research and Development, 40:1, pp. 65–80, 1993.
31.
PerkinsD. N., Technology Meets Constructivism: Do They Make a Marriage?Educational Technology, 31:5, pp. 18–23, 1991.
32.
FengY., Some Thoughts about Applying Constructivist Theories to Guide Instruction, Computers in the Schools, 12:3, pp. 71–84, 1996.
33.
Mac IverD. J., Effects of Improvement-Focused Student Recognition on Young Adolescents' Performance and Motivation in the Classroom, in Advances in Motivation and Achievement (Vol. 8), MaehrM. L.PintrichP. R. (eds.), JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, Connecticut, pp. 191–216, 1993.
34.
Mac IverD. J.StipekD. J.DanielsD. H., Explaining Within-Semester Changes in Student Effort in Junior High School and Senior High School Courses, Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, pp. 201–211, 1991.
35.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA., In the Mind of the Actor: The Structure of Adolescents' Achievement Task Values and Expectancy-Related Beliefs, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21:3, pp. 215–225, 1995.
36.
JeraldC. D., By the Numbers, Education Week, 18:5, pp. 102–105, 1998.
