In Erik Olin Wright's recent essay “The Class Analysis of Poverty,” his principal argument was about the centrality of class for understanding and analyzing poverty. While agreeing with this central argument, the author of this article takes issue with Wright's analysis of class relations and in particular the position of the so-called underclass. The author offers instead an analysis that identifies poverty as a peculiar feature of capitalism and its class relationships, pointing to the need for a broader understanding of poverty and of the political forces that need to be mobilized for its eradication.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WrightE. O.The class analysis of poverty. Int. J. Health Serv. 25(1): 85–100, 1995.
2.
GansH.Deconstructing the underclass: The term's danger as a planning concept. J. Am. Planning Assoc. 56(3): 271–277, 1990.
3.
GaillieD.Are the unemployed an underclass? Some evidence from the social change and economic life initiative. Sociology28(3): 737–757, 1994.
4.
SmithD.Understanding the Underclass. Policy Studies Institute, London, 1992.
5.
Special issue. Critique of Anthropology13(3), 1993.
6.
MacnicolJ.In pursuit of the underclass. J. Soc. Policy16(2), 1987.
7.
NovakT.Poverty and the State: An Historical Sociology. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1988.
8.
Charity Organisation Society. Report of the Special Committee on Unskilled Labor. London, 1908.
9.
BeveridgeW. H.Unemployment and its cure: The first step. Contemp. Rev.93: 385–398, 1908.
10.
BeveridgeW. H.Labour Exchanges and the unemployed. Econ. J.17(65): 66–81, 1907.
11.
HobsonJ.The meaning and measure of ‘unemployment’. Contemp. Rev.67: 415–432, 1895.
12.
EdenF. M.The State of the Poor. Or An History of the Labouring Classes in England. 1796.
13.
MarxK.Grundrisse. Pelican, London, 1973.
14.
RoseM.The English Poor Law 1780–1930. David & Charles, London, 1971.
