Is it the Technology or the Teacher? A Comparison of Online and Traditional English Composition Classes

Abstract

Recent reviews of the literature on distance learning have reached two general conclusions. First, students are about as satisfied with the quality of their education in distance-learning (DL) classes as they are in traditional or face-to-face (FTF) classes. Second, students perform about as well in DL classes as they do in FTF classes. We examine this finding of “no significant difference” in a study of students at a public university in the Southeast who were enrolled in online and FTF versions of the same English Composition course. We looked at three student outcomes: satisfaction, learning, and participation in classroom discussion. We found that being in an online class had a positive effect on satisfaction and participation, but no effect on learning even when we controlled for instructor behaviors and classroom characteristics. We attribute the positive effect of being in an online class on student satisfaction—which directly contradicts the no-significant-difference assumption—to the way in which synchronous instruction mimics the traditional classroom. Our findings attest to the importance of both technology and instruction on student satisfaction, learning, and participation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alavi

(1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18, 159–174.

Alavi

Wheeler

B. C.

Valacich

J. S.

(1995). Using IT to re-engineer business education: An exploratory investigation of collaborative telelearning. MIS Quarterly, 19, 293–312.

Allen

Bourhis

Burrell

Mabry

(2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83–97.

Arbaugh

J. B.

(2000a). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with Internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24, 32–54.

Arbaugh

J. B.

(2000b). Virtual classroom versus physical classroom: An exploratory study of class discussion patterns and student learning in an asynchronous Internet-based MBA course. Journal of Management Education, 24, 213–233.

Arbaugh

J. B.

(2000c). How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in Internet-based MBA courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(4), 9–26.

Arbaugh

J. B.

(2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in Web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 42–54.

Collins

Pascarella

E. T.

(2003). Learning on campus and learning at a distance: A randomized instructional experiment. Research in Higher Education, 44(3), 315–326.

Corston

Colman

A. M.

(1996). Gender and social facilitation effects on computer competence and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 171–183.

10.

Fraser

(1993). Classroom environments in post-compulsory education. Youth Studies, 12(4), 41–46.

11.

Gefen

Straub

D. W.

(1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21, 389–400.

12.

Hiltz

S. R.

Wellman

(1997). Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom. Communications of the ACM, 40(9), 44–49.

13.

Inman

Kerwin

Mayes

(1999). Instructor and student attitudes toward distance learning. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 23, 581–591.

14.

Maki

R.H.

Maki

W. S.

(2003). Prediction of learning and satisfaction in Web-based and lecture courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26, 197–219.

15.

Merisotis

J. P.

Phipps

R. A.

(1999). What's the difference? Change, 31(3), 13–20.

16.

Neuhauser

(2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 99–113.

17.

Smith

G. G.

Ferguson

Caris

(2003). The Web versus the classroom: Instructor experiences in discussion-based and mathematics-based disciplines. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29, 29–59.

18.

Stork

Sproull

(1995). Through a glass darkly: What do people learn in video-conferences? Human Communication Research, 22, 197–219.

19.

Strauss

S. G.

(1996). Getting a clue: Communication media and information distribution effects on group process and performance. Small Group Research, 27, 115–142.

20.

Thurmond

V. A.

Wambach

Connors

H. R.

Frey

B. B.

(2002). Evaluation of student satisfaction: Determining the impact of a Web-based environment by controlling for student characteristics. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 169–189.