Although studies of actual communication practices in the workplace are now commonplace, few historical studies in this area have been completed. Such historical studies are necessary to help researchers understand the often complicated origins of genre conventions in professional discourse. Historical research that draws on contemporary genre theory helps address this void. A genre perspective is particularly valuable for helping researchers trace a given type of document's emergence and evolution. This perspective also provides a way of accounting for the connections between communicative practices and the other activities that occupy the attention of workplace organizations. To illustrate what this perspective brings to historical research in professional communication, I examine the development of communicative practices at a national production company that relied on texts to mediate its organizational activities across geographically dispersed locations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CoutureB. and RymerJ., Situational Exigence: Composing Processes on the Job by Writer's Role and Task Value, in Writing in the Workplace: New Research Perspectives, SpilkaR. (ed.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois, pp. 4–20, 1993.
2.
HendersonP. G., Writing Technologies at White Sands, in Electronic Literacies in the Workplace, SullivanP. and DautermannJ. (eds.), National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 65–88, 1996.
3.
HuettmanE., Writing for Multiple Audiences: An Examination of Audience Concerns in a Hospitality Consulting Firm, Journal of Business Communication, 33: 3, pp. 257–273, 1996.
4.
DevittA. J., Lntertextuality in Tax Accounting, in Textual Dynamics of the Professions, BazermanC. and ParadisJ. (eds.), University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 336–357, 1991.
5.
MabritoM., Writing on the Front Line: A Study of Workplace Writing, Business Communication Quarterly, 60: 3, pp. 58–70, 1997.
6.
ArmstrongJ. and JonesS., Business Documents: Their Origins, Sources, and Uses in Historical Research, Mansell Publishing Limited, London, 1987.
7.
YatesJ., Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1989.
8.
BrockmannR. J., From Millwrights to Shipwrights to the Twenty-First Century, Hampton Press, Cresskill, New Jersey, 1998.
9.
BazermanC., Foreword, in Professional Communication: The Social Perspective, BlylerN. R. and ThrallsC. (eds.), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California, pp. vii–x, 1993.
10.
LockerK. O.MillerS. L.RichardsonM.TebeauxE., and YatesJ., Studying the History of Business Communication, Business Communication Quarterly, 59: 2, pp. 109–127, 1996.
11.
FreedmanA. and SmartG., Navigating the Current of Economic Policy: Written Genres and the Distribution of Cognitive Work at a Financial Institution, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, pp. 238–255, 1997.
12.
Van NostrandA. D., Fundable Knowledge: The Marketing of Defense Technology, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1997.
13.
OrlikowskiW. J. and YatesJ., Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, pp. 541–574, 1994.
14.
MillerC. R., Genre as Social Action, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, pp. 157–178, 1984.
15.
CampbellK. K. and JamiesonK. H., Forms and Genre in Rhetorical Criticism: An Introduction, in Form and Genre: Shaping Rhetorical Action, CampbellK. K. and JamiesonK. H. (eds.), The Speech Communication Association, Falls Church, Virginia, 1978.
16.
YatesJ. and OrlikowskiW. J., Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media, Academy of Management Review, 17, pp. 299–326, 1992.
17.
BazermanC., Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, 1988.
18.
BazermanC., Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions, in Genre and the New Rhetoric, FreedmanA. and MedwayP. (eds.), Burgess Science Press, Basingstoke, United Kingdom, pp. 79–101, 1994.
19.
RussellD. R., Rethinking Genre in School and Society: An Activity Theory Analysis, Written Communication, 14, pp. 504–554, 1997.
20.
RussellD. R., Writing and Genre in Higher Education and Workplaces: A Review of Studies that Use Cultural-Historical Activity Theory, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, pp. 224–237, 1997.
21.
FreedmanA. and MedwayP., Locating Genre Studies: Antecedents and Prospects, in Genre and the New Rhetoric, FreedmanA. and MedwayP. (eds.), Burgess Science Press, Basingstoke, United Kingdom, pp. 1–20, 1994.
22.
BerkenkotterC. and HuckinT. N., Rethinking Genre from a Sociocognitive Perspective, Written Communication, 10, pp. 475–509, 1993.
23.
ChandlerA. D.Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Belknap, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1977.
24.
Rath Packing Company, Waterloo Packer: The Story of the Rath Packing Company, Rath Packing Company, Waterloo, Iowa, 1941.
25.
AkersB. L. to LipscombW. O., February 17, 1959, C005/049.
26.
MuthJ. A. to all district and office managers, October 29, 1943, PR017/023.
27.
ParkerC. H. to Branch Managers and Accountants, October 12, 1973, C010/014.
28.
June 15, 1942, PR001/008.
29.
May 7, 1935, PR001/008.
30.
ParéA. and SmartG., Observing Genres in Action: Towards a Research Methodology, in Genre and the New Rhetoric, FreedmanA. and MedwayP. (eds.), Burgess Science Press, Basingstoke, United Kingdom, pp. 146–154, 1994.
31.
ZachryMark, Management Discourse and Popular Narratives: The Myriad Plots of Total Quality Management, in Narrative and Professional Communication, BlylerN. R. and PerkinsJ. M. (eds.), Ablex Publishing, Norwood, New Jersey, pp. 107–120, 1999.
32.
ZachryMark, Constructing Usable Documentation: A Study of Communicative Practices and the Early Uses of Mainframe Computing in Industry, SIGDOC'99: Proceedings on the Seventeenth Annual International Conference of Computer Documentation, pp. 22–25, 1999.
