One of the most sensitive indicators of the general socioeconomic level of a nation is the infant mortality rate. For industrialized societies, however, the problem of adapting to economic growth concerns less the level of economic growth than whether that growth is relatively smooth or chaotic. Thus, if there is in fact a continuing inverse relationship between economic growth rates and trends in infant mortality, such a relationship should be most accurately observed in comparisons between short and intermediate fluctuations in trends in infant mortality and in the economy. The results of this analysis indicate that significant changes in the trends in perinatal, neonatal, and postneonatal and maternal mortality occur regularly in the United States as a result of environmental change associated with economic fluctuations. The evidence indicates that economic recessions and upswings have played a significant role in fetal, infant, and maternal mortality in the last 45 years. In fact, economic instability has probably been responsible for the apparent lack of continuity in the decline in infant mortality rates since 1950.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GoldsmithS. B.The status of health status indicators. Health Services Report87: 212–220, 1972.
2.
MoriyamaI. M.Problems in the measurement of health status. In Indicators of Social Change, edited by SheldonE.MooreW., pp. 576, 577, 593. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1968.
3.
StockwellE. G.Infant mortality and socioeconomic status: A changing relationship. Milbank Mem. Fund Q. 11(1): 101–111, 1962.
4.
WrongD.Population, pp. 36–38. Random House, New York, 1956.
5.
BendorD.ChangC.FisherR. W.BellocN. B.Factors affecting postneonatal mortality. Health Services and Mental Health Administration Health Reports86: 482–486, 1971.
6.
MacMahonB.KovarM. G.FeldmanJ. J.Infant mortality rates: Socioeconomic factors. Vital Health Stat. Series 22, No. 14, DHEW Publication No. (HSM) 72–1045. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland, 1972.
7.
DonabedianA.RosenfeldL. S.SouthernE.Infant mortality and socioeconomic status in a metropolitan community. Public Health Rep. 80(12): 1083–1094, 1965.
8.
McMahanC. A.The lower limit of the infant mortality rate in the United States. Milbank Mem. Fund Q. 37: 337–346, October 1959.
9.
FaigelH. C.Childhood mortality is no way to measure a nation's health. Clin. Pediatr. (Bologna)11: 193–194, 1972.
10.
Key Issues in Infant Mortality. Proceedings of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Conference, Washington, D. C., 1969, scientific editor, FalknerF., National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, 1969.
11.
MoriyamaI. M.Present status of infant mortality problem in the United States. Am. J. Public Health56: 623–625, 1966.
12.
ChaseH. C.International comparison of perinatal and infant mortality: The United States and six West European countries. Vital Health Stat. Series 3, No. 6, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Washington, D. C., 1967.
13.
ChaseH. C.The position of the United States in international comparison of health status. Am. J. Public Health62: 581–589, April 1972.
14.
ChaseH. C.Ranking countries by infant mortality rates. Public Health Rep. 84: 19–27, January 1969.
15.
WegmanM. E.ArborA.International trends in postperinatal mortality. Am. J. Dis. Child.121: 105–109, 1971.
16.
The change in mortality trend in the United States. Vital Health Stat. Series 3, No. 1, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Washington, D. C., 1964.
17.
FrederiksenH.Feedbacks in economic and demographic transition. Science166: 837–846, 1969.
18.
StockwellE. G.Infant mortality and socioeconomic status in Providence. R.I. Med. J.592–596, November 1963.
19.
StockwellE. G.A critical examination of the relationship between socioeconomic status and mortality. Am. J. Public Health53: 956–964, June 1963.
20.
WillieC. V.A research note on the changing association between infant mortality and socioeconomic status. Social Forces37: 221–227, March 1959.
21.
ShapiroS.SchlesingerE. R.NesbittR. E. L.Jr.Infant Perinatal, Maternal and Childhood Mortality in the United States. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1968.
22.
NoldB.StallonesR. A.ReynoldsW. E.The social class gradient of perinatal mortality in dependents of military personnel. Am. J. Epidemiol.83: 481–488, 1965.
23.
HeadyJ. A.HeasmanM. A.Social and Biological Factors in Infant Mortality. General Register Office. Studies in Medical and Population Subjects, No. 15. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1959.
24.
HeadyJ. A.MorrisJ. N.Social and biological factors in infant mortality variations of mortality with mother's age and parity. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Commonw.66: 577–591, August 1959.
25.
DalyC.HeadyJ. A.MorrisJ. N.The effects of mother's age and parity of social-class differences in infant mortality. Lancet445–448, 1955.
26.
IllsleyR.Social class selection and class differences in relation to stillbirths and infant deaths. Br. Med. J.1520–1524, December 1955.
27.
ShapiroS.SchlesingerE. R.NesbittR. E. L.Jr.Infant and perinatal mortality in the United States. Vital Health Stat. Series 3, No. 4, p. 55. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Washington, D. C., 1965.
28.
FalknerF.Key issues in infant mortality. Environmental Child Health17(1): 3–6, 1971.
29.
LundbergE.Stability and Economic Growth. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1968.
30.
MitchellW. C.What Happens during Business Cycles: A Progress Report. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, 1951.
31.
MooreG. H., editor. Business Cycle Indicators. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1961.
32.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1957: Continuation to 1962 and Revisions, Series D-47, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 1965.
33.
LebergottS.The Measurement and Behavior of Unemployment, pp. 213–214. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, 1956.
34.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Reports, Series P-25, No. 114, p. 50. Monthly Labor Review, 1948.
35.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Reports, Series P-50. Nos. 2, 13, 19, 31, 40, 45, 59, 67, 72, and 85, 1940–1957.
36.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment and Earnings, 1958–1968.
37.
National Office of Vital Statistics. Vital Statistics of the United States, 1915–1968.
38.
TintnerG.Econometrics, pp. 216–238. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1952.
39.
LiviatanN.Consistent estimation of distributed lags. International Economic Review January 1963.
40.
KleinL. R.The estimation of distributed lags. Econometrica26(4): 553–565, 1958.
41.
MalinvaudE.The estimation of distributed lags: A comment. Econometrica1961.
42.
DurbinJ.WatsonG. S. Parts I and II, Biometrika1950 and 1951.
43.
DurbinJ.J. Roy. Statist. Soc. (Series B) 22: 139–153, 1960.
44.
BlalockH. M.Social Statistics, p. 31. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960.
45.
LighthillM. J.An Introduction to Fourier Analysis and Generalized Functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1959.
46.
PapoulisA.The Fourier Integral and Its Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962.
47.
FishmanG. S.Spectral Methods in Econometrics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1969.
48.
GrangerC. W. J.Spectral Analysis of Economic Time Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1964.
49.
BrennerM. H.Economic change and mental hospitalization: New York State, 1910–1960. Social Psychiatry2: 180–188, 1967.
50.
BrennerM. H.Patterns of psychiatric hospitalization among different socioeconomic groups in response to economic stress. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis.148: 31–38, 1968.
51.
HatchM. C.Maternal and perinatal mortality-prenatal care. N. Y. State J. Med.1800–1806, 1970.
52.
HartmanE. E.SaylesE. B.Some reflections on birth and infant deaths among the low socioeconomic groups. Minn. Med.1711–1718, 1965.
53.
BairdD.Perinatal mortality. Lancet511–516, 1969.
54.
DonnellyJ. F.AbernathyJ. R.CreadickR. N.FlowersC. E.GreenbergB. G.WellsH. B.Fetal, parental, and environmental factors associated with perinatal mortality in mothers under 20 years of age. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.80: 663–669, 1960.
55.
BergnerL.YerbyA. S.Low income and barriers to use of health services. New Engl. J. Med.278: 541–546, 1968.
56.
JamesG.Poverty and public health, I. Poverty as an obstacle to health progress in our cities. Am. J. Public Health55(11): 1757–1771, 1965.
57.
SehamM.Poverty, illness, and the Negro child. Pediatrics46(2): 305–311, 1970.
58.
DesmondM. M.FranklinR. R.BlattnerR. J.HillR. M.The relation of maternal disease to fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 8: 421–440, 1961.
59.
AykroydW. R.Nutrition and mortality in infancy and early childhood: Past and present relationships. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.24: 480–487, April 1971.
60.
ComstockG. W.ShahF. K.MeyerM. B.AbbeyH.Low birth weight and neonatal mortality rate related to maternal smoking and socioeconomic status. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.11: 53–59, 1971.
61.
AbernathyJ. R.GreenbergB. G.WellsH. B.FrazierT. M.Smoking as an independent variable in a multiple regression analysis upon birth weight and gestation. Am. J. Public Health56(4): 626–633, 1966.
62.
JenkinsC. D.Psychologic and social precursors of coronary disease. New Engl. J. Med.284: 307–317, 1971.
63.
NiswanderK. R.BerendesH.Effect of maternal cardiac disease on the infant. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology11: 1026–1040, 1966–1968.
64.
BuemannB.KragelundE.Morbidity and mortality among infants born to mothers with heart disease. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.41: 80–85, 1962.
65.
MacMahonB.YenS.Unrecognised epidemic of anencephaly and spina bifida. Lancet31–33, 1971.
66.
PenroseL. S.Genetics of anencephaly. J. Ment. Defic. Res.1: 4–15, 1957.
67.
EdwardsJ. H.Congenital malformations of the central nervous system in Scotland. Br. J. Prev. Soc. Med.12: 115–130, 1958.
