Over recent decades, whether legislation supporting mandatory retirement should exist has been debated frequently. The issue has been exacerbated by the growing number of elderly people within western societies. Using nationally representative data from the United States of America, West Germany, Great Britain, and Australia, this article provides an international comparison of individual's attitudes toward mandatory retirement. These attitudes are found to differ sharply according to country, with the Americans most strongly opposed and the Britons most accepting. Multiple regression techniques are used to address the relative importance of socio-demographic and political ideological factors in predicting attitudes toward compulsory retirement. The strongest socio-demographic predictor is education. Measures of political ideology are also significant predictors; that is, acceptance of government intervention in various areas of the labor market is positively related to the acceptance of government regulation of retirement age.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderG. J., ADEA Offers Choices, Aging and Work, 5, p. 211, 1982.
2.
FriedmanL. M., Your Time Will Come: The Law of Age Discrimination and Mandatory Retirement, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1984.
3.
GivensH., An Evaluation of Mandatory Retirement, Annals, AAPSS, 438, pp. 50–58, 1978.
4.
LevineM. L., Age Discrimination and the Mandatory Retirement Controversy, Baltimore, Maryland, 1988.
5.
ParkerS. R., Work and Retirement, Allen and Unwin, London, 1982.
6.
Senate Committee on Retirement Age Policies, Retirement Without Tears: Report of the Special Committee on Retirement Age Policies, Canadian Government Publishing Centre, Hull, Canada, 1979.
7.
SheppardH. L., The Issue of Mandatory Retirement, AAPSS, Annals, 438, pp. 40–49, 1978.
8.
SheppardH. L. and RixS. E., The Graying of Working America, Free Press, New York, 1977.
9.
WalkerJ. W. and LazerJ. L., The End of Mandatory Retirement: Implications for Management, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1978.
10.
Labour Canada, Part-time Work in Canada: Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Part-time Work, Ministry of Labour, Ottawa, 1983.
11.
BurkhauserR. V. and QuinnJ. F., An Economy Wide View of Changing Mandatory Retirement Rules, in The End of Mandatory Retirement: Effects on Higher Education, HolderKaren C. and Lee HansenW. (eds.), Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco, 1989.
12.
LazearE., Why is there Mandatory Retirement?, Journal of Political Economy, 87, pp. 1261–1284, 1979.
13.
LeighD. E., Why is there Mandatory Retirement? An Empirical Reexamination, Journal of Human Resources, 19, pp. 512–531, 1984.
14.
BarronM.L., The Aging American, Thomas Y. Crowell, New York, 1961.
15.
JacobsonD., Rejection of the Retiree Role: A Study of Female Industrial Workers in their 50s, Human Relations, 27, pp. 477–492, 1974.
16.
Nation's Business, A Strong Protest against Forced Retirement, 64, pp. 14–15, July 1976.
17.
WhitbourneS. K.SmithG., and SperbeckD. J., Is There a Generation Gap in Academia: Age Differences among Faculty in Attitudes towards Mandatory Retirement, Educational Gerontology, 7, pp. 67–78, 1981.
18.
InkelesA. and UsuiC., Retirement Patterns in Cross-National Perspective, in Age Structuring in Comparative Perspective, KertzerD. I. and Warner SchaieK. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, 1989.
19.
JohnsonE. S. and WilliamsonJ. B., Retirement in the United States, in Retirement in Industrialized Societies, MarkidesK. S. and CooperC. L. (eds.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1987.
20.
LakeM., ADEA Litigation: Substantive Requirements, Aging and Work, 5, pp. 213–221, 1982.
21.
HoldenK. C. and HansenW. L., The End of Mandatory Retirement: Effects on Higher Education, Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco, 1989.
22.
ButterworthR. and NewtonJ., The Age Pension and the Retirement Age, Social Security Journal, pp. 46–59, 1985.
23.
DreyfussM., Law and Old People in Australia, occasional paper in gerontology, No. 5, National Research Institute of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Melbourne, 1983.
24.
HannanL., Inventing Retirement, Cambridge University Press, London, 1986.
25.
HoweA. L. and ManningI., Retirement in Australia, in Retirement in Industrialized Societies, MarkidesK. S. and CooperC. L. (eds.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1987.
26.
ParkerS. R., Retirement in Britain, in Retirement in Industrialized Societies, MarkidesK. S. and CooperC. L. (eds.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1987.
27.
RosenmanL. S. and WinocurS., Australian Women and Income Security for Old Age: A Cohort Study, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 5, pp. 277–291, 1990.
28.
McCallumJ., Australian Mandatory Retirement Challenged, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health Working Paper Number 21, November 1990.
29.
KelleyJ. and EvansM. D. R., International Opinion: Compulsory Retirement, National Social Science Survey Report, 1:1, p. 9, Australian National University, Canberra, 1988.
30.
McConnellS. R., Retirement and Employment, in Aging: Scientific Perspectives and Social Issues (2nd Edition), WodruffD. S. and BirrenJ. E. (eds.), Brooks/Cole, Monterey, California, pp. 333–350, 1983.
31.
HendriksJ., Impact of Technological Change on Middle-Aged and Older Workers: Parallels drawn from a Structural Perspective, in Aging and Technological Advances, RobinsonP. K.LivingstonJ. and BirenJ. (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, 1984.
32.
DoeringM.RhodesS. R., and SchusterM., The Aging Worker: Research and Recommendations, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, 1983.
33.
KotlikoffL. J., Estimating the Age-Productivity Profile Using Lifetime Earnings, working paper series, No. 2788, National Bureau of Economic Research Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1988.
34.
KohliM. and Von KondratowitzH.-J., Retirement in Germany: Towards the Construction of the Citizen of the Work Society, in Retirement in Industrialized Societies, MarkidesK. S. and CooperC. L. (eds.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 131–166, 1987.
35.
HallerM.HollingerF., and RaubalO., Leviathan or Welfare State? Attitudes toward the Role of Government in Six Advanced Western Nations, in Attitudes to Inequality and the Role of Government, BeckerJ. W.DaviesJ. A.EsterP., and MohlerP. (eds.), pp. 33–62, Social en Cultureel Planbureau, Rijswijk, 1990.
36.
DavisJ. A. and JowellR., Measuring National Differences: An Introduction to the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), in British Social Attitudes: Special International Report, JowellR.WitherspoonS., and BrookL. (eds.), Gower, Aldershot, 1989.
37.
National Social Science (NSSS) Report, The National Social Science Survey, National Social Science Survey Report, 2:2, p. 11, Australian National University, Canberra, 1990.
38.
L. Harris and Associates Inc., The Myth and Reality of Aging in America, The National Council on the Aging, Washington, DC, 1975.
39.
L. Harris and Associates Inc., Retirement and Income, Garland, New York, 1984.
40.
BeanC., Are Australian Attitudes to Government Different? A Comparison with Five Other Nations, in Australia Compared, CastlesF. G. (ed.), Allen and Unwin, Sydney, 1991.
41.
InglehartR., Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1990.
42.
SaxS., Development of Public Policy for the Aged, in Grey Policy Australian Policies for an Aging Society, KendigH. L. and McCallumJ. (eds.), Allen and Unwin, Sydney, 1990.
43.
HaywardM. D. and HardyM. A., Early Retirement Processes among Older Men, Research on Aging, 7, pp. 491–515, 1985.
44.
HardyM. A., Social Policy and Determinants of Retirement: A Longitudinal Analysis of Older White Males, 1969–75, Social Forces, 60, pp. 1103–1122, 1982.
